Date Filed
|
#
|
Docket Text
|
| June 14, 2007 |
1
|
COMPLAINT against Defendants Forever 21 Inc, Forever 21 Retail Inc, Does 1 to 10. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Harajuku Lovers LLC. (et) (Entered: June 19, 2007)
|
| June 14, 2007 |
|
20 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) [1] as to Forever 21 Inc, Forever 21 Retail Inc, Does 1 to 10. (et) (Entered: June 19, 2007)
|
| June 14, 2007 |
2
|
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Harajuku Lovers LLC. (et) (Entered: June 19, 2007)
|
| June 14, 2007 |
|
FAX number for Attorney Barry E Mallen, Jill M Pietrini, Joy T Teitel is 310-312-4224. (et) (Entered: June 19, 2007)
|
| June 15, 2007 |
3
|
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Otis D. Wright II: This case has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Otis D. Right II. All counsel are
ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly F.R.Civ.P. 16, 26, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, this Court's Order for
Jury Trial, and this Court's Order for Court Trial. See document for details. (gk) (Entered: June 19, 2007)
|
| July 24, 2007 |
4
|
JOINT STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint; Defendants Forever 21, Inc. answer or response now due 8/12/2007; Forever 21 Retail, Inc. answer or
response now due 8/12/2007. (gk) (Entered: July 26, 2007)
|
| August 3, 2007 |
5
|
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL by Judge Otis D. Wright II: Scheduling Conference set for 9/24/2007 02:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel shall meet at least 21 days in advance of
the Scheduling Conference to prepare a jointly signed report for the court to be submitted no less than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. See document for details. (gk) (Entered:
08/06/2007)
|
| August 3, 2007 |
6
|
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harajuku Lovers, LLC upon Defendant Forever 21 Retail, Inc. served on 7/10/2007, answer due 8/12/2007. The Summons and Complaint were served by
personal service, statute under which service was made is not indicated, upon Dena Laporte, authorized agent for Forever 21 Retail, Inc., a California corporation. Due Dilligence
declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (gk) Modified on 8/7/2007 (gk, ). (Entered: August 7, 2007)
|
| August 3, 2007 |
7
|
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harajuku Lovers, LLC upon Defendant Forever 21, Inc. served on 7/10/2007, answer due 8/12/2007. The Summons and Complaint were served by personal
service, statute under which service was made is not indicated, upon Dena Laporte, authorized agent for Forever 21 Inc., a Delaware corporation. Due Dilligence declaration not attached.
Original Summons not returned. (gk) (Entered: August 7, 2007)
|
| August 10, 2007 |
8
|
ANSWER to Complaint [1] and COUNTERCLAIM against Harajuku Lovers, LLC filed by Defendants Forever 21, Inc. and Forever 21 Retail, Inc.(gk) (Entered: August 15, 2007)
|
| August 10, 2007 |
9
|
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Forever 21, Inc. and Forever 21 Retail, Inc. (gk) (Entered: August 15, 2007)
|
| September 4, 2007 |
10
|
STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright II: It is stipulated and agreed to extend by six days the time within which Plaintiff is required to file its reply, or otherwise respond, to
the Counterclaim, [8] filed by Forever 21. Accordingly, the last day for Plaintiff to file a responsive pleading to Forever 21's counterclaim shall be exrtended from September 4, 2007 to
September 10, 2007.(ca) (Entered: September 5, 2007)
|
| September 11, 2007 |
11
|
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Harajuku Lovers LLC, Defendants Forever 21 Inc, Forever 21 Retail Inc. (lc) (Entered:
09/12/2007)
|
| September 11, 2007 |
12
|
ANSWER to Counterclaim[8]; Jury Demand filed by counter defendant Harajuku Lovers LLC.(lc) (Entered: September 12, 2007)
|
| September 19, 2007 |
13
|
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Otis D Wright II: Court is in receipt of parties Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Court has reviewed the report and deems a scheduling conference
unnecessary. According the 9/24/07 2:30 PM scheduling conference is vacated and no appearance is necessary. A scheduling and case management order will issue.(lc) (Entered: September 20, 2007)
|
| September 19, 2007 |
14
|
ORDER FOR CIVIL TRIAL: Instructions and applicable rules by Judge Otis D Wright II (lc) Modified on 9/24/2007 (lc, ). (Entered: September 24, 2007)
|
| September 19, 2007 |
15
|
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright II: Jury trial: 10/28/08 9:00 AM; File final trial exhibit stipulation: 10/23/08; hearing on motions in limine and Hearing on
disputed jury instructions: 10/20/08 4:00 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 9/29/08 3:30 PM; motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions and proposed voir dire questions and agreed to
statement of case: 9/29/08; lodged Pretrial conference order and retrial exhibit stipulation, file contentions of fact and law, exhibit and witness lists, status report regarding
settlement, agreed upon set of instructions and verdict forms, joint statement regarding disputed instructions verdicts etc: 9/15/08; last date to conduct settlement conference 9/1/08; last
day for hearing motions: 9/8/08; discovery cutoff: 8/11/08; last date to amend pleadings or add parties: 12/17/07.(lc) (Entered: September 24, 2007)
|
