Walsh v. Apple, Inc. et al Featured Case

Plaintiff David Walsh alleged that Defendant Apple Inc. consistently and uniformly denied its network engineers the required regular, overtime, and other compensation that federal and state laws require.

Plaintiff: David Walsh
Defendant: Apple, Inc. and DOES
Case Number: 3:2008cv01410
Filed: August 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey T. Miller
Presiding Judge: Louisa S Porter
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2008 Filing 12
Case transferred to District of USDC, Northern District of CA, San Jose Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of USDC, Northern District of CA, San Jose Division*.*280 South First Street**San Jose, CA 95113*. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 10/24/08. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/27/2008: # 1 Order) (tkl).
October 22, 2008 Filing 11
Joint MOTION for Change Venue and to Permit Plaintiff to file Second Amended Complaint by David Walsh. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Nordrehaug, Kyle) (tkl).
September 25, 2008 Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple, Inc. re 7 MOTION for Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) MOTION for Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) Corrected (Perry, Jessica)
September 23, 2008 Filing 7
MOTION for Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities MPA 1-9, # 2 Declaration of Heather Ramirez (DEC 1-3))(Perry, Jessica). Modified on 9/25/2008 (tkl). Emailed atty re S/ on proof of service.
September 9, 2008 Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all defendants, filed by David Walsh. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Blumenthal, Norman)
August 27, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4
ORDER granting 3 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Time extended for Dft Apple, Inc. to answer to Complaint, Answer due 9/11/2008. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/27/2008. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah)
August 26, 2008 Filing 3
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by Apple, Inc.. (Perry, Jessica) (jpp). Modified on 8/27/2008 - Corrected motion event (jah).
August 4, 2008 Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc., DOES. (jmz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walsh v. Apple, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Walsh
Represented By: Norman B. Blumenthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?