Perfect 10 Inc v. George Dranichak et al

Plaintiff:Perfect 10 Inc
Defendant:George Dranichak and Does
 
Case Number:2:2004cv02581
Filed:April 13, 2004
 
Court:California Central District Court
Office:Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ]
County:Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: A Howard Matz
Referring Judge: Jennifer T. Lum
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Copyrights
Cause:17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Both

Date Filed

#

Docket Text

April 13, 2004 1 COMPLAINT against defendant George Dranichak.(Filing fee $ 150.) Jury Demanded. , filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.(rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 13, 2004   20 Day Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery)[1] as to George Dranichak. (rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 13, 2004 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 13, 2004   REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING COPYRIGHT (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Opening) (rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 13, 2004   FAX number for Attorney Valerie E Kincaid, Jeffrey N Mausner is 310-473-8303. (rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 13, 2004   FAX number for Attorney Daniel J Cooper, Randall Brian Lewis is 310-205-9638. (rrey, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 14, 2004 3 INITIAL ORDER following filing of complaint assigned to Judge A Howard Matz by Judge A. Howard Matz (lc, ) (Entered: April 16, 2004)
April 26, 2004   PREPARED ORDER RE TRANSFER Pursuant to General Order 224 (Related Case) by Clerk; related to CV 97-6967 LGB (SHx). (rn, ) (Entered: April 26, 2004)
May 19, 2004 4 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Lourdes G. Baird, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 97-6967 LGB (SHx)(rn, ) (Entered: May 19, 2004)
July 9, 2004 5 MINUTES: Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for lack of prosecution; Court on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than 7/26/04 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendans for lack of prosecution.As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff(s) Court will accept one of the following if it is filed on or before date as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been served), In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all default, Request for entry of default by Plaintiff (s) (applicable where defendants have been served but not answered), motion for default judgment or request for clerk to enter default judgment; No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court; Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by Plaintiff(s) is due by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir) (Entered: July 12, 2004)
July 15, 2004 6 MINUTES: Order Discharging Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause. Plaintiff is again advised that if necessary, it must pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir) (Entered: July 15, 2004)
July 15, 2004 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed upon George Dranichak served on 6/10/2004, answer due 6/30/2004. The Summons and Complaint were served by Personal service, by Federal statute. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (ir ) (Entered: July 16, 2004)
September 17, 2004 8 MINUTES: Further Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court on its own motion, now orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 9/29/04 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff, Court will accept a motion for default judgment or request for clerk to enter default judgment if it is filed on or before the above date. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff is due by Judge A Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir ) (Entered: September 20, 2004)
September 28, 2004 9 MINUTES: Order Discharging Further Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir ) (Entered: September 29, 2004)
September 28, 2004 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Defendant George Dranichak shall file and serve his answer to the complaint in this action on or before Tuesday 10/19/2004. (ir) (Entered: 09/29/2004)
September 29, 2004 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc to Order to Show Cause regarding Dismisal for Lack of Prosecution 8 (ir ) (Entered: September 30, 2004)
October 19, 2004 12 CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Defendant George Dranichak. (nhac, ) (Entered: October 21, 2004)
October 19, 2004 13 ANSWER to Complaint [1] with Jury Demand filed by defendant George Dranichak.(nhac, ) (Entered: October 21, 2004)
October 28, 2004 14 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) Scheduling Conference by Judge A. Howard Matz. This matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 12/20/04 at 1:30 PM. The conference will be held pursuant to FRCP 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations under FRCP 26(a)(1) to disclose information... See documents for further details.(nhac, ) (Entered: October 28, 2004)
December 13, 2004 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz that all claims in this action between plaintiff and defendant George Dranichak shall be dismissed, with prejudice, with each of the settling parties to bear its or his own costs and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(nhac, ) (Entered: December 14, 2004)
December 14, 2004   REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING Copyright (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Closing) (nhac, ) (Entered: December 14, 2004)
Docket Report Last Checked: November 29, 2007 15:25:39 PST
Search for this case: Perfect 10 Inc v. George Dranichak et al
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perfect 10 Inc
Represented By: Jeffrey N Mausner, Randall Brian Lewis, Valerie E Kincaid, Daniel J Cooper
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Dranichak
Represented By: John A Case, Jr
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]