|
Date Filed
|
#
|
Docket Text
|
| January 12, 2009 |
1
|
COMPLAINT against defendant Starbucks Corporation by plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 1/12/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: January 9, 2009)
|
| January 12, 2009 |
2
|
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi (Haro, Summer) Modified on 1/12/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: January 9, 2009)
|
| January 12, 2009 |
|
RECEIPT number # CAE200013460 $350.00 fbo plaintiffs Rakesh and Pranika Joshi by Goodman and Associates on 1/12/2009. (Marciel, M) (Entered: January 12, 2009)
|
| January 12, 2009 |
4
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Starbucks Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *20* days. Attorney *Karen M. Goodman* *Goodman & Associates* *3840 Watt Avenue, Building A*
*Sacramento, CA 95821-2640*. (Marciel, M) (Entered: January 12, 2009)
|
| January 12, 2009 |
5
|
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: # 1 Consent Forms, # 2 VDRP Forms) (Marciel, M) (Entered: January 12, 2009)
|
| January 27, 2009 |
6
|
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Starbucks Corporation served on 1/21/2009, answer due 2/10/2009. (Haro, Summer) (Entered: January 27, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
7
|
MEMORANDUM in SUPPORT OF 9 Motion for Order of Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi.
(Haro, Summer) Modified on 1/30/2009 (Krueger, M). (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
8
|
MOTION for right to attach Order and Writ of Attachment by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr..
(Haro, Summer) Modified on 3/6/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
9
|
[DUPLICATIVE OF DOCUMENT 7 ] MEMORANDUM in SUPPORT of 8 Motion
for Order of Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 1/30/2009 (Krueger, M). (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
10
|
REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi in re 8 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to RJN)(Haro, Summer) (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
11
|
DECLARATION of Rakesh Joshi in Support of 8 MOTION For Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Haro, Summer) (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
12
|
DECLARATION of Pranika Joshi in Support of 8 MOTION For Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Haro, Summer) (Entered:
01/30/2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
13
|
DECLARATION of Summer D. Haro in Support of 8 MOTION For Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Haro, Summer)
(Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
14
|
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 10 Request for Judicial Notice, 13 , 8 MOTION For Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment, 12 , 11 , 9
Memorandum in Support of Motion. (Haro, Summer) (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| January 30, 2009 |
15
|
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 10 Request for Judicial Notice, 13 , 8 MOTION For Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment, 12 , 11 , 9
Memorandum in Support of Motion. (Haro, Summer) (Entered: January 30, 2009)
|
| February 9, 2009 |
16
|
ANSWER to COMPLAINT by Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Wilson, Jason Haruo added.(Wilson, Jason) (Entered: February 9, 2009)
|
| February 20, 2009 |
17
|
OPPOSITION Against Issuance of Right to Attach Order by Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Ahern, Eileen M. added. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Douglas Stevens, # 2 Affidavit of Jeremy Hudson, #
3 Objections to Documents)(Ahern, Eileen) Modified on 2/23/2009 (Duong, D). (Entered: February 20, 2009)
|
| February 24, 2009 |
18
|
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Starbucks Corporation re 17 Opposition . (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: February 24, 2009)
|
| February 27, 2009 |
19
|
REPLY by plaintiffs in support of 8 Motion for right to attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Haro, Summer) Modified on
3/6/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: February 27, 2009)
|
| February 27, 2009 |
20
|
DECLARATION of Rakesh Joshi in support of 8 Motion for right to attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D # 2 Exhibit E) (Haro, Summer) Modified on 3/6/2009 (Marciel,
M). (Entered: February 27, 2009)
|
| February 27, 2009 |
21
|
DECLARATION of Timothy D. Ferris in support of 8 Motion for right to attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Attachments: #
1 Exhibit F # 2 Exhibit G) (Haro, Summer) Modified on 3/6/2009
(Marciel, M). (Entered: February 27, 2009)
|
| February 27, 2009 |
22
|
DECLARATION of Summer D. Haro in support of 8 Motion for right to attach Order and Writ of Attachment. (Haro, Summer) Modified
on 3/6/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: February 27, 2009)
|
| February 27, 2009 |
23
|
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE for 19 Reply to Response to Motion and 20
21 22 Declarations by plaintiffs. (Haro, Summer) Modified on
3/6/2009 (Marciel, M). (Entered: February 27, 2009)
|
| March 3, 2009 |
24
|
MINUTE ORDER by CRD M. Krueger for Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 3/3/2009: Plaintiffs' Motion for Order of Right to Attach and Writ of Attachment 8 is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. The hearing set for 3/6/2009 is VACATED. The Court will issue a written order. (TEXT
ONLY) (Krueger, M) (Entered: March 3, 2009)
|
| March 3, 2009 |
25
|
SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS by defendant Starbucks Corporation to 20 21 22 Declarations. (Ahern, Eileen) Modified on 3/6/2009 (Marciel, M).
(Entered: March 3, 2009)
|
| March 20, 2009 |
26
|
JOINT STATUS REPORT by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) (Entered: March 20, 2009)
|
| March 20, 2009 |
27
|
CONSENT to VDRP by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi.(Haro, Summer) (Entered: March 20, 2009)
|
| March 23, 2009 |
28
|
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/20/09: This Case Referred to the Court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program, to be completed by May 31, 2009, and that
the Court's VDRP Administrator provide the parties with a list of three (3) potential Neutrals from the Court's Panel of Neutrals. (Kaminski, H) (Entered: March 23, 2009)
|
| March 23, 2009 |
29
|
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 3/23/09 DENYING Pltfs' 8 motion for order of right to attach and writ of
attachment. (Engbretson, K.) (Entered: March 23, 2009)
|
| March 24, 2009 |
30
|
MINUTE ORDER by CRD M. Krueger for Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/24/2009: The Court has reviewed the Joint Status Report filed on March 20, 2009 26 , and the report does not fully comply with the Courts Order of January 12, 2009. Specifically, the status report does provide
proposed dates for discovery cut-off, for the final pretrial conference, and for trial. Accordingly, the parties shall file a new Joint Status Report with specific proposed dates on or
before April 13, 2009. (TEXT ONLY). (Krueger, M) (Entered: March 24, 2009)
|
| April 7, 2009 |
31
|
[TEXT ONLY ENTRY] COURT LETTER from VDRP Administrator appointing Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Jr., of Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud, as Neutral Attorney.(Martinez, L) (Entered: April 7, 2009)
|
| April 8, 2009 |
32
|
SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT STATUS REPORT by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 4/9/2009 (Streeter, J). (Entered: April 8, 2009)
|
| April 9, 2009 |
33
|
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 04/09/09: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/2/2010. Discovery due by 2/16/2010. Dispositive Motion due by
7/9/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/17/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Jury Trial set for 11/30/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD)
before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Streeter, J) (Entered: April 9, 2009)
|
| May 1, 2009 |
34
|
[DISREGARD- SEE document 35 for correct image] STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Deadline to Complete VDRP re
28 Stipulation and Order,, Case Referred to VDRP - O, by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 5/4/2009
(Donati, J). (Entered: May 1, 2009)
|
| May 1, 2009 |
35
|
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Deadline to Complete VDRP re 28 Stipulation and Order. (Haro, Summer) Modified
on 5/4/2009 (Donati, J). (Entered: May 1, 2009)
|
| May 4, 2009 |
36
|
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 5/1/2009 ORDERING 35 The deadline for the parties to complete
the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP) session is continued to 7/31/2009. (Reader, L) (Entered: May 4, 2009)
|
| June 24, 2009 |
37
|
MOTION to QUASH Subpoena to Scott Valley Bank and for Sanctions Against Defendant Starbucks Corporation by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2009 at 10:00 AM
in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: # 1 Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration by Summer D. Haro, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)(Haro, Summer) (Entered: June 24, 2009)
|
| June 24, 2009 |
38
|
MOTION to QUASH Subpoena to California Appraisals and for Sanctions Against Defendant Starbucks by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2009 at 10:00 AM in
Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: # 1 Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration Summer D. Haro, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)(Haro, Summer) (Entered: June 24, 2009)
|
| June 30, 2009 |
|
[TEXT ONLY ENTRY] COMPLETION of VDRP, terminating VDRP party. This case has completed the VDRP process. Case did not settle.(Martinez, L) (Entered: June 30, 2009)
|
| July 17, 2009 |
39
|
OPPOSITION by Starbucks Corporation to 37 MOTION to QUASH Subpoena to Scott Valley Bank and for Sanctions Against Defendant
Starbucks Corporation. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: July 17, 2009)
|
| July 17, 2009 |
40
|
OPPOSITION by Starbucks Corporation to 38 MOTION to QUASH Subpoena to California Appraisals and for Sanctions Against
Defendant Starbucks. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: July 17, 2009)
|
| July 17, 2009 |
41
|
DECLARATION of Eileen M. Ahern in Support of 39 Opposition and 40
Opposition.(Ahern, Eileen) Modified on 7/20/2009 (Streeter, J). (Entered: July 17, 2009)
|
| July 20, 2009 |
42
|
NOTICE of Errata by Starbucks Corporation re 39 Opposition to Motion. (Ahern, Eileen) Modified on 7/21/2009 (Streeter, J).
(Entered: July 20, 2009)
|
| July 20, 2009 |
43
|
NOTICE of Errata by Starbucks Corporation re 40 Opposition to Motion. (Ahern, Eileen) Modified on 7/21/2009 (Streeter, J).
(Entered: July 20, 2009)
|
| July 24, 2009 |
44
|
REPLY to 40 opposition to motion to quash by Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 7/27/2009 (Gaydosh,
J). (Entered: July 24, 2009)
|
| July 24, 2009 |
45
|
REPLY to 39 opposition to motion to quash by Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi. (Haro, Summer) Modified on 7/27/2009 (Gaydosh,
J). (Entered: July 24, 2009)
|
| July 24, 2009 |
46
|
OBJECTION to 41 declaration of Eileen Ahern in opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to quash by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi.
(Haro, Summer) Modified on 7/27/2009 (Gaydosh, J). (Entered: July 24, 2009)
|
| July 29, 2009 |
47
|
JOINT STATEMENT re: disagreement over Plaintiffs' 38 MOTIONS to QUASH, 37 . (Haro, Summer) Modified on 7/30/2009 (Mena-Sanchez, L). (Entered: July 29, 2009)
|
| July 31, 2009 |
48
|
MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd: MOTION HEARING held on 7/31/2009 re 38 MOTION
to QUASH Subpoena to California Appraisals and for Sanctions Against Defendant Starbucks filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi, 37 MOTION to QUASH Subpoena to Scott Valley Bank and for Sanctions Against Defendant Starbucks Corporation filed by Rakesh
Joshi, Pranika Joshi. With these limitations as stated on the record, the court denies the Motions to Quash and the Motions for Sanctions. With respect to the California Appraisal
documents the subpoena must be limited to the partial that is the subject of the development in question about which plaintiff seeks damages in their complaint. With that limitation and
with all documents obtained by subpoena being in subject to a stipulated protective order prepared by the parties and to be signed by the court that is for use for purposes of this
litigation only and not disclosed to other parties. That motion to quash is denied. With respect to the subpoena to Scotts Valley Bank, the subpoena is limited to the application to the
extent that it makes representations regarding leases that have been executed in connection with the development. Documents, notes, statements in Scotts Valley Banking in connection to
this application that reflect representations of the plaintiffs regarding the leasing of the space and any documents, notations information contained in the Bank's file indicating their
own determination of whether those representations were accurate. With that Subpoena the documents produced pursuant to that Subpoena to be also the subject of the same protective order.
The motion for Sanctions are denied. The court will issue a brief summary order that states for the reasons set forth on the record that the hearing for Motions to Quash and for Sanctions
are denied as with the subpoenas approved as limited on the record. Plaintiffs Counsel Summer Haro present. Defendants Counsel Eileen Ahern present. Court Reporter/CD Number: 1 of 1.
(Callen, V) (Entered: July 31, 2009)
|
| August 12, 2009 |
49
|
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Substitution of Counsel by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Attorney Buche, John Karl added. (Buche, John) (Entered: August 12, 2009)
|
| August 12, 2009 |
50
|
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi for attorney Damian E. LaCroix to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Buche, John) (Entered: August 12, 2009)
|
| August 12, 2009 |
|
RECEIPT number CAE200019152 in the amount of $180 for Pro Hac Vice for Damian E. LaCroix from John K. Buche. (Duong, D) (Entered: August 12, 2009)
|
| August 13, 2009 |
52
|
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/12/09: Added attorney Damian E. LaCroix, PHV for Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi. (Engbretson, K.) (Entered: August 13, 2009)
|
| August 13, 2009 |
53
|
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 08/12/09. Attorneys John Karl Buche and Damian E. LaCroix (pro hac vice) are SUBSTITUTED in as counsel in place and
stead of Karen M. Goodman and Summer Dawn Haro for plfs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi. (Benson, A.) (Entered: August 13, 2009)
|
| August 27, 2009 |
54
|
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Protective Order by Starbucks Corporation. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: August 27, 2009)
|
| August 28, 2009 |
55
|
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/27/09. (Mena-Sanchez, L) (Entered: August 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
56
|
NOTICE OF MOTION for Partial Summary Adjudication by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi: (LaCroix, Damian) Modified on 9/28/2009 (Krueger, M). (Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
57
|
NOTICE OF FILING DOCUMENT by plts. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of plt Rakesh Joshis , # 2 Exhibit 1-A, # 3 Exhibit 1-B, # 4 Exhibit 1-C, # 5 Declaration of Timothy Ferris # 6 Exhibit 2-A)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
58
|
MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Motion Hearing set for 11/13/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (LaCroix, Damian) .
(Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
59
|
SEPARATE STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiffs' 58 MOTION for Partial Sumary Adjudication. (LaCroix, Damian)
(Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
60
|
MEMORANDUM by plts in SUPPORT of 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Plaintiff Rakesh Joshi # 2 Exhibit 1-A, # 3 Exhibit 1-B, # 4 Exhibit 1-C, # 5 Declaration of Timothy Ferris , # 6 Exhibit 2-A)(LaCroix, Damian)
(Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
61
|
MINUTE ORDER by CRD M. Krueger for Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/28/2009: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Adjudication 58 is
improperly noticed. Only those motions in matters specified in Local Rule 72-302 and 72-303 shall be noticed before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact the
Clerk for the District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. for available law and motion dates and file an Amended Notice of Motion. (TEXT ONLY) (Krueger, M) (Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
62
|
AMENDED NOTICE of Plaintiffs' 55 Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication Filed. Hearing set for 11/13/09 10:00am before
Honorable Frank c. Damrell. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 28, 2009 |
63
|
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 62 Amended Notice of Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication .
(LaCroix, Damian) Modified on 9/29/2009 (Duong, D). (Entered: September 28, 2009)
|
| September 29, 2009 |
64
|
NOTICE of HEARING on MOTION: Plaintiff's MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 is SET for 11/13/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD)
before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (TEXT ONLY) (Krueger, M) (Entered: September 29, 2009)
|
| October 30, 2009 |
65
|
OPPOSITION by Starbucks Corporation to 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: October 30, 2009)
|
| October 30, 2009 |
66
|
AFFIDAVIT re 65 Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication by Starbucks Corporation. (Ahern, Eileen)
(Entered: October 30, 2009)
|
| October 30, 2009 |
67
|
OBJECTIONS by Defendant Starbucks Corporation to 60 Memorandum in Support of Motion,. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: October 30, 2009)
|
| October 30, 2009 |
68
|
STATEMENT of Disputed and Undisputed Facts by Defendant Starbucks Corporation re 65 Opposition to Motion. (Ahern, Eileen)
(Entered: October 30, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
69
|
REPLY by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 65 Opposition to Motion. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
70
|
EXHIBIT 1 re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
71
|
REPLY by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 67 Objections. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
72
|
EXHIBIT 1 re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 1, # 5 Exhibit 1)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
73
|
EXHIBIT 1 re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 1)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
74
|
EXHIBIT re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-A, # 2 Exhibit 2-B)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
75
|
EXHIBIT 2-C re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-C, # 2 Exhibit 2-C, # 3 Exhibit 2-C)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
76
|
EXHIBIT 2-C re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
77
|
EXHIBIT 2-C re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
78
|
EXHIBIT 2-D re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit 2-D)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
79
|
EXHIBIT 2-D re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-D)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
80
|
EXHIBIT 2-F re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
81
|
EXHIBIT 2-F re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
82
|
EXHIBIT 2-G re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
83
|
EXHIBIT 2-G re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-G, # 2 Exhibit 2-G)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
84
|
EXHIBIT 2-H re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-H, # 2 Exhibit 2-H)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
85
|
EXHIBIT 2-H re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-H, # 2 Exhibit 2-H)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
86
|
EXHIBIT 2-H re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-H, # 2 Exhibit 2-H)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
87
|
EXHIBIT 2-I re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
88
|
EXHIBIT 2-J re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
89
|
EXHIBIT 3 re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/06/2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
90
|
EXHIBIT 3-A re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3-A, # 2 Exhibit 3-A)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
91
|
EXHIBIT 3-A re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3-A)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 6, 2009 |
92
|
EXHIBIT 3-B re 58 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3-B)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 6, 2009)
|
| November 9, 2009 |
93
|
NOTICE of Errata by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 69 Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-C pages 21-26, # 2 Exhibit 2-D page 2, # 3 Exhibit 2-E)(LaCroix, Damian) (Entered: November 9, 2009)
|
| November 10, 2009 |
94
|
MINUTE ORDER by CRD M. Krueger for Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/10/2009: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 58 is
hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. The hearing set for November 13, 2009 is VACATED. The Court will issue a written order. (TEXT ONLY) (Krueger, M) (Entered: November 10, 2009)
|
| November 13, 2009 |
95
|
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/13/2009 ORDERING plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication 58 GRANTED. (Krueger, M) (Entered: November 13, 2009)
|
| November 17, 2009 |
96
|
MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. Motion Hearing set for 2/12/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.. (LaCroix, Damian)
(Entered: November 17, 2009)
|
| November 17, 2009 |
97
|
MEMORANDUM by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi in SUPPORT of 96 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/17/2009)
|
| November 17, 2009 |
98
|
STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts by Plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi re 96 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (LaCroix, Damian)
(Entered: November 17, 2009)
|
| November 17, 2009 |
99
|
NOTICE OF FILING / LODGING DOCUMENT IN PAPER by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi: Notice of Lodgement of Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication Lodged. (LaCroix, Damian)
(Entered: November 17, 2009)
|
| November 17, 2009 |
100
|
NOTICE OF FILING / LODGING DOCUMENT IN PAPER by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi: Notice of Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication Filed. (LaCroix, Damian) (Entered:
11/17/2009)
|
| December 7, 2009 |
101
|
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/4/09 DENYING Pltfs' 37 and 38 Motions to Quash. (Engbretson, K.) (Entered: December 7, 2009)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
102
|
MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Starbucks Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 2/12/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered:
01/06/2010)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
103
|
STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts by Defendant Starbucks Corporation re 102 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered:
01/06/2010)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
104
|
DECLARATION of Eileen Ahern in Support of 102 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: January 6, 2010)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
105
|
DECLARATION of Michael Malanga in Support of 102 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: January 6, 2010)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
106
|
DECLARATION of Douglas Stevens in Support of 102 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: January 6, 2010)
|
| January 6, 2010 |
107
|
DECLARATION of Nathan Weinberger in Support of 102 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Ahern, Eileen) (Entered: January 6, 2010)
|
| January 12, 2010 |
108
|
NOTICE of ACCEPTANCE with OFFER of JUDGMENT by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Buche, John) (Entered: January 12, 2010)
|
| January 12, 2010 |
109
|
JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Offer of Judgment and Notice of Acceptance of Offer by Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on January 12, 2010. CASE CLOSED. (Krueger, M)
(Entered: January 12, 2010)
|
| January 26, 2010 |
110
|
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES by Starbucks Corporation. (Ahern, Eileen) Modified on
1/27/2010 (Duong, D). (Entered: January 26, 2010)
|
| January 27, 2010 |
111
|
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/26/2010 re 110 ORDERING that the time for Plaintiffs to file a
motion for attorneys' fees and related nontaxable expenses shall be EXTENDED up to and including February 9, 2010.(Duong, D) (Entered: January 27, 2010)
|
| February 8, 2010 |
112
|
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Further Extending Plaintiff's Time to File Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs by Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi. (Buche, John) (Entered: February 8, 2010)
|
