| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| Franklin v. Apple, Inc. et al | October 28, 2009 | November 12, 2009 |
| Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al | November 4, 2008 | August 24, 2009 |
| Plaintiff Avi Koschitzki alleged that the iPhone 3G did not function properly, as advertised and marketed, on the 3G network in that it allegedly bumped him off the 3G network to the slower EDGE network. |
| Trujillo v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al | August 31, 2007 | March 9, 2009 |
| Plaintiff alleged that defendants Apple Computer, Inc. and AT&T, Inc. purposefully and fraudulently concealed that cost of replacing the iPhone battery, as well as the life span of the iPhone battery. |
| Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al | October 5, 2007 | July 2, 2008 |
| Plaintiffs allege that defendant Apple, Inc. tied the iPhone product to other products an services offered by Apple and AT&T Mobility, LLC |
| Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al | June 6, 2007 | June 2, 2008 |
| Plaintiff alleges that defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,681,120 entitled "Mobile Entertainment and Communication Device." |
| Li v. Apple Inc. et al | September 24, 2007 | May 23, 2008 |
| Plaintiff alleges that (1) Apple discriminated in price between early purchasers and later purchasers of the 8 GB iPhone in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 13, (2) Apple discriminated in rebates between people who purchased iPhones before August 22, 2007 and people who purchased iPhones from August 22 - September 4, 2007 in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 13a, and (3) Apple is selling its iPhone for an unreasonably low price to hurt competition between early and late purchasers of its iPhone in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 13a, (4) Apple and AT&T forced early purchasers to enter into a 2-year service agreement with unfair terms, which later purchasers could avoid by unlocking their iPhones in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 14, (5) AT&T's early termination fee is unfair and deceptive. |
| Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al | August 29, 2007 | April 29, 2008 |
| Plaintiffs allege that defendans Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC failed to inform initial purchasers of the iPhone that fees of over $100 would be required to replace the iPhone battery and maintain service while the battery was being replaced. |
| Hutchison et al v. AT&T Internet Services, Inc. et al | November 15, 2007 | November 15, 2007 |
| Plaintiff sued Defendants AT&T Internet Services, Inc. f/k/a SBC Internet Services, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. for charging customers an early termination fee when customers cancel defendants' services prior to the end of their service agreement with defendants. |
| Smith et al v. Apple, Inc. et al | November 7, 2007 | November 7, 2007 |
| Plaintiff sued defendants Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC for unlawfully tying the iPhone to Apple and AT&T Mobility products and services. Plaintiffs also seek to bar Apple from selling the iPhone with any software lock, from denying warranty service to users of unlocked iPhones, and from requiring iPhone consumers to purchase cell phone service through AT&T Mobility. |
| Web Telephony, LLC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al | March 14, 2007 | October 15, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Web Telephony, LLC alleges that defendants have infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,445,694 and 6,785,266, both entitled "Internet controlled telephone system." |
| NTP, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC | September 7, 2007 | October 9, 2007 |
| Plaintiff NTP, Inc. alleged that AT&T Mobility, LLC infringed on U.S Patent Nos. 5,438,611 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors Originating from Outside of the Electronic Mail System and Method of Operation thereof," 5,479,472 entitled "System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems by RF Communications and Method of Operation thereof," 5,436,960 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors and Method of Operation thereof," 5,625,670 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 5,819,172 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Radios," 6,317,582 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," and 6,317,592 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processor," and 5,631,946 entitled "System for Transferring Information from a RF Receiver to a Processor Under Control of a Program Store by the Processor and Method of Operation thereof". |
| Leung v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al | August 13, 2007 | September 6, 2007 |
| Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Apple Computer, Inc. and AT&T, Inc. failed to inform a nationwide group of initial purchasers of the iPhone that annual fees of over $100 would be required to replace the iPhone battery and maintain service while the battery was being replaced. |
| Gonzalez et al v. Apple Inc. et al | January 30, 2009 | |
| Gillis v. Apple Computer Inc et al | October 8, 2008 | |
| Sen v. Apple Inc. et al | September 22, 2008 | |
| Plaintiff Jai Sen alleged that Defendants Apple Inc. and AT&T Inc. designed, marketed, manufactured, distributed and sold 3G iPhones that prematurely developed hairline cracks in the casing. Plaintiff also alleged that the 3G iPhone demanded too much power and that the AT&T infrastructure was insufficient to handle 3G signal volume. |
| Walters v. Apple Computer Inc et al | September 12, 2008 | |
| Plaintiff Aaron Walters alleged that Defendants Apple Computer, Inc. and AT&T, Inc. engaged in a deceptive and unfair business practice by wrongfully and unfairly deceiving the public and their customers by misrepresenting the speed, strength and performance of their new iPhone 3G device and its related 3G-bandwidth network protocol in the advertisement and sale of their iPhone 3G device. |
| Aloft Media LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al | June 25, 2008 | |
| Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC alleges that Defendants Yahoo!, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and AOL LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,117,443 entitled "Network Browser Graphical User Interface for Managing Web Content," U.S. Patent No. 7,194,691 entitled "Network Browser Window with Adjacent Identifier Selector Interface for Storing Web Content." The allegedly infringing products include the AT&T Yahoo! Browser and the AOL Explorer Version 1.5. |
| AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. Wireless Exclusive USA LLC et al | February 5, 2008 | |
| Klausner Technologies, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al | December 3, 2007 | |
