Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2009cv00047
Filed: March 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Patent Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:145 Patent Infringement
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Northern District of California of receiving case transferred on 9/24/09 and assigned case number 4:09cv4436. (ljw, )
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 9 Motion to Change Venue. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 8/25/09. (ljw, )
August 10, 2009 Filing 29 RESPONSE to Motion re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California Response to Order Dated July 31, 2009 filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Gaudet, Matthew)
August 10, 2009 Filing 28 BRIEF filed Regarding Transferring Venue To The Western District of Texas by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Glasser, Darin)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER that the parties should submit any papers they wish the court to consider on the issue of whether transferring venue to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas is appropriate under Section 1404(a) on or before August 10, 2009. These submissions will be limited to ten pages, excluding attachments. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/31/09. (ljw, )
July 24, 2009 Filing 26 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Yagura, Ryan)
July 7, 2009 Filing 25 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Gaudet, Matthew)
July 2, 2009 Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Reply Declaration of Joni B. Reicher)(Glasser, Darin)
July 1, 2009 Filing 23 APPROVED APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Brian McQuillen for Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 receipt)(ljw, )
June 29, 2009 Filing 22 RESPONSE to 12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Hansen, Stephanie)
June 22, 2009 Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California Declaration of Matthew C. Gaudet filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N)(Jameson, Louis)
June 22, 2009 Filing 20 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California Declaration of Russell W. White filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Jameson, Louis)
June 22, 2009 Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jameson, Louis)
June 22, 2009 Filing 18 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Stephanie Hansen for Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (receipt 9-1-1099) (djh, )
June 22, 2009 Filing 17 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Matthew Christopher Gaudet for Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (receipt 9-1-1099) (djh, )
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 6/17/09. (djh, )
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Governing Proceedings and setting Rule 16 Management Conference on 9/23/09 at 10:00 am in Beaumont, Tx. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 6/17/9. (djh, )
June 18, 2009 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Louis Norwood Jameson on behalf of Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (Jameson, Louis)
June 5, 2009 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Apple, Inc. (Glasser, Darin)
June 5, 2009 Filing 12 Apple Inc.'s ANSWER to 1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC by Apple, Inc..(Glasser, Darin)
June 5, 2009 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California Declaration of Joni B. Reicher filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, # 2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12, # 4 Exhibit 13, # 5 Exhibit 14)(Glasser, Darin)
June 5, 2009 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California Declaration of Darin J. Glasser filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(Glasser, Darin)
June 5, 2009 Filing 9 MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Glasser, Darin)
May 29, 2009 Filing 8 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney George A Riley for Apple, Inc. (Receipt 9-1-1090 $25) (djh, )
May 27, 2009 Filing 7 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Nicholas J Whilt for Apple, Inc. (Receipt 9-1-1088) (djh, )
May 27, 2009 Filing 6 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Ryan K Yagura for Apple, Inc. (Receipt 9-1-1088 $25) (djh, )
May 27, 2009 Filing 5 (APPROVED) APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Darin J. Glasser for Apple, Inc. (receipt 9-1-1088 $25) (djh, )
April 20, 2009 Opinion or Order ORAL ORDER granting 4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer is extended to June 5, 2009. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on April 20, 2009. (vjw, )
April 14, 2009 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, (DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS DEADLINE TO MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT) by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Danny)
March 25, 2009 Filing 3 E-GOV SEALED SUMMONS Issued as to Apple, Inc.. (ljw, )
March 24, 2009 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Sankey, Thomas)
March 24, 2009 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 05400000000001929615.), filed by Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B to Complaint, # 3 Exhibit C to Complaint, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Summons(es))(Sankey, Thomas)
March 24, 2009 Case assigned to Judge Ron Clark. (ljw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC
Represented By: Thomas W Sankey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?