Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Plaintiff Perfect 10 sued defendant Google Inc. for displaying thumbnails of photographs copyrighted by the plaintiff. Consolidated with Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al. See also Perfect 10 v Microsoft..

Additional Resources

Plaintiff:Perfect 10 Inc
Defendant:Google Inc and Does
Counter Claimant:Google Inc
Counter Defendant:Perfect 10 Inc
 
Case Number:2:2004cv09484
Filed:November 19, 2004
 
Court:California Central District Court
Office:Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ]
County:Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: A Howard Matz
Referring Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Copyrights
Cause:17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed#Document Text
November 19, 20043NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(rrey, )
November 23, 20044MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Counsel are notified that the action has beenrecently assigned to this Court. The correct number forthis case is now CV04-9484-NM(CWx). All subsequentdocuments filed with the court must reflect this casenumber. All documents must be in Times Roman 14 font,pursuant to Local Rule 11-3.1.1. Counsel are encouraged toreview the Central District's website for additionalinformation. The address is "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov".by Judge Nora M. ManellaCourt Reporter: None Appearing. (pj, )
November 23, 20045Court Opinion or Order STANDING ORDER: This controls this case and differs in somerespects from the local rules by Judge Nora M. Manella,(pj, )
February 17, 200511MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Counsel are notified that a Scheduling Conference set for 3/28/2005 09:00 AM. Counsel joint Status Report filed no later than 3/7/2005 by Judge Nora M. Manella.Court Reporter: None Appearing. (pj, )
March 28, 200515MINUTES Scheduling Conference by Judge Nora M. Manella: Court sets the following schedule: Deadline for filing Settlement Selection: 4/4/05; Discovery Cutoff, Fact: 2/24/06, Expert: 5/26/06; Motions due by 6/26/2006. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2006 08:30 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2006 10:00 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. (See document for further information)Court Reporter: Not Applicable. (dw, )
March 29, 200516Court Opinion or Order ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Nora M. Manella: ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties to be filed no later than 4/4/05. (dw, )
March 29, 200517Court Opinion or Order ORDER RE CIVIL TRIAL by Judge Nora M. Manella: Court has ordered the dates as indicated above and described as follows: Discovery cut-off 5/26/2006. Motions due by 6/26/2006. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2006 08:30 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2006 10:00 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. (See document for further information(dw, )
April 5, 200518Court Opinion or Order SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE SELECTION NOTICE REQUEST AND ORDER by Judge Nora M. Manella: IT IS SO ORDERED, the above request is approved: Settlement Procedure No. 3 - The parties shall appear before a retired judicial officer or other private or non-profit dispute resolution body(dw, )
August 24, 200520Court Opinion or Order ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 02-7624 AHM (SHx). Case transfered from Judge Nora M. Manella and Carla Woehrle to Judge A. Howard Matz and Stephen J. Hillman for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx).Signed by Judge A. Howard Matz (rn, )
August 26, 200521Court Opinion or Order INITIAL ORDER Following Filing of Complaint Assigned to Judge Matz by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge A. Howard Matz. Counsel for Plaintiff shall serve this order on all defendants and/or their counsel along with the summons and complaint or if that is not practicable as soon as possible thereafter. (See document for further information)(dw, )
August 30, 200531Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : The Court hereby orders Defendant Google, Inc. (Google) to obtain a copy of Amazon.com's Motion To Stay Action Until Conclusion Of First Filed Related Action Or Alternatively For Consolidation, filed by Amazon.com on 8/25/05, in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., CV 05-4753. The Court further orders Google to file, by not later than 9/7/05, a statement not to exceed five pages regarding Google's position on consolidation with that case. Google shall serve copies on both Amazon.com and Perfect 10.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, )
September 2, 200532Court Opinion or Order STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge A. Howard Matz : Defendant shall file and personally serve its brief in opposition to the motion on 9/26/05. Plaintiff shall file and serve by overnight courier its reply brief in support of the motion on 10/17/05. Hearing on MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 is continued to 10/31/2005 at 10:00 a.m.(smo, )
September 19, 200534MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the above Motion (Motion to Stay Action or Alternatively for Consolidation filed 8/25/05) filed in CV05-4753 AHM. Court specifically denies the request to stay action and grants the request to consolidate CV05-4753 AHM (SHx) with CV04-9484 AHM. Court continues plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in CV04-09484 AHM (SHx) to 11/7/05 at 10:00am to be heard with plaintiff's 11/7/05 motion for preliminary injunction in CV05-4753 AHM (SHx). Court also sets a further consolidated scheduling conference for 11/21/05 at 1:30pm. RE: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 , Resetting Hearing as to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (dw, )
September 20, 200535Court Opinion or Order ORDER Setting Further Consolidated Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case has been assigned to Judge A. Howard Matz. Scheduling Conference set for 11/21/2005 01:30 PM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (See document for further information)(dw, )
September 28, 200538Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING Notice of Moiton to Strike Declaration of Norman Zada submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 9/28/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, )
September 28, 200541Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING Defendants' Motion to Strike Declaration, Declaration of Norman Zada submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 9/26/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, )
October 13, 200548Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Ordering Motion of Amicus Curiae For Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brie; Declaration of Jason Chulty In Support of Service; Brif Amicus Curiae filed by (Filer not specified) to be rejected and not filed and is ORDERED returned to Counsel. Reason for rejection: Local Rule 6.1 Written notice of motion lacking or timeliness of notice incorrect; Other: Court requires 14 Point Font Size(dw, )
October 14, 200549Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Ordering the Notice of Moiton of Electronic Frontier Foundation For Leave to File Amicus Curiae; Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae; Declaration of Jason M Schultz in Support; Proposed Order Brief Amicus Curiae; Proof of received 10/13/05 is to be filed and processed. Filing date is ORDERED to be the date the doucment was stamped received but not filed with the Clerk. processed. (dw, )
October 17, 200555MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Telephonic argument held. Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. However plaintiff's counsel is expected to be as prepared as possible for discovery meet and confer sessions, so that Dr. Zada's participation is kept to a minimum.Tape #: 05-38. (sbu, )
November 7, 200574MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz : Court issues draft outline and questions counsel. For reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS Electronic Frontier Foundation's Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Norman Zada. Court also GRANTS the request for judicial notice and DENIES the Ex Parte Application to File a Sur-Reply. The proposed Sur-Reply will be stamped "PLACED IN FILE NOT USED." Court takes UNDER SUBMISSION both of Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction.Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (smo, )
November 8, 200583Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING 1) Proposed Sur-Reply Declaration of Alexander MacGillivray ; 2) Proof of Service by E Mail 3) Proof of Service by Hand delivery submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 11/7/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, )
November 17, 200586Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference 35 from 11/21/05 to 12/12/05 at 1:30 p.m. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/5/2005. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, )
November 29, 200592MINUTES OF (In Chambers) by Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Court's own motion the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference to 1/10/2006 01:30 PM.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (dw, )
December 27, 200593MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Following oral argument on 12-21-05, the court now rules on Google's Motion for entry of Protective Order. Defendant Amzon hhas joinded in defendant Google's Motion papers, and oral argument, though Amazon has not filed otion papers on its own. Accordingly, the court enters plaintiff's Proposed Protective Order.Tape #: 05-51. (sbu, )
December 27, 200594Court Opinion or Order PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman: IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Document for further information)(dw, )
January 5, 200695Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby vacates the 1/10/06 Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference. The Court will reset the scheduling conference after it rules on the pending preliminary injunction motions.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, )
January 27, 2006104Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman :, Resetting Hearing as to MOTION to Compel 96 , MOTION for Order for Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 Motion set for hearing on 2/21/2006 and 2/22/2006 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, )
February 17, 2006119Court Opinion or Order ORDER Granting in Part and Denying In Part Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Google by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Perfect 10's motion for a preliminary injunction aginst Google. re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 (dw, )
February 21, 2006120Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court DENIES Perfect 10's motion for preliminary injunction against Amazon. RE: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Court Reporter: N/A. (dw, )
February 24, 2006121Court Opinion or Order ORDER SETTING FURTHER RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge A. Howard Matz: The conference will be held pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) to disclose information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under R. 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and to file a report with the Court entitled "Further Joint Rule 26(f) Report" not later than fourteen (14) days after they confer. Further Joint Rule 26 Report due by 3/27/06. Further Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/06 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge A. Howard Matz.(smo, )
March 20, 2006123PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Appeal of Order, 119 Filed On: 2/17/06; Entered On: 2/21/06; Filing fee $255, Paid receipt number 83391. cc: Jeffrey N. Mausner; Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp; Daniel J. Cooper; Winston and Strawn, San Fransisco, California; Winston and Strawn, Los Angeles, Califronia; Townsend and Townsend and Crew. (ghap, ) Modified on 3/21/2006 (ghap, ).
March 22, 2006129Court Opinion or Order ORDER Granting Application to File Exhibits to the Declaration of Heraldo Botelho In Support of Memorandum in Support of Google's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order Under Seal by Judge A. Howard Matz: GRANTED. re APPLICATION to Seal 124 (dw, )
March 22, 2006131PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL/Representation Statement to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Order 119 Filed On: 02/17/06; Entered On: 02/21/06. Filing fee $255, Paid, receipt number 83451. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman; Jeffrey N. Mausner; Daniel J. Cooper; Anthony J. Malutta. (cbr, ) Modified on 3/24/2006 (cbr, ).
March 22, 2006132TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 11/7/05; Court Reporter: Leslie A. King; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 . (ghap, )
March 27, 2006133Court Opinion or Order ORDER Granting Application to File Declarations of Radhika Malpani and Jessie Jiang and Portions of Goodle Inc's Response to Plaintiff's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction Under Seal by Judge A Howard Matz: GRANTED. (dw, ) Modified on 3/28/2006 (dw, ).
March 27, 2006145TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 11/7/05; Preliminary Hearing; Court Reporter: Leslie King; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 . (ghap, )
March 30, 2006146Court Opinion or Order MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference 121 from 4/3/06 to 4/17/06 at 1:30 p.m. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, )
March 30, 2006147NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 06-55406, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc. (ghap, )
April 6, 2006148CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, ; Court of Appeals Case Number: 06-55406. (ghap, )
April 7, 2006149NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 06-55425, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 filed by Google Inc. (cbr, )
April 11, 2006152Court Opinion or Order JOINT STIPULATION For Stay of Proceedings Regarding Amazon.Com and A9.Com Only Pending Ruling By Court of Appeals and ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause therefore the Court hereby ORDERS: Discovery, motions, and all other proceedings in the above-entitled consolidated action against Amazon.com and A9.com only (Case 05-4753) shall be stayed until either i) the 9th Circuit issues a decision on Plaintiff's pending appeal from the Court's 2/22/06 order denying Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion against defendants Amazon.com or ii) a period of 10 months from the date that Plaintiff files it opening brief on appeal whichever comes first. (See document for further information)(dw, )
April 18, 2006157CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 filed by Google Inc, ; Court of Appeals Case Number: 06-55425. (ghap, )
April 17, 2006158MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court issues tentative Preliminary Injunction Order and questions counsel. The parties are to submit via email a red-lined version of the proposed preliminary injunction order. The parties are also advised of the possible retention of a court-appointed special advisor. Court orders the parties to meet and confer regarding a possible stay of discovery and to notify the Court of the outcome of their discussions. As a result of the pending appellate briefing schedule, the Court declines to set any pretrial and trial dates at this time.Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (smo, )
May 8, 2006161Court Opinion or Order PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS AND DECREES AS FOLLOWS: 1) Google is preliminarily enjoined from engaging in the infringing conduct described in the Initial Order. (See document for further information)(dw, )
May 22, 2006163Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION for Order for Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 (sbu, )
May 19, 2006164Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Plaintiff MOTION to Compel 109 (sbu, )
May 23, 2006165MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Plaintiff has previously indicated that it will not be filing a Motion to Stay Discovery. If Google intends to do so in the near future,it shall advise the court no later than June 1, 2006. If Google does not file a Motion to stay discovery in the near future, the court will proceed with the discovery matter which have previously been taken under submission.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, )
May 22, 2006168NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Appeal of Preliminary Injunction, 161 Filed On: 5/8/06; Entered On: 5/9/06; Filing fee $ 455 paid. cc: Jeffrey N. Mausner; Andrew P. Bridges; Mark T. Jansen (dmap, )
June 6, 2006169NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 06-55759, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court 168 filed by Perfect 10 Inc,. (dmap, )
June 8, 2006170Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Google's Ex Parte Application for an Order Modifying the Preliminary Injunction Order Entered 5/9/06 is DENIED. (smo, )
May 23, 2006175TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 4/17/06; Court Reporter: Leslie A. King; Court of Appeals Case Number: 06-55406; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 (ghap, )
June 5, 2006179Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting defendant Googles APPLICATION for Leave to File portion of ex parte to modify preliminary injunction order and declaration of Radhika Malpani under seal 177 (lc, )
June 7, 2006183PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Preliminary Injunction, 161 Filed On: 5/08/06; Entered On: 5/09/06; Filing fee $455; Paid; receipt number 85850. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman, Jeffrey N. Mausner, Daneil J. Cooper, Anthony J. Malutta (lr, )
June 15, 2006187MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS a temporary stay to permit Goodle to apply to the Ninth Circuit for a stay of the preliminary injunction. Stay shall remain in effect until 6/23/06. (See document for further information) RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Preliminary Injunction 185 Court Reporter: N/A. (dw, )
June 15, 2006192PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Order 170 Filed On: 6/08/06; Entered On: 06/08/06; Filing fee $455; Paid; receipt number 86116. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman, Jeffrey N. Mausner, Daniel J. Cooper (lr, )
July 10, 2006206NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number: 06-55877, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 192 filed by Google Inc. (lr, )
July 13, 2006207NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number: 06-55854, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 183 filed by Google Inc,. (lr, )
July 24, 2006208MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz : Court questions counsel, issues tentative ruling denying the above motion, and hears oral argument. For reasons and findings stated on the record, the Court DENIES the MOTION to Stay pending Discovery 180 . Court instructs counsel to file a proposed briefing schedule for upcoming discovery motions to be noticed before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. Court Reporter: Leslie A, King. (smo, )
August 16, 2006214MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman :, Set Hearings: Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/29/2006 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, )
July 11, 2007223Court Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Defendant Amazon.com's Notice of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Fourth received on the Fourth Claim, received on 7/11/07, is to be filed and processed. The filing date is Ordered to be the date the document was stamped received but not filed with the Clerk. (mg)
July 23, 2007226MINUTES of Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Proceedings: 1) Defendants Google Inc's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings 221 ; 2) Amazon.com Inc's and A9.com Inc's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Court issues tentative order without oral argument. For reasons and findings stated on the record, the Court GRANTS the above motions with prejudice. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg.(mg)
July 23, 2007227MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS ORDER) held before Judge A. Howard Matz: As in both IMS and Egilman, neither of the pleadings at issue here contains any allegation that the defendants accessed or provided access to Perfect 10's website by avoiding or bypassing technological measures designed to protect copyrighted work. As stated in IMS, "a cause of action under the DMCA does not accrue upon unauthorized and injurious access alone; rather, the DMCA `targets the circumvention of digital walls guarding copyrighted material.'"" IMS, 307 F.Supp.2d at 532 (emphasis in original). Thus, the conduct alleged in both pleadings fails to state a claim constituting "circumvention" under the DMCA. As a result, the Court GRANTS both Google's 221 and Amazon's motion. Instead of entering judgment on the pleadings, which invites procedural confusion, the Court dismisses the fourth causes of action with prejudice. (mg)
October 17, 2007234Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, GRANTING APPLICATION to file under seal the declaration of Radhika Malpani submitted in support of Google's opposition to perfect 10's motion to compel pursuant to protective order entered Dec. 27, 2005 229 , 233 . (ca)
November 5, 2007235NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Produce Documents - PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 11/19/2007 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Earlier Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents and to Answer Interrogatories)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
November 5, 2007236NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Produce Documents - DECLARATION OF DR. NORM ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 11/19/2007 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 10 - Google Trends Graph# 2 Exhibit Exhibit 11 - Overture search results# 3 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 1 - Google Analytics# 4 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 2 - Google Analytics# 5 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 3 - Google Analytics Terms# 6 Exhibit Exhibit 13 - FOOBR - Google Analytics# 7 Exhibit Exhibit 14 - E-mails# 8 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - page 1 - Ads by Google - Angelina Jolie# 9 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - page 2 - Ads by Google - Jennifer Lopez# 10 Exhibit Exhibit 16 - Excerpt from Defendant Google, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Third Set of Requests for Admissions# 11 Exhibit Exhibit 17 - Letter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals# 12 Exhibit Exhibit 17-1 - News Article - attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit# 13 Exhibit Exhibit 17-2 - Declaration of Offir Gutelzon in Support of Perfect 10's Reply Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction - attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit# 14 Exhibit Exhibit 17-3 - Printout of portion of website picscout.com re image recognition - attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
November 5, 2007237SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel 229 supplementing Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc.'s Opposition to the Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux)(Scherb, Matthew)
November 6, 2007238NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found incorrect document type selected: RE MOTION to Produce Documents - PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - 235 . (ca)
November 6, 2007239NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found incorrect document type selected: RE MOTION to Produce Documents - DECLARATION OF DR. NORM ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - 236 . (ca)
November 16, 2007240MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : re: MOTION to Compel 229 . Motion continued to 11/27/2007 at 9:30a.m. (sbu)
December 21, 2007242NOTICE of Association of Counsel Filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Zeller, Michael)
December 26, 2007243MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 123 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 168 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 131 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 192 , CCA # 06-55405, 06-55406, 06-55425, 06-55759, 06-55854 and 06-55877. The Judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded. Mandate received in this district on 12/28/2007. (dmap)
January 10, 2008244NOTICE Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Plaintiff filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Frackman, Russell)
November 27, 2007245MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : re: MOTION to Produce Documents 236 , MOTION to Produce Documents 235 . (sbu)
February 11, 2008246APPEAL RECORD RETURNED from 9th CCA Received: Volume(s): 1 through 11; Sealed Documents(s): 19; Transcripts(s): 4; RE: Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26) 217 (car)
February 14, 2008247NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Decl of Rachel M. Herrick re (Proposed) Order; Stipulation to File Under Seal; (Proposed) Order to File Under Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael)
February 14, 2008248DECLARATION of Rachel M. Herrick re (Proposed) Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-I to Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Zeller, Michael)
February 19, 2008249APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Scherb, Matthew)
February 20, 2008250NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found: Proposed Order not submitted as separate attachment as to APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. 249 (se)
February 20, 2008251Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: re APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. 249 , Attorney Jennifer A Golinveaux; Matthew Alex Scherb; Andrew P Bridges and Michael S Brophy terminated. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Winston & Strawn LLP and its attorneys Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb are authorized to withdraw as counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. in this action and shall hereby be considered withdrawn. (smo)
February 21, 2008252MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE ELECTRONIC FILING held before Judge A. Howard Matz (se)
February 21, 2008253NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rachel M Herrick on behalf of Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Herrick, Rachel)
February 22, 2008254Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel 229 (sbu)
March 5, 2008255STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Review of Nondispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge Hillman filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1)(Herrick, Rachel)
March 7, 2008256Court Opinion or Order ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File 255 : COURT HEREBY ORDERS that, to the extent each party files a motion for review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's ruling: Each party's Motion for Review shall be due on March 14, 2008. Each party's Opposition will be due on March 26, 2008. Each party's Reply will be due on April 4, 2008. The parties' Motions will be heard on April 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. (smo)
March 14, 2008257NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof re Order 254 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Proposed Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 14, 2008258NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128-131, 174, and 194-196 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc.Motion set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick Regarding Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008# 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 3 Exhibit Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 4 Exhibit Exhibit C to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 5 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Sustaining Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael)
March 14, 2008259Amendment to MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 26, 2008260NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Application to File Under Seal the Following Documents Which Contain Information Designated by Google as Confidential or Highly Confidential: Perfect 10's Memorandum in Opposition to Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel; Zada Declaration in Support Thereof. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 26, 2008261NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of [Proposed] Order that the Following Documents Which Contain Information Designated by Google as Confidential/Highly Confidential be Filed Under Seal: Perfect 10's Memorandum in Opposition to Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel; Zada Declaration in Support Thereof. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 26, 2008262NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel, which contains information designated Confidential or Highly Confidential by Google.. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 26, 2008263NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel, which contains information designated Confidential or Highly Confidential by Google. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
March 26, 2008264MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick Regarding Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008, and Exhibits A-H Thereto# 2 Proposed Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael)
March 28, 2008265SEALED DOCUMENT APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH CONTAIN INFORMATION WHICH GOOGLE HAS DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTAL OR HIGHLY CONFIDENTAL 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.,'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 20 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT THEREOF 254 filed by PLAINTIFF Perfect 10 Inc.Application set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (lra)
March 28, 2008266SEALED DOCUMENT ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH CONTAIN INFORMATION WHICH GOOGLE HAS DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTAL OR HIGHLY CONFIDENTAL 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.,'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 20 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT THEREOF 254 re APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 265 (lra)
March 28, 2008267SEALED DOCUMENT MEMORANDUM in Opposition to DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTION TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 , APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 265 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lra)
March 28, 2008268SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' PERFECT 10 INC'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTION TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 267 , Order 254 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lra)
April 4, 2008269NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick In Support Thereof; Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael)
April 4, 2008270REPLY In Support Of MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
April 4, 2008271DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of Reply for MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit 10# 4 Exhibit 11# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
April 4, 2008272DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of Reply for MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
April 4, 2008273REPLY Reply In Support of Motion First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128-131, 174, and 194-196 258 Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick In Support of Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael)
April 7, 2008274NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Corrected Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 (portions thereof filed under seal); Google Inc.'s Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael)
April 7, 2008275NOTICE OF ERRATA Regarding Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Google Inc.'s Corrected Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael)
April 7, 2008276APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc's Corrected Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in part Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
April 7, 2008277PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Notice of Errata 275 , APPLICATION to File Under Seal Corrected Reply 276 ; Proposed Order; Corrected Reply, served on 4/7/2008. (jp)
April 4, 2008278APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Exhibits A, E, F, and H to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof; and Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits thereto filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
April 4, 2008279PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Reply in support of its Objections; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick; Google Inc's Evidentiary Objections; APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Reply 278 ; Proposed Order served on 4/4/2008. (jp)
April 7, 2008280Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Exhibits A, E, F, and H to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof; and Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits thereto 278 . (jp)
April 9, 2008281NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections; Application to File Under Seal; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
April 9, 2008282APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Following Document which may contain information which Google has designated as confidential or highly confidential; Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
April 7, 2008283SEALED DOCUMENT - REPLY in support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in Part plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp)
April 7, 2008284SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of RACHEL M. HERRICK in support of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in Part plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp)
April 7, 2008285SEALED DOCUMENT - GOOGLE INC'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in support of Pertect 10, Inc's Opposition to Google Inc's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in part and Denying in part Pertect 10, Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp)
April 8, 2008286SEALED DOCUMENT - GOOGLE INC'S CORRECTED REPLY in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp)
April 9, 2008287Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING APPLICATION 282 . It is hereby Ordered that the following document be Filed Under Seal: Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections. (jp)
April 15, 2008288NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey D Goldman counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. Filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey D. Goldman (Goldman, Jeffrey)
April 14, 2008289MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court hears oral argument and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof re Order 254 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. 257 AND(2) First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128-131, 174, and 194-196 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. 258 . Defense counsel shall submit a proposed order.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se)
April 9, 2008290SEALED DOCUMENT - PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS. (jp)
May 6, 2008291STIPULATION for Disbursement of Funds to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order For Return of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Cash Bond# 2 Exhibit A - Receipt for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Cash Bond)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
May 7, 2008292NOTICE OF LODGING filed regarding (Proposed) Order on Google Inc.'s Objections to, and Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, Portions of the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Google Inc.'s Objections to, and Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, Portions of the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel)(Zeller, Michael)
May 8, 2008293Court Opinion or Order ORDER FOR RETURN OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.SCASH BOND by Judge A. Howard Matz: The parties having Stipulated 291 , that the principal amount of the Cash Bond in the amount of $100,000 currently on deposit with the United States District Court for the Central District of California in connection with the above-entitled case be returned to Perfect 10 forthwith, together with all accrued interest thereon to date. (jp)
May 13, 2008294Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Mat on Google Inc Objections To, and Perfect 10, Inc's MOTION for Review of, the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in Part and Denying In Part Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Compel, came on for hearing on April 14, 2008, the Honorable A. Howard Matz presiding. Jeffrey N. Mausner appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ("Perfect 10"). Michael T. Zeller and Rachel M. Herrick appeared on behalf of Defendant and Counterclaimant 257 . Upon consideration of all papers and records on file and the parties' oral argument, the Court orders as follows: Perfect 10's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order regarding Request Nos. 135, 136, and 137 are overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's Order regarding those Requests is AFFIRMED (see document for further details). GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS REGARDING REQUEST NO. 174. Google's objections are sustained in part and overruled in part. GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS REGARDING REQUEST NO. 196 Google's objections are overruled. (jp)
May 27, 2008295Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING MOTION for Leave to File The Amended Complaint. After consideration of the parties submissions and the arguments raised by the parties and defendants non-opposition to the Motion, the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc is deemed filed and served on 5/27/2008, upon the Defendants who have previously appeared in this action. (jp)
June 12, 2008296NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Changing firm name to Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008297NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 7/7/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008298DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008299EXHIBIT 5, Pages 1-28 to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 5, Part 1, Pages 1-28 to Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support Of Motion filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008300EXHIBIT 5, Pages 29-50 to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 5, Part 2, Pages 29-50 to Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support Of Motion filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008301DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, # 2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12, # 4 Exhibit 13, # 5 Exhibit 14, # 6 Exhibit 15, # 7 Exhibit 16, # 8 Exhibit 17, # 9 Exhibit 18, # 10 Exhibit 19, # 11 Exhibit 20, # 12 Exhibit 21, # 13 Exhibit 22, # 14 Exhibit 23)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008302NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Motion to File Second Amended Complaint (a CD-ROM). (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008303NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, re MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Second Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Second Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Second Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Second Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Second Amended Complaint, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Second Amended Complaint, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Second Amended Complaint, # 9 Exhibit 8)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008304EXHIBIT 4, Part I to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 4, Part I to [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008305EXHIBIT 4, Part II to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 4, Part II to [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 12, 2008306NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: account information was not updated in ECF system RE: Notice of Change of Attorney Information (G-06) 296 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (vh)
June 13, 2008307EXHIBIT 9 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in support of to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp)
June 18, 2008308EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Ex Parte Application, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application)(Herrick, Rachel)
June 19, 2008309PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DECLARATIONS OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER AND DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT THEREOF re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application 308 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
June 19, 2008310MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendant Google Inc.s ex parte application for a continuance of the July 7, 2008 hearing on Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendant has not established good cause for the five week continuance it requests. In light of Plaintiffs acquiescence to a one week continuance, the Court hereby continues the hearing date to July 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendants opposition is due June 30, 2008 and Plaintiffs reply is due July 7, 2008. (smo)
June 30, 2008311MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for Leave, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits A-G to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits H-Q to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit R (Part I) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit R (Part II) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 6 Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada, # 7 Proposed Order regarding Perfect 10's Motion for Leave)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 7, 2008312REPLY in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 7, 2008313DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 24, # 2 Exhibit 25, # 3 Exhibit 26, # 4 Exhibit 27, # 5 Exhibit 28, # 6 Exhibit 29)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 7, 2008314DECLARATION of Irina Voronina submitted in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 7, 2008315DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 30, # 2 Exhibit 31)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 14, 2008316MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 . Cause called; appearances made. Court circulates tentative order and questionnaire and hears oral argument. For reasons stated on the record, the Court takes plaintiffs motion UNDER SUBMISSION. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp)
July 14, 2008317REPLY MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 - Perfect 10's Reply to Additional Document Submitted by Google's Counsel at the Hearing on Perfect 10's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 15, 2008318Court Opinion or Order ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge A. Howard Matz that this matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 8/18/2008 at 01:30 PM. The conference will be held pursuant to FRCP 16(b). The parties reminded of their obligations under FRCP 26(a)(1) to disclose information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under Rule 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and to file a report with the Court entitled "Joint Rule 26(f) Report" not later than fourteen (14) days after they confer. Failure to comply with the following requirements or to cooperate in the preparation of the Joint Rule 26(f) Report may lead to the imposition of sanctions. (jp)
July 11, 2008319MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman:, ( Status Conference set for 7/14/2008 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.) (sbu)
July 14, 2008320MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court grants extension regarding outside attorney eyes only to August 1, 2008.Joint Stipulation shall be submitted to court on August 4, 2008. Court Smart: 7/14/2008. (sbu)
July 16, 2008321MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's FRCP 15(a) MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 , which would add certain new claims and new factual allegations. Defendant Google, Inc. ("Google") opposes this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion (see document for further details). (jp)
July 22, 2008322TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 7-14-08 1:27p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin CourtHouse Services, phone number 626-963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 8/12/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/22/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/20/2008. (bem, )
July 22, 2008323NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 7-14-08 1:27p.m. (bem, )
July 31, 2008324ANSWER to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit s A-E to Google's Answer to Perfect 10's Second Amended Complaint)(Zeller, Michael)
August 4, 2008325NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only - PUBLIC REDACTED filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick, # 2 Exhibit s A through F to the Herrick Declaration, # 3 Declaration of Chuck Rosenberg, # 4 Proposed Order Granting Google's Motion for Reconsideration of Protective Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
August 4, 2008326NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
August 4, 2008327DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Opposition To MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 4, 2008328DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 4, 2008329APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel Eyes Only filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Order. (jp)
August 4, 2008330PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Joint Stipulation 329 , Joint Stipulation, and Proposed Order served on 8/4/2008. (jp)
August 5, 2008331NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance ; Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance to Obtain Documents and Testimony from FoneStarz Media Limited filed by Defendant and Counterclaimaint Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/25/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support of Google's Motion for Issuance of a Letter of Request, and Exhibits A-D Thereto, # 2 (Proposed) Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance regarding FoneStarz Media Limited, # 3 Exhibit 1 to the (Proposed) Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance regarding FoneStarz Media Limited)(Herrick, Rachel)
August 5, 2008332Amendment to MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 ; Amended (Proposed) Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
August 4, 2008333Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, granting APPLICATION to Seal 329 (lra)
August 11, 2008334JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan - Joint Rule 16(b) Report ; estimated length of trial Perfect 10 - 12 days, Google - 20 days, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 15, 2008335NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation re. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof, and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
August 15, 2008336NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2008 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11)(Herrick, Rachel)
August 15, 2008337JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 - Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel, # 2 Exhibit A to the Herrick Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B to the Herrick Declaration - Public Redacted, # 4 Exhibit C to the Herrick Declaration, # 5 Exhibit D to the Herrick Declaration, # 6 Exhibit E to the Herrick Declaration, # 7 Exhibit F to the Herrick Declaration, # 8 Exhibit G to the Herrick Declaration)(Herrick, Rachel)
August 18, 2008338DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 18, 2008339DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Opposition To MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 19, 2008340AMENDED ANSWER - ANSWER OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. (NOT AMENDED ANSWER) filed by Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 20, 2008341MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: On Monday, the Court held a scheduling conference in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc. and Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. The Court elicited information on the status of Plaintiffs case against Microsoft Corporation, whose counsel was not present, and issued tentative rulings affecting that case, in an effort to coordinate discovery in all three related cases. The Court directed the parties to obtain a transcript and make it available to Microsofts counsel as soon as possible. See document. (se)
August 21, 2008342NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Changing e-mail to jeff@mausnerlaw.com. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 19, 2008343Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman,granting Google Inc's Application to File Under seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation re: Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos 3 and 11 and Portions of Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support Thereof (lra)
August 19, 2008344SEALED DOCUMENT - JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed(lra)
August 19, 2008345SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of RACHEL M. HERRICK IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed (lra)
August 18, 2008346MINUTES OF Further Scheduling Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Chief Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman is present. Court questions counsel about outstanding discovery issues. Court informs counsel that it is inclined to appoint a special discovery master and that each side would be expected to propose an appropriate candidate. Case scheduling order to issue. The stipulation and order regarding the copyright cut-off date is due one week after the Court issues its scheduling order.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se)
August 25, 2008347MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11, # 2 Exhibit A to the Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Herrick, Rachel)
August 26, 2008348MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court GRANTS Microsofts Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Comply With August 20, 2008 Order and For Telephonic Status Conference. Counsel shall have until September 4, 2008 to submit their joint recommendations concerning a Discovery Master. The Court will hold a telephonic status conference on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. to allow Microsoft to convey its position as to the matters discussed at the August 18, 2008 hearing. (kbr).
August 26, 2008349NOTICE of Association of Counsel Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 29, 2008350STATUS REPORT of Perfect 10's Court Ordered List Re (1) Pending Discovery Motions, (2) Discovery Motions That Are Currently Contemplated and (3) Discovery Disputes That Are Reasonably Likely to Arise Within The Next Nine Months filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 29, 2008351STATEMENT Regarding Google Inc.'s List of Pending and Contemplated Discovery Motions (Zeller, Michael)
August 12, 2008352PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Joint Stipulation re Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel,, 337 ; Declaration of Rachel M. herrick; application to file Under Seal; Proposed Order granting application to file under seal served on 8/15/2008 by personal service. (ca)
September 4, 2008353JOINT REPORT of Proposal Regarding Discovery Master filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
September 5, 2008354MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Motion to Compel Answer to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc Google Inc Motion to Compel further Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 3 and 11 set for hearing on September 8, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby taken off calendar, re: MOTION 336 . (ca)
August 27, 2008355MINUTES OF Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Cause called; appearances made. Also present is the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman, Magistrate Judge. Court questions Microsofts counsel regarding the current status of the case and the feasability of coordinating the discovery between all three related actions. The Court is provided with Microsoft's position on the matters discussed at the last hearing between plaintiff Perfect 10 and defendants Google and Amazon.com. Court authorizes Magistrate Judge Hillman to take off calendar all pending motions currently scheduled for hearing on 9/8/2008. Court and counsel discuss whether or not to separate the three issues contemplated in A9's forthcoming summary judgment motion into separate motions. The Court agrees that the Safe Harbor issue can be distilled in another motion whereas the direct and vicarious infringement issues should remain in a single motion. Court orders the parties to order a transcript of this hearing. The cost is to be split four ways. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp)
September 16, 2008356NOTICE Notice of Withdrawal As Counsel For Plaintiff filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order re Notice of Withdrawal)(Frackman, Russell)
September 18, 2008357NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 22, 2008358Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, GRANTING GOOGLE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FURTHER DECLARATION OF CHARLES ROSENBERG IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION. Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 357 (sbu)
September 18, 2008359APPLICATION to File Under Seal the further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in support of Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only, filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
September 18, 2008360PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal 359 , Proposed Order, Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg served on 9/18/2008. (jp)
September 17, 2008361Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Withdrawal 356 of Rusell J. Frackman as counsel for plaintiff; plaintiff is represented by Jeffrey N. Mauser, counsel of record. (se)
September 25, 2008363MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court does not intend to appoint either a technical advisor or adiscovery master at this time (see document for further details). Accordingly, the Court has determined that a further conference with counsel in all three cases is necessary. Court ORDERS the parties in all these cases to appear for a Status Conference set for 10/6/2008 at 1:30 PM. (jp)
October 5, 2008364STATEMENT of Perfect 10 for October 6, 2008 Case Management Conference Before Judge Matz filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set Hearings, 363 . (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 8, 2008365MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Having considered the parties arguments in the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsels Eyes Only (the Motion), and the Supplemental Declaration of Charles Rosenberg, and good cause having been shown, the Motion is hereby partially granted, 325 . Documents with Bates Range GGL 0334466 - GGL 033486 may be viewed by Dr. Zada in Mr. Mausners office only, and under his direct supervision. These documents relate to a 2004 Power Point Presentation. The remaining documents cited by Mr. Rosenberg relate only to 2006 - 2008 Power Point Presentations. The Motion is granted as to those documents. As the litigation progresses, this ruling might be subject to modification for good cause shown, namely a particularized need of Dr. Zada to review those documents. (ca)
October 20, 2008366MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Disclosure of Confidential Information has been taken under submission, and is DENIED. No good cause has been shown to prohibit Mr. Chumura from access to confidential and highly confidential material. (pcl)
October 22, 2008367NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel, Sean E. Macias, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 23, 2008368Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Motion for partial summary judgment set for hearing on 12/8/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (se)
October 24, 2008369Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to the Notice of Withdrawal As Counsel for Plaintiff, and with the consent of Plaintiff 367 , that Macias Counsel, Inc. and Sean E. Macias, Esq., are removed as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. Plaintiff is currently represented by the Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner, attorneys of record for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (jp)
October 6, 2008370MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz:Court and counsel confer regarding the status of all three cases. Court orders Messrs. Zeller and Mausner to meet and confer regarding URLs v. DMCs. Parties are to file a status report which should include a proposal for a future telephonic status conference. Parties are instructed to obtain a transcript of this hearing and to split the cost four ways.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se)
October 27, 2008371NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/17/2008 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 27, 2008372JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
October 27, 2008373DECLARATION of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C (Part 1), # 4 Exhibit C (Part 2), # 5 Exhibit D (Part 1), # 6 Exhibit D (Part 2), # 7 Exhibit D (Part 3), # 8 Exhibit D (Part 4), # 9 Exhibit D (Part 5), # 10 Exhibit D (Part 6), # 11 Exhibit E, # 12 Exhibit F, # 13 Exhibit G, # 14 Exhibit H)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 28, 2008374DECLARATION of Valerie Kincaid In Support of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Portions of the Joint Stipulation - MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 31, 2008375STATEMENT Regarding the Court's Minute Order Regarding the Status Conference of October 6, 2008 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc ; Statement by Google Inc. re: Status Conference, 370 . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Zeller, Michael)
November 3, 2008376MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Resposes to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2, # 2 Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Herrick, Rachel)
November 4, 2008377MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: re: MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 . Hearing set for 11/17/2008 is vacated. If a hearing is necessary, the court will set a new date. (sbu)
November 15, 2008378MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS AMENDED ORDER RE ELECTRONIC FILING before Judge A. Howard Matz: Effective January 1, 2008, electronic filing has been mandatory for most new and pending civil cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Self-represented litigants and attorneys who take appropriate steps to opt out of the system need not comply with the following requirements. All documents which are required to be filed in an electronic format pursuant to General Order No. 08-03 must be filed electronically no later than midnight on the date due, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Documents filed late may be stricken by the Court. The Court will not accept documents which were filed electronically, but which otherwise fail to comply with filing requirements. (See document for further details). (jp)
November 17, 2008379DECLARATION of Michael T. Zeller in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Improper Request for Stay, and Request for Sanctions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Michael T. Zeller)(Zeller, Michael)
November 14, 2008380JOINT LETTER from Jeffrey N. Mausner, attorneys for Perfect 10, and Michael T. Zeller, attorneys for Google. (pcl)
November 24, 2008381MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The hearing date of December 1, 2008, before Magistrate Judge Hillman is vacated. No other dates are set at this juncture. (pcl)
November 25, 2008382TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 7/14/08 11 am. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy)
November 25, 2008383TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8/18/08 2:28 PM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy)
November 25, 2008384TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8/27/08 4:06 PM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy)
November 25, 2008385TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 10/6/08 1:43 PM. Court Reporter Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy)
November 25, 2008386TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 10/27/08 11:13 AM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy)
December 2, 2008387MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE RE. CASE MANAGEMENT. The Court orders the parties in all three of the Perfect 10 cases to appear for a Status Conference on 12/18/2008 at 3:00 PM. The Court intends to issue an "Order Re Management of Perfect 10 v. Microsoft and Staying Related Actions." (See Tentative Order below.) The parties may respond in writing to the Courts tentative order by not later than 12/12/2008. No replies to response may be filed. (See document for further details). (jp)
December 3, 2008388NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 7/14/08 11 am (Nirenberg, Cindy)
December 3, 2008389NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8/18/08 2:28 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy)
December 3, 2008390NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8/27/08 4:06 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy)
December 3, 2008391NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 10/6/08 1:43 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy)
December 12, 2008392NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael)
December 12, 2008393RESPONSE filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set Hearings,, 387 Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-M Thereto)(Zeller, Michael)
December 12, 2008394Perfect 10's Response to Judge Matz's December 2, 2008 Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set Hearings,, 387 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-4)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
December 12, 2008395Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Honorable A. Howard Matz, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94 ), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay, and Exhibits thereto (the "Roberts Declaration"), is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Roberts Declaration is hereby ordered filed under seal. (jp)
December 12, 2008396GOOGLE INC.'S APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in support of Google Inc's Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008, and Opposition to Contemplated Stay filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
December 12, 2008397DECLARATION of Thomas D. Nolan filed by Defendant Google Inc. re technical failures in the ECF system resulting in Google Inc.'s inability to electronically file the Notice of Manual Filing of Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts, Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal, and Proof of Service. (se)
December 12, 2008398PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Declaration, Application, Proposed Order 397 served on 12/12/08. (se)
December 22, 2008400MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court ORDERS that Perfect 10 shall select the factual and legal combinations that it will pursue using the list in Exhibit C to the attached Joint Status Report. This must be done by not later than 1/5/2009 (see document for further details). Perfect 10 shall provide this information in a spreadsheet format, preferably using the same spreadsheet referred to above, and shall provide the information to Microsoft by not later than 1/20/2009. The Court sets 8/11/2009 at the trial date. The scheduling order dated 2/11/2008 is vacated. (jp)
December 18, 2008401MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court orders Mr. Mausner to provide the exact number of "combinations" to the Court by not later than December 19, 2008. Order to issue. Court orders that parties to agree on a sequence of pending motions but intends to start with A9's motion. The Court will not accept any further papers on plaintiff's fully briefed motions for summary judgment. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (jp)
February 11, 2009402TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12-18-08, 3:08 P.M. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber, phone number (213) 613-0179, www.leandraamber.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/4/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/14/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/12/2009. (Amber, Leandra)
February 11, 2009403NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 12-18-08, 3:08 p.m. (Amber, Leandra)
February 12, 2009404MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance 331 is VACATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Google may renew this motion before Judge Hillman after the stay is lifted. (jp)
May 1, 2009405REQUEST for Hearing as to Pending Discovery Motions re MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 , MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Setting Hearing on Google Inc.'s Pending Discovery Motions)(Herrick, Rachel)
May 7, 2009406NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation re. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Compliance with Protective Order, and Bates-Stamping; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support thereof, and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
May 7, 2009407NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2009 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions)(Herrick, Rachel)
May 7, 2009408JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Part 1 of 2) (Public Redacted) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions (Part 2 of 2), # 2 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel (Public Redacted), # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit S, # 22 Exhibit T, # 23 Exhibit U, # 24 Exhibit V, # 25 Exhibit W, # 26 Exhibit X, # 27 Exhibit Y, # 28 Exhibit Z, # 29 Exhibit AA, # 30 Exhibit BB, # 31 Exhibit CC, # 32 Exhibit DD, # 33 Exhibit EE, # 34 Exhibit FF, # 35 Exhibit GG, # 36 Exhibit HH, # 37 Exhibit II, # 38 Exhibit JJ, # 39 Exhibit KK, # 40 Exhibit LL (Part 1 of 2), # 41 Exhibit LL (Part 2 of 2), # 42 Exhibit MM, # 43 Exhibit NN, # 44 Exhibit OO, # 45 Exhibit PP, # 46 Exhibit QQ, # 47 Exhibit RR, # 48 Exhibit SS, # 49 Exhibit TT)(Herrick, Rachel)
May 7, 2009409DECLARATION OF VALERIE KINCAID IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S PORTIONS OF THE JOINT STIPULATION RE GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO (1) PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, (2) TO COMPLY WITH PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND (3) TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion,,,,,, 408 (Mausner, Jeffrey)
May 8, 2009410NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for Order Setting a Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions)(Herrick, Rachel)
May 8, 2009411NOTICE OF MOTION AND Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions)(Zeller, Michael)
May 7, 2009412APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation re, Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply With Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to Its Document Production and Portions of the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support thereof Order filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
May 12, 2009413Court Opinion or Order ORDER GRANTING Google Inc.'s Application to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation Re Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply with Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to Its Document Production and Portions of the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Accordingly, the Confidential Materials are hereby ordered filed under seal. (See document for further details.) (pcl)
May 14, 2009414MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google Inc's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Perfect 10 ( 1) to produce documents (2) to Comply with protective order, and (3) to affix document control number to its document production 407 filed on May 7, 2009 and set for hearing on June 1, 2009 is hereby taken off calendar. (pcl)
May 14, 2009415Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendant Google Inc's Request for Oral Argument on Pending Discovery Motions 405 is hereby DENIED. (pcl)
May 14, 2009416MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The action entitled Perfect 10, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, CV 07-5156 AHM (SHx) has been dismissed and is no longer subject to the order dated December 22, 2008, including Section A (Consolidation). (kbr)
May 17, 2009417PERFECT 10'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT in Opposition to re: Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
May 17, 2009418DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, in Opposition to Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
May 17, 2009419DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, in Opposition to Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
May 18, 2009420MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply with the Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel)
May 22, 2009421REPLY in support of Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Reply Regarding Google Inc.'s Motion for an Order Setting a Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions, and Exhibits A-C Thereto)(Zeller, Michael)
May 29, 2009422MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Courts own motion, the Court hereby takes OFF-CALENDAR andUNDER SUBMISSION Defendants Motion for Order for Schedule for the Filing ofDispositive Motions [410, 411]. The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (smo)
July 2, 2009423NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), & (d); Separate Statements in Support Thereof; Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala, Paul Haahr, Bill Brougher, and Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits Thereto; Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009424NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Notice of Lodging of Non-Documentary Exhibits to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d); portions of Exhibits N1-N11 and N14-N15 Thereto. (Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009425NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Notice of Lodging of Non-Documentary Exhibit II to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d); Exhibit II Thereto (DVD filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order). (Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009426NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009427NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009428NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009429DECLARATION of Sibrina Khan in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009430DECLARATION of Bill Brougher in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009431DECLARATION of Paul Haahr in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009432DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L1, # 13 Exhibit L2, # 14 Exhibit L3, # 15 Exhibit L4, # 16 Exhibit L5, # 17 Exhibit L6, # 18 Exhibit L7, # 19 Exhibit L8, # 20 Exhibit L9, # 21 Exhibit L10, # 22 Exhibit L11, # 23 Exhibit L12, # 24 Exhibit L13, # 25 Exhibit L14, # 26 Exhibit L15, # 27 Exhibit L16, # 28 Exhibit L17)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009433DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 1 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS A - L39) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L1, # 13 Exhibit L2, # 14 Exhibit L3, # 15 Exhibit L4, # 16 Exhibit L5, # 17 Exhibit L6, # 18 Exhibit L7, # 19 Exhibit L8, # 20 Exhibit L9, # 21 Exhibit L10, # 22 Exhibit L11, # 23 Exhibit L12, # 24 Exhibit L13, # 25 Exhibit L14, # 26 Exhibit L15, # 27 Exhibit L16, # 28 Exhibit L17, # 29 Exhibit L18, # 30 Exhibit L19, # 31 Exhibit L20, # 32 Exhibit L21, # 33 Exhibit L22, # 34 Exhibit L23, # 35 Exhibit L24, # 36 Exhibit L25, # 37 Exhibit L26, # 38 Exhibit L27, # 39 Exhibit L28, # 40 Exhibit L29, # 41 Exhibit L30, # 42 Exhibit L31, # 43 Exhibit L32, # 44 Exhibit L33, # 45 Exhibit L34, # 46 Exhibit L35, # 47 Exhibit L36, # 48 Exhibit L37, # 49 Exhibit L38, # 50 Exhibit L39)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009434DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 2 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS L40 - N17) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit L40, # 2 Exhibit L41, # 3 Exhibit L42, # 4 Exhibit L43, # 5 Exhibit L44, # 6 Exhibit L45, # 7 Exhibit L46, # 8 Exhibit L47, # 9 Exhibit L48, # 10 Exhibit M, # 11 Exhibit N1, # 12 Exhibit N2, # 13 Exhibit N3, # 14 Exhibit N4, # 15 Exhibit N5, # 16 Exhibit N6, # 17 Exhibit N7, # 18 Exhibit N8, # 19 Exhibit N9, # 20 Exhibit N10, # 21 Exhibit N11, # 22 Exhibit N12, # 23 Exhibit N13 Part 1, # 24 Exhibit N13 Part 2, # 25 Exhibit N13 Part 3, # 26 Exhibit N14, # 27 Exhibit N15, # 28 Exhibit N16 Part 1, # 29 Exhibit N16 Part 2, # 30 Exhibit N16 Part 3(a), # 31 Exhibit N16 Part 3(b), # 32 Exhibit N16 Part 4, # 33 Exhibit N16 Part 5, # 34 Exhibit N16 Part 6, # 35 Exhibit N16 Part 7, # 36 Exhibit N16 Part 8, # 37 Exhibit N16 Part 9, # 38 Exhibit N16 Part 10, # 39 Exhibit N16 Part 11, # 40 Exhibit N16 Part 12, # 41 Exhibit N16 Part 13, # 42 Exhibit N16 Part 14, # 43 Exhibit N16 Part 15, # 44 Exhibit N16 Part 16, # 45 Exhibit N16 Part 17, # 46 Exhibit N16 Part 18, # 47 Exhibit N16 Part 19, # 48 Exhibit N16 Part 20, # 49 Exhibit N16 Part 21, # 50 Exhibit N16 Part 22, # 51 Exhibit N17)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 2, 2009435DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 3 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS N18 - PP) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit N18 Part 1, # 2 Exhibit N18 Part 2, # 3 Exhibit N18 Part 3, # 4 Exhibit N18 Part 4, # 5 Exhibit N18 Part 5, # 6 Exhibit N18 Part 6, # 7 Exhibit N18 Part 7, # 8 Exhibit N18 Part 8, # 9 Exhibit N18 Part 9, # 10 Exhibit N18 Part 10, # 11 Exhibit O, # 12 Exhibit P, # 13 Exhibit Q, # 14 Exhibit R Part 1, # 15 Exhibit R Part 2, # 16 Exhibit R Part 3, # 17 Exhibit S, # 18 Exhibit T, # 19 Exhibit U, # 20 Exhibit V, # 21 Exhibit W, # 22 Exhibit X, # 23 Exhibit Y, # 24 Exhibit Z, # 25 Exhibit AA, # 26 Exhibit BB, # 27 Exhibit CC, # 28 Exhibit DD, # 29 Exhibit EE, # 30 Exhibit FF, # 31 Exhibit GG, # 32 Exhibit HH, # 33 Exhibit II, # 34 Exhibit JJ, # 35 Exhibit KK, # 36 Exhibit LL, # 37 Exhibit MM, # 38 Exhibit NN, # 39 Exhibit OO, # 40 Exhibit PP)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 5, 2009436NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order GRANTING PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 5, 2009437STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, for Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Against Google, Inc. MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 5, 2009438DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-7, # 2 Exhibit 8-13, # 3 Exhibit 14-18, # 4 Exhibit 19-23, # 5 Exhibit 24-27, # 6 Exhibit 28-39, # 7 Exhibit 40-47, # 8 Exhibit 48-53)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009439DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009440DECLARATION of Sheena Chou In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009441DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009442DECLARATION of Sean Chumura In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009443DECLARATION of David O'Connor In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009444DECLARATION of Dean Hoffman In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009445DECLARATION of C.J. Newton In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009446NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; AND 2) NOTICE OF LODGING OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009447NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of DISK CONTAINING EXHIBIT 9 TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE [DISK ATTACHED]; AND EXHIBIT G TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
July 6, 2009448APPLICATION to FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr)
July 6, 2009449NOTICE OF LODGING OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. Plaintiff hereby lodges the following documents: Disk containing Exhibit 9 to the Declararion of Norman Zada; Exhibit G to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner. (kbr)
July 2, 2009450GOOGLE INC APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp)
July 2, 2009451PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and Supporting Documents 450 , Proposed Order, Notice of Motiona nd Motion for Summary Judgment, Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC section 512(b) for its Caching Feature, Declarations of Paul Haahr, Rachel Herrick Kassabian, Shantal Rands Poovala, Bill Brougher, Notice of Loding of Non-Documentary Exhibits to the Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala, Statements of Uncontrverted Facts and Conclusions of Law served on 7/2/2009. (jp)
July 7, 2009452EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Schedule for Dispositive Motions Defendant Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application re: Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication re: Copyright Infringement Against Defendant Google Inc. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
July 8, 2009453Court Opinion or Order MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS, nunc pro tunc, Googles Motion for Order for Schedule forFiling Dispositive Motions for the reasons stated in Googles briefs.1 In addition, theCourt STAYS further briefing on Perfect 10's just-filed motion for summary judgment(Docket No. 436) until further order of the Court. The August 17, 2009 hearing forPerfect 10's motion is vacated.The Court is aware that Google decided to file its three DMCA motions, noticedfor August 17, 2009, without awaiting the Courts order on its motion. AlthoughGoogles filing of the DMCA motions before the Courts order exhibited gamesmanship -- i.e., it gives the appearance of Google racing to the courthouse at the same time it waspurporting to seek the Courts guidance on an orderly sequence of the filing of motions --Google did not violate any Court order.The Court also notes that the parties have not proposed deadlines for oppositionand reply briefs. The Court requires the oppositions to Googles DMCA motions to befiled by July 27, 2009 and the replies to be filed by August 3, 2009. (smo)
July 8, 2009454Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz DENIED Ex Parte Application Re Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Re Copyright Infringement against Defendant Google Inc 452 . (jp)
July 7, 2009455NOTICE OF LODGING of Non-Documentary Exhibit II to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp)
July 7, 2009463Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and supporting Documents 450 . (jp)
July 7, 2009464Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Documents in support of Perfect 10's Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication against Google 448 . (jp)
July 9, 2009465STIPULATION for Order BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. 512(B), (C) & (D) filed by Defendant Google Inc.(Herrick, Rachel)
July 10, 2009470Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to Stipulation 465 , it is ordered as follows: (1) Perfect 10 Opposition to Google Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC section 512(b), (c) and (d) shall be due on 8/10/2009; Google Reply papers in support of DMCA Motions shall bedue on 9/8/2009; The Hearing on Google DMCA MOTIONS 426 , 427 , 428 , 456 , 457 , and 458 shall be set for on 10/5/2009, or such other hearing date as is convenient for the Court. (jp)
July 27, 2009471NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits A-E Thereto, # 2 Proposed Order)(Zeller, Michael)
August 3, 2009472MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009473NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of (1) Application to File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); (2) [Proposed] Order Granting Perfect 10's Application to File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); (3) Notice of Lodging of Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); and Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009474NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of (1) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(c) For Its Blogger Service; (2) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(d) For Web And Image Search; (3) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(b) For Its Caching Feature; (4) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service; (5) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search; (6) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature; (7) Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web And Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, And 426) (Including Exhs 1-26 And 27-53); (8) Exhibit 9, A Disk, to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); and (9) Exhibits G, H, K, N, and P to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426). (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009475DECLARATION of Margaret Jane Eden in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009476DECLARATION of Dean Hoffman in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009477DECLARATION of CJ Newton in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009478DECLARATION of Les Schwartz in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009479DECLARATION of Sean Chumura in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009480DECLARATION of David O'Connor in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009481DECLARATION of Bennett McPhatter in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009482DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009483DECLARATION of Sheena Chou in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2009484DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
August 10, 2009485REPLY in support of MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Zeller, Michael)
August 10, 2009486NOTICE OF LODGING of Documents submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Habor for Its Web and Image Serach, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426) filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp)
August 10, 2009487APPLICATION to File Under Seal Documents Submtited in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Habor for Its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426) filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
August 11, 2009496SEALED DOCUMENT - Perfect 10's STATEMENT of genuine issues in Opposition to Google's MOTION for Summary Judgment RE: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(b) For Its Caching Feature filed (lra)
August 11, 2009499Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 487 Application to Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment. (kbr)
August 13, 2009500MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby takes OFF-CALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION (1) Defendant's Google's Motion for Summary Judgment 456 ; and (2) Defendant Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Blogger Service 457 ; (3) Defendant Googles Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Entitlement to Safe Harbor 458 ; and and Defendant Google's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 . The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (jp)
August 26, 2009501MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendant Google's (1) Motion to Compel Answer to Interrogatories, filed August 15, 2008 (docket number #336); (2) Motion Request for Admission, filed October 27, 2008 (docket number # 371); and (3) Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to produce documents to comply with Protective Order and to affix documents control numbers, filed on May 7, 2009 (docket number #409) are all rescheduled to be heard on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Hillman. (es)
September 8, 2009502NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Defendant Google Inc.'s Replies in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512; Consolidated Separate Statements in Support Thereof; Rebuttal Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala and Bill Brougher in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009503REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009504REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009505REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009506DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009507EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sheena Chou in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009508EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sean Chumura in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009509EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Margaret Jane Eden in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009510EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dean Hoffman in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009511EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Jeffrey Mausner in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009512EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Bennett McPhatter in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009513EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of C.J. Newton in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009514EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of David O'Connor in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009515EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Les Schwartz in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009516EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Melanie Poblete in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 9, 2009517DECLARATION of Bill Brougher in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 9, 2009518DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Herrick, Rachel)
September 9, 2009519EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 9, 2009520STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) for its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 9, 2009521STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) for Web and Image Search (PART 1) [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) for Web and Image Search (PART 2) [Public Redacted])(Herrick, Rachel)
September 10, 2009522NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) for its Blogger Service; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 10, 2009523STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) for its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 8, 2009524APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Replies in Support of Its Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Google Inc. (kbr)
September 9, 2009525Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 524 Application to Seal Portions of Google's Replies in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment. (kbr)
September 8, 2009526CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc. Documents related to Motion for Summary Judgment served on 9/8/09. (kbr)
September 3, 2009527MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court sets a Telephonic Conference for September 4, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. (pcl)
September 4, 2009528MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Court and Counsel confer. Court sets a further Telephonic Conference for September 14, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. Court Recorder: CS 9/8/09. (pcl)
September 10, 2009535GOOGLE INC.'S APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(c) for its Blogger Service filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
September 10, 2009536PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law 535 , Proposed Order, Corrected Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts, served on 9/10/2009. (jp)
September 11, 2009537Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(c) for its Blogger Service 535 . (jp)
September 14, 2009538MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court and Counsel confer. Discovery hearing set for September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. will be Telephonic. Tape #: 09/14/09. (pcl)
September 18, 2009539MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Telephonic Hearing is hereby cancelled. Parties shall appear in Courtroom 550 on the 5th floor on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for the Discovery Hearing. (pcl)
September 21, 2009540DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 , MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of (1) Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, to Comply with the Protective Order and to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production, and (2) Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google's Requests for Admission filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Herrick, Rachel)
September 22, 2009541MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman:Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Court and Counsel confer. Parties shall submitproposed order as to the ruling stated in open court.Court Reporter: CS9/22/09. (sbu)
September 25, 2009542Court Opinion or Order ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting in part and denying in part 371 Motion for Admissions. Perfect 10 is ordered to respond as specified above by December 31, 2009. (sbu)
September 29, 2009543SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Herrick, Rachel)
September 29, 2009544NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production; Notice of Lodging of Non-documentary Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
September 30, 2009545NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 1, 2009546NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.s Motion To Compel Perfect 10 To Produce Complete And Unredacted Financial Documents And Other Damages-Related Documents, And Amazon.Com and Alexa Internets Joinder Therein re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10 To Produce Complete And Unredacted Financial Documents And Other Damages-Related Documents, And Amazon.Com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 1, 2009547PERFECT 10'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE: SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ("SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL KASSABIAN DECL.") (DOCKET NO. 543-2) re: MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543-2 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 1, 2009548REPLY TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO AFFIX CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 1, 2009549DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN REPLY TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO AFFIX CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION; re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 1, 2009550DECLARATION of MELANIE POBLETE IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION (DOCKET NO. 543); re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
September 30, 2009551PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel herrick Kassabia, Notice of Lodging, served on 9/30/2009. (jp)
October 1, 2009552DECLARATION of MELANIE POBLETE (SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION) IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION (DOCKET NO. 543); re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 5, 2009553RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Objections to Evidence re: Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel)
October 5, 2009554NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10, Inc. To Comply With The Protective Order re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10, Inc. To Comply With The Protective Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 5, 2009555NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 of [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION RE CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS AND BATE STAMPING DOCUMENTS, re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION RE CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS AND BATE STAMPING DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 6, 2009558NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 9/04/09 3:15pm and 9/22/09 10:02am,11:21am,1:35pm,2:52pm (Lopez, Margarita)
October 7, 2009559NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Notice of Lodging of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions; Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel)
October 6, 2009560Court Opinion or Order ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND AMAZON.COM AND ALEXA INTERNET'S JOINDER THEREIN by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Google's Motion and the Amazon Defendants' joinder therein is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: (See document for further details.) (pcl)
October 6, 2009561Court Opinion or Order ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Google's Motion and Amazon.com and Alexa.com's Joinder Application is GRANTED IN PART, as follows: (See document for further details.) (pcl)
October 7, 2009562NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of Non-Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 64 to the deposition of Google Inc. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6), dated November 19, 2008, # 2 Exhibit 66 to the deposition of Google Inc. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6), dated November 19, 2008)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 8, 2009563MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court set a Telephonic Conference for October 9, 2009 at 2: 30 p.m. (pcl)
October 12, 2009564EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in Opposition to re: MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009565OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF SEAN CHUMURA, BENNETT MCPHATTER AND DAVID OCONNOR RE: GOOGLES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009566OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF MARGARET JANE EDEN, DEAN HOFFMAN, C.J. NEWTON, AND LES SCHWARTZ RE: GOOGLES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009567OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF SHEENA CHOU RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009568OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY MAUSNER RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009569OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF MELANIE POBLETE RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009570OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S REDACTED REPLY TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA RE: GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009571DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009572NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF BILL BROUGHER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512; 2) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR, DOCKET NOS. 467-469, 534 (UNDER SEAL); 3) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS: DECLARATION OF PAUL HAAHR IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512; 4) PERFECT 10'S REPLY TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA. 5) EXHIBITS AA & BB TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; 6) DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS; 7) NOTICE OF LODGING OF PLEADINGS RE PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and 8) PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 12, 2009573EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC'S EXHIBITS FROM THE SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY ISSUES BEFORE JUDGE HILLMAN as to Miscellaneous Document,, 409 , Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion,,,,,, 408 . (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 13, 2009574NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Application To File Under Seal Pleadings Re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections And Responses To Google's Evidentiary Objections Re Google's Three Motions For Summary Judgment; and [Proposed] Order Thereon. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 7, 2009575APPLICATION To File Under Seal Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order and 2 Under Seal Documents. (pcl)
October 7, 2009576NOTICE OF LODGING Of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions filed by defendant Google Inc. (pcl)
October 7, 2009577PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions 575 , Notice of Lodging of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits 576 , [Proposed] Order Granting Application to File Under Seal Confidential Exhibits (see document for further details), served on October 7, 2009. (pcl)
October 7, 2009578Court Opinion or Order ORDER GRANTING Google Inc.'s Application To File Under Seal Confidential Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: That application 575 is hereby GRANTED. The Confidential Exhibits include materials that Perfect 10 has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that the Confidential Exhibits be filed under seal. (pcl)
October 13, 2009579APPLICATION to File Udner Seal Pleadings re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections and Responses to google's Evidentiary Objections re Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
October 13, 2009580NOTICE OF LODGING of Pleadings re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections and Responses to Google's Evidentiary Objections re Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff. (jp)
October 13, 2009581PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Evidentiary Objections to Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher, Evidentiary Objections to Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration fo Shantal Rands Poovala, Evidentiary Objection Declaration of Paul Haahr, Reply to Evidentiary Objections, Exhibits AA & BB tot he Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner, Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada, Notice of Lodging, Application to File Under Seal Pleadings, Proposed order, served on 10/13/2009. (jp)
October 13, 2009582Court Opinion or Order ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL PLEADINGS RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, granting 579 Application to Seal Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 572 . (se)
October 21, 2009589NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC'S UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS FROM THE SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY ISSUES BEFORE JUDGE HILLMAN; Application & Proposed Order to file the same; NOTICE OF LODGING. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 21, 2009590REQUEST to Clarify re: the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibit A Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel)
October 23, 2009591REPLY REQUEST to Clarify re: the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet 590 , PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE INC.'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION RE: THE ORDER COMPELLING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND AMAZON.COM AND ALEXA INTERNETS JOINDER THEREIN, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUNSER IN RESPONSE TO GOOGLE INC.'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION RE: THE ORDER COMPELLING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey)
October 23, 2009593Court Opinion or Order ORDER to File Under Seal Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Under Seal Exhibits From the September 22, 2099 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (es)
October 22, 2009594APPLICATION to File Under Seal Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., Under Seal Exhibits From the September 22, 2009 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (es)
October 22, 2009595NOTICE OF LODGING Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Under Seal Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman; and Proposed Order to File Under Seal filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc 594 , 593 (es)
November 2, 2009596EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Production and to Reimburse Defendants for Costs and Request for a Telephonic Conference, and Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition Thereto filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel)
November 2, 2009597MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google's Request for Clarification Re October 6, 2009 Order 590 : At the present time, the court will confirm the language and intent of the Order quoted above. Actual settlement agreements between Perfect 10 and third parties need not be produced. (See document for further details.) (pcl)
November 3, 2009598PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S IMPROPER EX PARTE APPLICATION in Opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey)
November 6, 2009599NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Google Inc. of (Proposed) Order Granting in Part Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Production and to Reimburse Defendants for Costs and Request for a Telephonic Conference, and Google Inc.'s Joinder Therein re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel)
November 6, 2009600SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application and Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition Thereto filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel)
Search for this case: Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perfect 10 Inc
Represented By: Daniel J Cooper, Russell J Frackman, Jeffrey D Goldman, Jeffrey N Mausner
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google Inc
Represented By: Michael S Brophy, Andrew P Bridges, Jennifer A Golinveaux, Andrew P Bridges, Jennifer A Golinveaux
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter Claimant: Google Inc
Represented By: Michael S Brophy, Andrew P Bridges, Jennifer A Golinveaux, Andrew P Bridges, Jennifer A Golinveaux
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter Defendant: Perfect 10 Inc
Represented By: Daniel J Cooper, Russell J Frackman, Jeffrey D Goldman, Jeffrey N Mausner
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]