Date Filed
|
#
|
Docket Text
|
| February 2, 2007 |
1
|
MOTION to Compel Fish & Richardson P.C. to Comply w/ Subpoena Duces Tecum by defendants eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 eBay's Memorandum in Support # 2 Declaration of David Peyman# 3 Proof of Service)(jah) (Entered: February 6, 2007)
|
| February 2, 2007 |
2
|
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by defendants eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc. (jah) (Entered: February 6, 2007)
|
| February 2, 2007 |
3
|
MOTION for Order to Shorten Time for Briefing and a Hearing by defendants eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support # 2 Declaration of David Peyman # 3 Proof of Service)(jah) (Entered: February 6, 2007)
|
| February 6, 2007 |
4
|
ORDER granting Dfts' 3 Motion to Shorten Time for Breifing and a Hearing.
Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 2/6/2007. Any opposition to Dfts' motion to compel Fish & Richardson to comply w/ subpoena duces tecum shall be filed by 2/9/2007. Any
reply shall be filed by 2/13/2007. Motion scheduled for 2/15/2007 at 2:00pm. No oral argument shall be heard. Motion shall be decided on the papers(jah) (Entered: February 7, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
5
|
RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION to Compel Fish & Richardson to
Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Fish & Richardson P.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer Schmied in Support Thereof# 2 Declaration of John Steele in Support Thereof# 3 Request for Judicial Notice # 4 Exhibit A to Request for Judicial Notice# 5 Exhibit B to Request for Judicial Notice)(Schmied, Jennifer). Modified on
2/12/2007 - Party and Atty added to case. Atty Maint (jah). (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
6
|
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Fish & Richardson P.C. (Schmied, Jennifer) (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
7
|
BRIEF in Support of MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C. by Mercexchange, L.L.C.. (Mortimer, Ann Marie). Modified on 2/12/2007 - Incorrect Event used.
Not a motion, should be filed as attachment to motion. Motion filed as document No. 8 (jah). (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
8
|
NOTICE by Mercexchange, L.L.C. re 7 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces
Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C. (Mortimer, Ann Marie). Modified on 2/12/2007 - Incorrect Event, should have filed as Motion.(jah). (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
9
|
PROPOSED ORDER Granting Plaintiff MercExchange, LLC's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C. and Denying Defendants' Motion to Compel by Mercexchange, L.L.C..
(Mortimer, Ann Marie). Modified on 2/12/2007 - Incorrect Event used, not a Motion. Proposed Orders are not to be filed per ECF Policies and Procedures. Corrected text. Motion termed. Atty
contacted (jah). (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
10
|
RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION to Compel Fish & Richardson P.C.
To Comply With A Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Mercexchange, L.L.C.. (Mortimer, Ann Marie) (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
11
|
DECLARATION Of Ann Marie Mortimer In Support of Plaintiff MercExchange, L.L.C.'s Brief In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish &
Richardson P.C. by Plaintiff Mercexchange, L.L.C.. (Mortimer, Ann Marie) (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 9, 2007 |
12
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mercexchange, L.L.C. re 1) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Fish & Richardson P.C. To Comply with a Subpoena Duces Tecum; 2)
Declaration of Ann Marie Mortimer In Support of Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C. [With
Exhibits 1-5]; 3) Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson, P.C.; 4) Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena Duces
Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C.; 5) Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon Fish & Richardson P.C. and Denying Defendants' Motion to
Compel (Mortimer, Ann Marie). Modified on 2/12/2007 - Document contains electronic signature of non-registered user. Only registered Attys may submit electronic signatures, not staff
members (jah). (Entered: February 9, 2007)
|
| February 13, 2007 |
13
|
REPLY re 5 Response in Opposition to Motion, in Support of its Motion
to Compel Fish & Richardson to Comply with Subpoena Duces Teucm filed by eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc.. (Randall, Jeffrey). Modified on 2/14/2007 Missing Proof of Service. Atty
contacted (jah). (Entered: February 13, 2007)
|
| February 13, 2007 |
14
|
DECLARATION of Jeffrey Randall Supporting Defendants' Reply Brief by Defendants eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to Randall Dec# 2 Exhibit 2 to Randall Dec# 3 Exhibit 3 to Randall Dec# 4 Exhibit 4 to Randall Dec# 5 Exhibit 5 to Randall Dec# 6 Exhibit 6 to Randall Dec# 7 Exhibit 7 to Randall Dec# 8 Exhibit 8 to Randlal Dec)(Randall, Jeffrey). Modified on 2/14/2007 - Missing
Proof of Service. Atty contacted (jah). (Entered: February 13, 2007)
|
| February 13, 2007 |
15
|
RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Upon
Fish & Richardson P.C. filed by eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc.. (Randall, Jeffrey). Modified on 2/14/2007 - Missing Proof of Service. Atty contacted (jah). (Entered: February 13, 2007)
|
| February 14, 2007 |
16
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by eBay Inc., Half.com, Inc. re 14 Declaration,,
13 Reply,, 15 Response in Opposition to Motion (Randall, Jeffrey) (Entered: February 14, 2007)
|
| February 16, 2007 |
17
|
ORDER denying without prejudice 1 Defendants Ebay Inc.'s and Half.com's
Motion to Compel Fish & Richardson P.C. to comply with a subpoena duces tecum and, denying without prejudice 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash subpoena duces tecum upon Fish & Richardson.
Signed by Judge Louisa S Porter on 02/16/07. (jpp, ) (Entered: February 16, 2007)
|
| February 20, 2007 |
18
|
PRO HAC VICE APPOINTED: Gregory N Stillman appearing for Plaintiff Mercexchange, L.L.C. (jah) (Entered: February 20, 2007)
|
| February 21, 2007 |
19
|
CLERK'S JUDGMENT; Defendant's motion to compel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to quash subpoena duces tecum is denied without prejudice . (jpp, ) (Entered: February 21, 2007)
|
