| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| American Airlines, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. et al | October 17, 2008 | November 20, 2009 |
| Plaintiff American Airlines Inc. alleged that Defendants Yahoo! Inc. and Overture Services, Inc. d/b/a Yahoo! Search Marketing sold to third parties the right to use the trademarks and service marks of American Airlines as keywords that trigger the appearance of paid advertisements. |
| AT&T Mobility LLC v. Cellco Partnership | November 3, 2009 | November 11, 2009 |
| Public Citizen, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board et al | September 23, 2008 | October 15, 2009 |
| Plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of amendments to the lawyer advertising provisions of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct and alleged that the bar to a wide range of common advertising practices, such as the use of testimonials, actors, reenactments and dramatizations, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. |
| Soilworks LLC v Midwest Industrial Supply Inc | September 7, 2006 | April 16, 2009 |
| Plaintiff Soilworks, LLC alleged that Defendant Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. violated the Lanham Act, the Arizona Deceptive Trade Practices Act and Arizona common law by disparaging Plaintiff and its products and falsely representing that Plaintiff is infringing patent rights of Defendant.
|
| Virgin America, Inc. v. Adrants Publishing, LLC et al | January 26, 2009 | January 30, 2009 |
| Grisoft v. Microsoft Corporation et al | December 14, 2007 | December 14, 2007 |
| Grisoft, s.r.o. seeks the identity of the person or company that purchased sponsored advertising from Microsoft Corporation for the avg-soft.com website. |
| Zango Inc v. Internet Brands Inc | April 6, 2007 | July 6, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Zango Inc. alleges that defendant Internet Brands Inc., which operates CarsDirect.com, breached its contract by failing to provide $419,827.26 for Internet advertising it ordered and received from Zango. Defendant counterclaimed that it was only interested in the marketing and sales of automobiles within the United States and that more than half of the traffic being provided by plaintiff to defendant's web sites were from outside the United States. |
| Zango Inc v. Mainstream Advertising | April 6, 2007 | July 2, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Zango Inc. alleges that defendant Mainstream Advertising breached its contract by failing to pay $588,184.37 for Internet advertising it ordered and received from the plaintiff. Defendant counterclaims that plaintiff generated leads by sending web traffic to a pay-per-click (PPC) tracking link without a human user making a click on any PPC ad. |
| Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc. | December 19, 2006 | April 24, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Helio LLC alleged that Defendant Palm, Inc. use the slogan "Not Just a Cell Phone" that is confusingly similar to Plaintiff's "Don't Call It a Phone" trademark, slogan and brand. |
| Zango Inc v. Grant Media LLC | August 1, 2006 | October 16, 2006 |
| Plaintiff Zango Inc. alleges that it entered into a settlement agreement with defendant Grant Media LLC to resolve differences over an advertising contract between the two parties. However, plaintiff alleges that defendant has failed to make payments pursuant to the settlement agreement. |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Nextclick Media LLC et al | March 31, 2008 | |
| Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission alleges that Defendants NextClick Media, LLC, Next Internet LLC, Kenneth Chan and Albert Chen operate several websites advertising for sale over the Internet free trials of various products. Although Defendants claim that the trial of the product is free or that there is no cost to try the product other than a small shipping and handling charge, consumers who elect to keep the product (including the trial product) are charged the same price that is charged for a month's supply. Although Defendants claim that consumers will receive a full refund upon returning unused product from the initial shipment, consumer who elect to return unused product must pay the postage for returning the product and are assessed a restocking fee as well. |
| Boston Duck Tours v. Super Duck Tours, LLC | July 3, 2007 | |
