Phenomenon Licensing v. MySpace Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Phenomenon Licensing
Defendant: MySpace Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00691
Filed: March 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Trademark Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Memorandum of Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to remand and denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion not to consolidate as there is no other case with which this case can be condolidated (Related Doc # 6 ).Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 6/6/2008.(B,B)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phenomenon Licensing v. MySpace Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phenomenon Licensing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MySpace Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?