"Administrative Procedure Act" tagged Cases and Lawsuits
| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND et al v. SCHAFER et al | September 8, 2008 | September 14, 2009 |
| Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the implementation and enforcement of the National Animal Identification System because the NAIS program requires the use of electronic radio frequency identification devices (RFIDs), which violates their religious freedoms and beliefs. Plaintiffs allege that the use of a numbering system for their premises and/or an electronic numbering system for their animals constitutes some form of a "mark of the beast" and/or represents an infringement of their "dominion over cattle and all living things" in violation of their fundamental religious beliefs. |
| American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al | August 7, 2007 | July 1, 2008 |
| Plaintiff Aviation Parties seek to depose a limited number of former and current FBI employees who participated in FBI investigations of al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda operatives and have first-hand knowledge of facts that are directly relevant to Plaintiffs' defense in the personal injury, wrongful death, and property damage litigations arising out of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. |
| American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al | August 7, 2007 | January 16, 2008 |
| Plainiffs Aviation Parties seeks to set aside the final agency action of the Central Intelligence Agency refusing to permit Plaintiffs to depose two witnesses--the former Deputy Chief of the CIA's Usama Bin Laden Unit and the FBI Special Agent detailed to the Usama Bin Laden Unit--who have first-hand knowledge of facts that are directly relevant to the Plaintiffs' defense in the personal injury, wrongful death, and property damage litigations arising out of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. |
| NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al | June 14, 2006 | November 8, 2007 |
| Plaintiff National Security Archive complains that Defendants Central Intelligence Agency, General Michael V. Hayden and Scott A. Koch has systematically and unlawfully denied Plaintiff's rights, as a representative of the news media, not to be charged processing fees (other than copying fees) in connection with Plaintiff's FOIA requests to the CIA for agency records. |
| PETER B. v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al | September 19, 2006 | August 15, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Peter B. sued Defendants Central Intelligence Agency, General Michael V. Hayden and Margaret Peggy Lyons. Plaintiff alleges that the CIA misclassified Plaintiff as an independent contractor instead of as a full staff employee, and failed to provide him with any due process or administrative rights before his termination. Plaintiff also contends that Defendants have impeded the transfer of his security clearances and implied derogatory information existed that would preclude the granting of a clearance. |
