| Case | Case Filed | Last Document |
|---|
| Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al | October 10, 2006 | November 6, 2007 |
| Plaintiff as Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, Inc. filed suit against Mayer Brown Rowe and Maw, LLP, Ronald Given and Charles W. Trautner for legal malpractice. Plaintiff alleged that Mayer Brown advised CMGT not to respond to Spehar Capital's motion for TRO. As a result, Spehar obtained a TRO and later a default judgment against CMGT for $17 million. Spehar then used the $17 million default judgment to file an involuntary petition for bankruptcy against CMGT. |
| Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow | July 12, 2006 | October 9, 2007 |
| Plaintiff alleged that defendant Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP committed legal malpractice when it issued a "more likely than not" opinion letter to indicate that the deductions arising from a tax saving strategy would be upheld when in fact such strategy should instead have been registered as a potentially abusive tax shelter. |
| EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown. | January 13, 2005 | October 5, 2007 |
| Plaintiff EEOC alleged that defendant Sidley Austin Brown & Wood violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) by maintaining and implementing an age-based retirement policy and by downgrading or expelling a class of attorney employees age 40 years or older on account of their age in or about October 1999. |
| Foley & Lardner, LLP v. Nathoo et al | September 4, 2007 | October 2, 2007 |
| GROSS v. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP | February 26, 2007 | September 27, 2007 |
| Plaintiff served as Senior Counsel to defendant Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. He asserted that defendant terminated his employment on the basis of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the D.C. Human Rights Act. |
| Dagnea Teshome v. O'Melveny & Myers | May 17, 2005 | September 24, 2007 |
| Paul Hastings Janofsky and Walker LLP v. Allison Lomas | August 14, 2007 | September 20, 2007 |
| Gilmore v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP | December 5, 2006 | September 19, 2007 |
| Plaintiff, a legal secretary employed by defendant Fullbright & Jaworski, LLP, alleged that defendant failed to make reasonable accommodations for her and terminated her because of her disability. |
| DZIAMINISKI v. KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART | May 8, 2007 | September 11, 2007 |
| LATHAM & WATKINS LLP v. EVERSON | April 6, 2007 | August 27, 2007 |
| Mobile Billboards of America, inc., California Mobile Billboards, et. al. v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker, LLP. | August 2, 2007 | August 10, 2007 |
| Jacquelin Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers LLP | February 27, 2004 | August 10, 2007 |
| Snyder et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al | May 10, 2007 | August 6, 2007 |
| Jung v. Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP et al | April 29, 2005 | June 22, 2007 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP v. United States Environmental Protection Agency | February 6, 2007 | June 7, 2007 |
| International Strategies Group, LTD v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al | September 15, 2004 | April 19, 2007 |
| Kilkenny v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al | July 20, 2005 | December 1, 2006 |
| Immunocept, LLC, et al v. Fulbright & Jaworski | May 6, 2005 | July 26, 2006 |
| Gordon v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al | April 28, 2006 | June 23, 2006 |
| JONES DAY v. SCRUSHY | March 13, 2006 | June 19, 2006 |
| Microsoft Corporation v. Ronald Alepin Morrison & Foerster et al | March 3, 2006 | May 1, 2006 |
| Microsoft Corporation sought an authorization to serve subpoenas to International Business Machines Corporation, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP and Maurits Dolmans regarding communications or correspondence between the parties and the European Commission relating to interoperability information. |
| LANICE v. HOGAN AND HARTSON LLP | May 13, 2005 | April 21, 2006 |
| Norkin v. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary L.L.P. | October 26, 2005 | March 31, 2006 |
| Plaintiff David Norkin alleged that Defendant DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, LLP committed professional malpractice and breached its fiduciary duty to him and Britestarr by operating under an undisclosed conflict of interest when it (1) provided him with advice in connection with his personal bankruptcy proceeding, and (2) recommended that Britestarr file for bankruptcy and that Norkin resign as its president. |
| Roberts v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP | September 16, 2005 | March 27, 2006 |
| STECHLER et al v. SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD, L.L.P. et al | July 12, 2005 | January 24, 2006 |
| Plaintiffs claim that defendants unlawfully developed and fraudulently induced plaintiffs to engage in a tax shelter, known as the Digital Options Strategy, by intentionally lying, hiding crucial information and also by assuring them that the strategy would pass IRS scrutiny if they were ever audited. |
| Davis v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart L.L.P. | November 19, 2004 | January 9, 2006 |
| Paul Eric Antoine v. Latham & Watkins et al | May 10, 2005 | July 25, 2005 |
| Seippel v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP | June 13, 2005 | June 23, 2005 |
| Angulo Capital Corp. et al v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP | April 23, 2004 | May 9, 2005 |
| Hogan and Hartson v. J P Lipson | April 26, 2004 | January 24, 2005 |
| Greenberg Traurig LLP v. Gale Corp. | August 2, 2007 | |
| Fulbright & Jaworski LLP v. Mariner Health Care Inc | March 28, 2006 | |
