| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| Yoder, et al v. Town of Morristown, et al | January 6, 2009 | October 23, 2009 |
| Public Citizen, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board et al | September 23, 2008 | October 15, 2009 |
| Plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of amendments to the lawyer advertising provisions of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct and alleged that the bar to a wide range of common advertising practices, such as the use of testimonials, actors, reenactments and dramatizations, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. |
| Faith Center Church Evengelist Ministries et al v. Glover et al | July 30, 2004 | October 8, 2009 |
| First Amendment claim by religious group who claims that a public library is not allowing it to hold services in the meeting room. |
| Kings English, The et al v. Shurtleff et al | June 9, 2005 | October 1, 2009 |
| Utah bookstores, artistic and informative websites, Internet service providers and national trade associations challenged of state law restricting children's access to material on the Internet. |
| Ostergren v. McDonnell | June 11, 2008 | July 16, 2009 |
| Plaintiff Betty J. Ostergren challenged a Virginia statute that prohibited individuals from disseminating public records containing Social Security Numbers. |
| NEWDOW et al v. ROBERTS et al | December 30, 2008 | April 13, 2009 |
| J.S. et al v. Blue Mountain School District et al | March 28, 2007 | October 15, 2008 |
| Plaintiff J.S., a minor, sued Defendants Blue Mountain School District, Superintendent Joyce E. Romberger and Principal James S. McGonigle. Plaintiff alleged that the school's discipline for creating a false internet profile purporting to be her school principal violated her civil rights. |
| Scherfen et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al | August 19, 2008 | August 19, 2008 |
| Plaintiffs Erich Scherfen and Rubina Tareen alleged that Defendants' failed to provide any procedural due process to allow Plaintiffs to contest their continued designation on terrorist watch lists. Plaintiffs also alleged that Defendants selected and maintained Plaintiffs on the watch lists because of their Muslim faith and attendant religious activities. |
| Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. et al v. Wikileaks et al | February 6, 2008 | March 5, 2008 |
| Plaintiffs Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. and Julius Baer Bank and Trust Co. Ltd. alleged that Defendants Wikileaks, wikileaks.org and Dynadot LLC unlawfully and wrongfully published confidential bank documents belonging to the Plaintiffs on the Wikileaks.org website. |
| Video Software Dealers Association et al v. Schwarzenegger et al | October 17, 2005 | October 18, 2007 |
| Plaintiffs Video Software Dealers Association and Entertainment Software Association sought declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of a California statute that penalizes the sale or rental of "violent" video games to persons under the age of 18. |
| Entertainment Software Association et al v. Foti et al | June 16, 2006 | August 6, 2007 |
| Plaintiffs Entertainment Software Association and Entertainment Merchants Association sought declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of a new Louisiana statute that criminalizes the sale or rental of violent video games to persons under 18. |
| Requa v. Kent School District No 415 et al | May 17, 2007 | June 26, 2007 |
| Plaintiff Gregory Requa sued Defendants Kent School District No. 415, Barbara Grohe (Superintendent) and Michael Albrecht (Principal) for violating his federal and state constitutional rights of free speech and due process, as well as depriving him of his liberty and property rights. Plaintiff alleges that he was suspended for 40 school days for posting a video on YouTube.com criticizing a teacher at the high school. |
| Parr v. Board of Trustees for the Twin Falls Public Library | May 25, 2006 | November 3, 2006 |
| First Amendment claim by patron who says he was denied access to library computers. Dismissed because patron did not claim actual injury - he was able to use computers at another library. |
| Nieto v. Flatau, et al | November 10, 2008 | |
| Parkmerced Investors Properties LLC et al v. Does 1-18 | September 23, 2008 | |
| DOE et al v. SCHOOL BOARD FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA et al | August 27, 2008 | |
| Plaintiffs alleged that school officials from the Defendant School Board for Santa Rosa County persistently and pervasively promoted their personal religious beliefs in the public schools and at school events. |
| STOCKHAM INTERESTS, LLC et al v. THE BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE et al | July 22, 2008 | |
| TAIT et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA | July 2, 2008 | |
| BIG HAT BOOKS et al v. PROSECUTORS: | May 7, 2008 | |
| Plaintiffs Big Hat Books, Boxcar Books and Community Center, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana Foundation, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Association of American Publishers, Entertainment Merchants Association, Freedom to Read Foundation, National Association of Recording Merchandisers, Great Lakes Booksellers Association, Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis Downtown Artists and Dealers Association challenges the constitutionality of House Enrolled Act No. 1042, which requires that persons and entities that intend to offer for sale or to sell literature and other matters deemed harmful to minors under Indiana law register with the Secretary of State and pay a fee. |
| HACKBART v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al | February 8, 2007 | |
| Plaintiff Hackbart alleges that Defendants the City of Pittsburgh and Sargeant Brian Elledge violated his rights under the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States by engaging in custom, pattern, practice and/or policy of authorizing its officers to issue citations under Pennsylvania’s disorderly conduct statute based upon the use of profane, but not obscene, language and gestures which are expressions protected by the First Amendment. Plaintiff further alleged that the City fails to appropriately train, supervise and discipline officers who issue disorderly conduct citations in violation of citizens’ rights of free expression. |
