| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al | May 4, 2007 | November 6, 2009 |
| Plaintiff filed a class action law suit against YouTube and Google for allowing users to upload and distribute media that infringed on plaintiff's copyrights. |
| Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al | September 30, 2008 | October 27, 2009 |
| jukebox to store dvds as DMCA violation |
| Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al | March 13, 2007 | September 14, 2009 |
| Plaintiffs Viacom International Inc., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, and Black Entertainment Television LLC alleged that Defendants YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC and Google Inc. infringed Plaintiffs' copyrights. |
| Coupons, Inc. v. Stottlemire | July 2, 2007 | May 5, 2009 |
| Plaintiff Coupons, Inc. alleged that Defendant John Stottlemire intentionally circumvented technological measures used to limit the number of times a visitor to the coupons.com website may print a coupon. |
| craigslist, Inc. v. Bertz | November 5, 2008 | November 24, 2008 |
| Plaintiff craigslist, Inc. alleged that Defendant George Berz d/b/a adbomber.com sold software and services that enabled users to repetitiously post duplicative ads on craigslist, in multiple categories on craigslist, and in multiple geographic areas on craigslist, and that purposefully circumvent craigslist security measures to do so. Plaintiff also alleged that Defendant had created copies of craiglist's copyrighted website and accessed craigslist's computer system without and in excess of authorization. |
| Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al | September 30, 2008 | October 3, 2008 |
| Plaintiff RealNetworks, Inc. and RealNetworks Home Entertainment, Inc. filed an action for a declaratory judgment that the CSS License Agreement permits Plaintiffs to manufacture and offer for sale the RealDVD product and that the Plaintiffs do not violate the DMCA. |
| IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc. | June 23, 2006 | September 10, 2008 |
| Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. alleged that Defendant Veoh Networks, Inc. infringed the copyrights in Plaintiff's works by reproducing, distributing and displaying the works on Defendant's website without Plaintiff's approval or authorization.
|
| Grisoft,s.r.o. v. Google, Inc. | December 13, 2007 | August 22, 2008 |
| Movant John Doe seeks an order quashing the subpoena directed to Google, Inc. at the request of Grisoft, S.R.O., which seeks the identity of Movant. Movant alleges that Grisoft is attempting to misuse the subpoena process pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. |
| Hasbro, Inc. v. RJ Softwares et al | July 24, 2008 | July 28, 2008 |
| Plaintiff Hasbro, Inc. alleged that Defendants RJ Softwares, Rajat Agarwalla and Jayant Agarwalla infringed on Plaintiff's trademark and copyright by creating and publicly displaying an online game that copies the essential and original elements of the Scrabble board game and promoting and profiting from it in commerce in the United States under the confusingly similar Scrabulous name. |
| Aguiar v. Webb et al | September 7, 2007 | July 17, 2008 |
| Copyright and trademark infringement claims against documentary maker's promotional website and film trailer. |
| Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al | April 17, 2007 | June 3, 2008 |
| Plaintiff Ticketmaster LLC alleges that Defendant RMG Technologies Inc. has developed and marketed automated devices (i.e. Ticket Broker Acquisition Tool) to access and navigate through Ticketmaster's website, thereby infringing Ticketmaster's copyrights and violating the website's Terms of Use and a number of federal and state statutes. Plaintiff contends that Defendant's applications circumvent Plaintiff's access control and copy protection systems, including CAPTCHA, inundate Plaintiff's computers with thousands of automated requests thereby preventing ordinary customers from accessing the website, and enable Defendant's clients to purchase large quantities of tickets. |
| Corbis Corporation vs. Arnold Moving Company, LLC | August 1, 2007 | April 30, 2008 |
| Plaintiff licenses digital images to publishers, advertisers, design agencies, filmmakers and other creative professionals. Plaintiff alleges that WebTamers Web Promotion redesigned the website of Defendant Sterling International. In the course of the redesign, Defendant or its agents downloaded Corbis images and uploaded them to Defendant's website without authorization and without paying for them. |
| Doe v. Geller et al | May 8, 2007 | February 4, 2008 |
| Plaintiff uploaded to YouTube a portion of "Secrets of the Psychics," a NOVA video showing the magician James Randi challenging the performance techniques of Uri Geller. Subsequently, the defendants demanded that YouTube take down the video pursuant to the DMCA. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages for misrepresentation of copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. |
| Grisoft v. Microsoft Corporation et al | December 14, 2007 | December 14, 2007 |
| Grisoft, s.r.o. seeks the identity of the person or company that purchased sponsored advertising from Microsoft Corporation for the avg-soft.com website. |
| Veoh Networks, Inc. v. UMG Recordings, Inc. et al | August 9, 2007 | November 15, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Veoh Networks, Inc. is a video hosting service that provides a mechanism for third parties to share video on the Internet. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that (1) it has no liability to defendants for the unsolicited posting of content on the Veoh website; (2) it is not liable for direct, contributory or vicarious infringement of defendants' copyrights; (3) it is not liable for inducing the infringement of any of defendants' copyrights; (4) defendants are not entitled to any injunctions against plaintiff; and (5) it is entitled to safe harbor pursuant to 17 USC § 512(c). |
| Cal IV Entertainment, LLC v. Youtube, Inc. et al | June 7, 2007 | July 10, 2007 |
| Plaintiff, a music publishing company, alleges that Defendants infringed its copyrights by allowing users to upload videos containing plaintiff's copyrighted works and providing access to certain content filtering technologies only to existing business partners. |
| Grisman et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al | May 10, 2007 | May 25, 2007 |
| Plaintiffs, owners of Dawg Music, allege that Defendants infringed on plaintiff's protected works and refused to deter infringing activities. |
| Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. v. Earthlink Legal Department | April 12, 2007 | April 17, 2007 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski LLP issued a subpoena seeking the identity of the individual or individuals who posted copyrighted questions from the July 2006 Multistate Bar Examination on www.tabandbrandy.blogspot.com. |
| CoStar Group, Inc. v. Commercial Investment MLS | December 22, 2005 | January 6, 2006 |
| Koprowski v. Google Inc | October 14, 2003 | January 5, 2004 |
| Plaintiff Gene Koprowski sought a subpoena to determine the identity of the person who authored a blog post. Plaintiff alleged that the blog published an article that was copyrighted by him and infringed on his trademark. |
| Kruska v. Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated.Org et al | January 10, 2008 | |
| Plaintiff Jan E. Kruska sued Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated (www.corporatesexoffenders.com and wikisposure project), Xavier Von Erck a/k/a Phillip John Eide, Christopher Brocious (absolutezerounited.blogspot.com, absolutezerounited.com and absolutezerounited.org), Barbara W. Ochoa a/k/a Petra Luna, Filmax Inc. (www.jankruska.com and www.jankruska.net), April Butler, David M. Butler, Godaddy.com, Bob Parsons, and MySpace.com. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from posting on their website claims that Plaintiff is a predator, pedophile, child molester and pro-pedophile. Plaintiff also charges defendants with intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, cyberstalking and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. |
| In Re Subpoena to Sago Networks Online Service Provider Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 512(h) (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) | December 12, 2006 | |
| Paramount Pictures Corporation v. YouTube, Inc. | May 4, 2006 | |
