Intellectual Property

CaseCase FiledLast Document
Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et alAugust 21, 2009November 6, 2009
Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLCAugust 11, 2009November 6, 2009
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Careerbuilder, LLC et alJune 1, 2009November 6, 2009
FPX, LLC v. Google, Inc. et alMay 11, 2009November 6, 2009
PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et alNovember 2, 2007November 6, 2009
Plaintiff PA Advisors, LLC allege that Defendants infringed no U.S. Patent No. 6,199,067 entitled "System and Method for Generating Personalized User Profiles and for Utilizing the Generated User Profiles to Perform Adaptive Internet Searches."
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et alSeptember 27, 2007November 6, 2009
Plaintiff Performance Pricing, Inc. sued Google Inc., AOL LLC, Microsoft Corporation and Yahoo! Inc. for infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,978,253 entitled "Systems and Methods for Transacting Business Over a Global Communications Network such as the Internet."
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et alAugust 27, 2007November 6, 2009
Polaris IP, LLC sued Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Amazon.com Inc., A9.com, Inc., Borders, Inc., Borders Group Inc., AOL LLC, America Online, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and IAC Search and Media, Inc. for patent infringement involving U.S. Patent No. 6,411,947 entitled "Automatic Message Interpretation and Routing System." Plaintiff alleges that defendants are infringing on the patent by implementing various websites that comprise interpreting electronic messages with rule base and case base knowledge engines.
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et alJuly 3, 2007November 6, 2009
Plaintiff alleges that Google's AdSense and AdWords technologies, Google Print Ads, and Yahoo's Publisher and Content Match technologies infringe on its patents.
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et alMay 4, 2007November 6, 2009
Plaintiff filed a class action law suit against YouTube and Google for allowing users to upload and distribute media that infringed on plaintiff's copyrights.
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et alNovember 19, 2004November 6, 2009
Plaintiff Perfect 10 sued defendant Google Inc. for displaying thumbnails of photographs copyrighted by the plaintiff. Consolidated with Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al. Additional Resources Ninth Circuit Opinion in Perfect 10 v. Google and Amazon.
Red Bend Software, Inc. et al v. GoogleOctober 26, 2009November 5, 2009
Benjamin v. Google Inc.October 5, 2009November 5, 2009
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et alJune 16, 2009November 5, 2009
Soaring Helmet Corporation v. Bill Me Inc et alJune 9, 2009November 5, 2009
Actus, LLC v. Bank of America Corp. et alApril 9, 2009November 5, 2009
Fairey et al v. The Associated PressFebruary 9, 2009November 5, 2009
Claim that iconic Obama poster infringes on AP photo copyright
Apple Inc. v. Psystar CorporationJuly 3, 2008November 5, 2009
Plaintiff Apple Inc. alleged that Defendant Psystar Corporation sold in commerce a computer named the OpenMac--subsequently changed to Open Computer--which runs a modified version of the Leopard operating system without authorization from Plaintiff and in violation of the terms of the Software License Agreement governing the use of Mac OS X software and Plaintiff's intellectual property., Defendant also provided direct copies and/or modified versions of Plaintiff's software updates.
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et alJanuary 31, 2008November 5, 2009
Plaintiff ESN, LLC alleged that Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys, LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,283,519 entitled "Distributed Edge Switching System for Voice-Over-Packet Multiservice Network."
Eric Dane et al v. Gawker Media LLC et alSeptember 23, 2009November 5, 2009
EMG Technology, LLC v. Apple, Inc.November 24, 2008November 4, 2009
EMG Technology lawsuit accuses Apple of infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196 in the way the iPhone navigates the Internet.
The Author's Guild et al v. Google Inc.September 20, 2005November 4, 2009
Plaintiffs The Author's Guide. Herbert Mitgang, Betty Miles and Daniel Hoffman sued Google Inc. for reproducing a digital copy of plaintiffs' works without the copyright holders' permission and in violation of the authors' rights under the copyright laws.
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et alOctober 6, 2009November 3, 2009
Joltid Limited v. Skype Technologies S.A. et alSeptember 16, 2009November 3, 2009
Luxo AS v. The Walt Disney Company et alSeptember 3, 2009November 3, 2009
The Luxo Lamp company has sued Disney (particularly it's child company Pixar) for trademark infringement because they are selling a version of the iconic lamp under the name "Luxo, Jr."
Leader Technologies Inc. v. Facebook Inc.November 19, 2008November 3, 2009
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et alNovember 21, 2007November 3, 2009
Plaintiff Software Rights Archive, LLC alleges that Defendants Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL LLC and Lycos, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,544,352 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Indexing, Searching and Displaying Data."
Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et alMarch 28, 2007November 3, 2009
ConnectU is suing Facebook for business torts and unfair business practices.
Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et alApril 15, 2008November 2, 2009
Publisher lawsuit against public university that makes electronic copies of course readings available to students without paying royalty fees.
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Mark Field, et alMarch 13, 2008November 2, 2009
House of Bryant Publications, L.L.C. v. A&E Television NetworksJune 3, 2009October 30, 2009
Plaintiffs claim A&E used short clip of "Rocky Top" synchronized in a television program, despite plaintiff's refusal to grant a license. Defense claims fair use, stating that the clip is only 12 seconds long and is background to a football game filled with ambient noise.
John Beck Amazing Profits, LLC v. Google Inc. et alMay 14, 2009October 30, 2009
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,November 6, 2007October 30, 2009
Plaintiffs Northwestern University and Jarg Corporation allege that Defendant Google, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,694,593 entitled "Distributed Computer Database System and Method."
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et alSeptember 4, 2007October 30, 2009
Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Warner Home VideoAugust 18, 2009October 29, 2009
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et alAugust 1, 2007October 29, 2009
Web Host Faces Potential Contributory Trademark Liability--Louis Vuitton v. Akanoc. By Professor Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.July 16, 2009October 28, 2009
St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Inc. v. Apple Inc.October 26, 2009October 27, 2009
Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et alSeptember 30, 2008October 27, 2009
jukebox to store dvds as DMCA violation
Eight Mile Style, LLC et al v. Apple Computer, IncorporatedJuly 30, 2007October 26, 2009
Eight Mile Style LLC and Martin Affiliated LLC alleges that they never authorized Universal to license Eminem's music to Apple for resale on the iTunes Music Store.
Blackwell Publishing, Incorporated et al v. MillerJune 28, 2007October 26, 2009
Plaintiffs allege that defendant Norman Miller d/b/a Excel Test Preparation operates a copy shop near the University of Michigan that allows students to reproduce their own coursepack, which includes journals articles and excerpts from books. Plaintiffs further allege that defendant does not arrange for permission to copy the materials in the coursepacks from the Copyright Clearance Center, INc.
Doe 1 et al v. Ciolli et alJune 8, 2007October 26, 2009
Two female Yale Law School students sued because defendants posted defamatory and threatening comments about them on an online forum at AutoAdmit.com.
Flowbee International, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc.August 13, 2009October 23, 2009
Google Inc. v. Traffic Information LLCJune 9, 2009October 23, 2009
JURIN et al v. GOOGLE, INC. et alOctober 22, 2009October 22, 2009
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC v. Forest River IncOctober 24, 2008October 22, 2009
Guerrilla Marketing Under False Pretenses Might Be Passing Off--Heartland v. Forest River. By Professor Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et alJuly 1, 2008October 22, 2009
Plaintiffs Google Inc., AOL LLC, Yahoo! Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Lycos, Inc. seek a declaratory judgment that they have not infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 5,544,352, 5,832,494 and 6,233,571 (Method and Apparatus for Indexing, Searching and Displaying Data), that such patents are invalid, and that Defendants L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive, LLC and Site Technologies, Inc. do not own the patents.
Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Google, Inc. et alFebruary 12, 2008October 21, 2009
Plaintiff Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC alleges that Defendants Google, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,043,450 entitled "Paid Search Engine Bid Management."
PEERMUSIC, III, LTD. et al v. MOTIVE FORCE LLC et alAugust 24, 2009October 20, 2009
Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.July 10, 2009October 20, 2009
Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.April 7, 2009October 20, 2009
Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et alAugust 18, 2008October 19, 2009
Cautionary Tale of Website Co-Ownership--Mikhlyn v. Bove. By Professor Eric Goldman
TechRadium v. Twitter, Inc.August 4, 2009October 16, 2009
Texas company TechRadium sues Twitter for violating their patents: Nos. 7,130,389, 7,496,183, and 7,519,165.
Evenflow, Inc. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc.August 20, 2009October 13, 2009
API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et alMay 12, 2009October 13, 2009
Specht et al v. Google Inc et alApril 28, 2009October 13, 2009
IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.November 16, 2007October 12, 2009
Plaintiffs IP Innovation LLC and Technology Licensing Corp. alleges that defendant Google, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patents No. 5,276,785 entitled "Moving Viewpoint With Respect to a Target in a Three Dimensional Workspace" and No. 5,675,819 entitled "Document Information Retrieval Using Global Word Co-Occurrence Patterns."
Clark v. The Walt Disney Company et alOctober 17, 2008October 9, 2009
Plaintiff Aaron Clark alleged that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,548,272 entitled "Talking Poster" by manufacturing, distributing and licensing the Hannah Montana Talking Poster and Cheetah Girls Talking Poster.
Timebase Pty Ltd v. Thomson Corporation, TheMarch 28, 2007October 7, 2009
Plaintiff Timebase Pty Ltd. sued defendant The Thomson Corporation for infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,233,592 entitled "System for electronic publishing."
Domino Recording Company, Inc. et al v. Interscope Geffen A & M Records et alOctober 2, 2009October 5, 2009
Scott v. Scribd, IncSeptember 18, 2009October 5, 2009
HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOOGLE INC.April 12, 2006October 5, 2009
Plaintiffs HyperPhrase Technologies LLC and HyperPhrase Inc. alleged that Defendant Google Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,434,567 entitled "Method for Specifying Enterprise-wide Database Address Formats," No. 6,507,837 entitled "Tiered and Content Based Database Searching," No. 6,516,321 entitled "Method for Database Address Specification," and No. 5,903,889 entitled "System and Method for Translating, Collecting and Archiving Patient Records for Automated Data Storage and Retrieval."
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Copier Country New York LLC et alDecember 29, 2008October 1, 2009
Virgin Records America, Inc v. ThomasApril 19, 2006October 1, 2009
Jury verdict in favor of RIAA - $222,000 judgment against Minnesota woman for making music files available via Kazaa, despite her denials of doing so.
Textscape, LLC v. Google, Inc.September 25, 2009September 30, 2009
Reed et al v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. et alJuly 22, 2008September 30, 2009
Plaintiffs Craig Reed and Survivor Films, Inc. alleged that Defendants failed to pay him a portion of the profits from "FREEBIRD...THE MOVIE" which incorporated portions of Plaintiff's personal video recordings of the Lynyrd Skynyrd band. Plaintiff s also alleged that Defendants used excerpts from Plaintiff's recordings without permission in LYNYRD SKYNYRD - LYVE FROM STEEL TOWN, LYNYRD SKYNYRD LYVE - THE VICIOUS CYCLE TOUR, 2003 NASHVILLE LIVE, as well as in the music viodes for SIMPLE MAN, FREEBIRD and SWEET HOME ALABAMA.
Web Tracking Solutions, Inc. et al v. Google, Inc.July 31, 2008September 29, 2009
Plaintiffs Web Tracking Solutions, Inc. and Daniel Wexler alleged that Defendant Google, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,960,409 entitled "Third-Party On-Line Accounting System and Method Therefor."
Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et alMay 12, 2009September 23, 2009
Aloft Media, LLC v. SAP AG et alJuly 14, 2009September 22, 2009
Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et alJuly 14, 2009September 22, 2009
Aloft Media, LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et alJuly 8, 2009September 22, 2009
Aloft Media, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc. et alDecember 30, 2008September 18, 2009
Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC alleged that Defendants Yahoo!, Inc., Google, Inc. and AOL LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,472,351 entitled "Mobile E-Mail Manager Interface with Integrated Instant Messaging and Phone Call Initiator Feature."
Google, Inc. v. EMSAT Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC et alMay 29, 2009September 16, 2009
Brave New Films 501 (C)(4) v. Weiner et alOctober 10, 2008September 15, 2009
Talk radio host Michael Weiner (aka Michael Savage) and his syndication network, Original Talk Radio Network, filed a DMCA takedown request for YouTube to remove a video made by Brave New Films containing clips of Savage's commentary. Brave New Films is suing Savage and OTRN for a declaratory judgment that Savage's material in the video is a fair use. Plaintiff is also suing Savage and OTRN for damages and injunctive relief, based on alleged misrepresentations made via the takedown notice to YouTube.
Salinger et al v. John Doe et alJune 1, 2009September 14, 2009
Joe Satriani v. Christopher Martin et alDecember 4, 2008September 14, 2009
Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et alMarch 13, 2007September 14, 2009
Plaintiffs Viacom International Inc., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, and Black Entertainment Television LLC alleged that Defendants YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC and Google Inc. infringed Plaintiffs' copyrights.
Aloft Media, LLC v. Google, Inc.November 19, 2008September 10, 2009
Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC alleged that Defendant Google, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,194,691 entitled "Network Browser Window with Adjacent Identifier Selector Interface for Storing Web Content."
Williams v. Scribd, Inc. et alAugust 25, 2009August 26, 2009
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Donruss Playoff, L.P. et alJanuary 21, 2009August 17, 2009
Minnesota, State of v. CMI of Kentucky, Inc.March 3, 2008August 13, 2009
Plaintiff State of Minnesota alleged that Defendant CMI of Kentucky, Inc. breached its contract for the sale and maintenance of a fleet of evidentiary breath test instruments by failing to provide the State with the computer source code used to program the computer-operated functions of the breath testing instrument. Plaintiff also stated that Defendant agreed to release information pertaining to the instrument when ordered to do so by courts handling cases in which an evidentiary breath test is part of the evidence and that any documentation and copyrighted material conceived or originated and arising out of the contract would become the sole property of the State.
Klausner Technologies Inc v. Verizon Wireless et alAugust 26, 2008August 11, 2009
Plaintiff Klausner Technologies, Inc. alleged that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 5,572,576 and 5,283,818 entitled "Telephone Answering Device Linking Displayed Data with Recorded Audio Message."
Jackson Browne v. John McCain et alAugust 14, 2008August 5, 2009
Jackson Browne is suing John McCain for using "Running on Empty" in his 2008 Presidential Campaign.
ASCENTIVE, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC.June 25, 2009July 31, 2009
Cygnus Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et alDecember 23, 2008July 31, 2009
MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et alOctober 25, 2006July 31, 2009
MDY Industries, LLC seeks a declaratory judgment that its product—WOWGLIDER—does not infringe on the Defendant's copyrights to World of Warcraft, violate the DMCA or interfere with the contractual relationships between Defendants and their World of Warcraft customers.
Microsoft Corporation v. Lam et alJune 15, 2009July 29, 2009
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Bill Jackson and Associates AppraisersOctober 20, 2008July 21, 2009
Picsel (Research) Ltd. et al v. Apple Inc.February 13, 2009July 20, 2009
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. ADS Construction et alOctober 21, 2008June 30, 2009
LaRussa v. Twitter Inc.June 5, 2009June 26, 2009
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. David Arffa, et alOctober 20, 2008June 15, 2009
Incorp Services, Inc., v. Legalzoom.com, Inc.,February 9, 2009June 5, 2009
GraphOn Corporation v. Google Inc.August 13, 2008June 5, 2009
Plaintiff GraphOn Corporation alleged that Defendant Google Inc. infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,324,538 and 6,850,940 entitled "Automated On-Line Information Services and Directory, Particularly for the World Wide Web," and U.S. Patent Nos. 7,028,034 and 7,269,591 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Providing a Dynamically-Updating Pay-For-Service Web Site."
Saint Louis University v. MeyerOctober 11, 2007June 4, 2009
Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et alMay 30, 2007May 27, 2009
Plaintiffs Certicom Corp. and Certicom Patent Holding Corp. alleged that Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony DADC US Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,563,928 entitled "Strengthened Public Key Protocol."
Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et alFebruary 27, 2009May 27, 2009
Plaintiff The Weather Underground, Inc. alleges Defendants Navigation Catalyst Systems Inc., Basic Fusion Inc., Connexus Corporation, and Firstlook Inc. used an automated process to register and use domain names that are confusingly similar to famous or distinctive trademarks owned by the Plaintiff.
Fremantlemedia North America, Inc. v. International Intimates Inc. et alOctober 14, 2008May 26, 2009
Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v. BunnellFebruary 23, 2006May 26, 2009
Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants for copyright infringement. Plaintiffs allege that defendants knowingly enable, encourage, induce and profit from massive online piracy of plaintiffs' copyright works through the operation of their TorrentSpy website.
BabyAge..com, Inc. v. Leachco, Inc.August 30, 2007May 6, 2009
Online Retailer's Link to House Brand from Manufacturer's Product Page Might Infringe--BabyAge v. Leachco. By Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Bourne Co. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et alOctober 3, 2007May 5, 2009
Plaintiff Bourne Co. alleged that defendants infringed plaintiff's copyright interests in the song "When You Wish Upon a Star." Defendants allegedly created an episode of "The Family Guy" titled "When You Wish Upon a Weinstein" that included a song "I Need a Jew." The song coupled anti-Semitic lyrics with plaintiff's song.
Coupons, Inc. v. StottlemireJuly 2, 2007May 5, 2009
Plaintiff Coupons, Inc. alleged that Defendant John Stottlemire intentionally circumvented technological measures used to limit the number of times a visitor to the coupons.com website may print a coupon.
Fremantlemedia North America, Inc. v. Benelux Corporation et alDecember 16, 2008April 27, 2009
Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC et alDecember 13, 2007April 27, 2009
Plaintiff Bid for Position, LLC alleges that Defendants AOL, LLC, Google, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and MIVA, INc. infringed on Patent No. 7,225,151 entitled "Online Auction Bid Management System and Method."
Soilworks LLC v Midwest Industrial Supply IncSeptember 7, 2006April 16, 2009
Plaintiff Soilworks, LLC alleged that Defendant Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. violated the Lanham Act, the Arizona Deceptive Trade Practices Act and Arizona common law by disparaging Plaintiff and its products and falsely representing that Plaintiff is infringing patent rights of Defendant.
Priest et al v Google Inc.December 11, 2008April 13, 2009
Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. v. Soilworks, LLCJune 6, 2008April 10, 2009
Plaintiff Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. alleged that Defendant Soilworks, LLC infringed its trademark, violated the Lanham Act and engaged in unfair competition.
21 srl v. Apple Inc. et alDecember 23, 2008April 3, 2009
PACid Group, LLC v. Apple Inc. et alMarch 30, 2009March 30, 2009
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Klein & Heuchan, Inc. et alJune 17, 2008March 26, 2009
Accolade Systems LLC v. Micron Technology Inc et alMarch 24, 2009March 24, 2009
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Apple, Inc.March 24, 2009March 24, 2009
Video Professor, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.March 23, 2009March 24, 2009
Marketing Info v. Board of Trustees, et alAugust 18, 2006March 19, 2009
Read more at the Stanford Copyright and Fair Use, Fairly Used blog.
Yahoo! Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.November 21, 2008March 16, 2009
NERDS ON CALL, INC. v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC. et alApril 27, 2007March 9, 2009
Trafficschool.com.Inc v. Drivers Ed Direct LLCNovember 28, 2006March 9, 2009
Plaintiff TrafficSchool.com, Inc. and Drivers Ed Direct, LLC alleged that Defendants eDriver, Inc., Online Guru, Inc., Find My Specialist, Inc., Seriousnet, Inc., Ravi K. Lahoti and Raj Lahoti engaged in unfair competition and false advertising under the Lanham Act and the California Business and Professions Code by portraying themselves as an official government motor vehicles agency and then explicitly recommending particular traffic schools or driver's education course providers.
Clear With Computers, LLC v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. et alFebruary 27, 2009February 27, 2009
Plaintiff Clear With Computers, LLC alleged that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,615,342 entitled "Electronic Proposal Preparation System" by methods practiced on various websites, making and using supply chain methods, sales methods, sales systems, and inventory systems.
Jones Day v. BlockShopper.com et alAugust 12, 2008February 24, 2009
Plaintiff Jones Day alleged that Defendants BlockShopper.com, Brian Timpone and Edward Weinhaus used Jones Day marks, links to the Jones Day web site and used proprietary information from the Jones Day web site to create the false impression that Jones Day is affiliated and/or approved, sponsored or endorsed the business conducted by the Defendants.
The Financial Times Limited v. The Blackstone Group, L.P. et alJanuary 28, 2009February 20, 2009
Plaintiff The Financial Times Limited alleges that Defendant The Blackstone Group, L.P. shared an individual, personal subscription to FT.com with its agents and employees.
Heartbrand Beef, Inc. v. Lobel's of New York, LLC et alJuly 25, 2008February 12, 2009
PARKER v. YAHOO!, INC. et alJuly 13, 2007February 10, 2009
Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker alleged that Defendants Yahoo!, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation infringed on Plaintiff's registered works--Outfoxing the Foxes, 29 Reasons Not to Be a Nice Guy and Why Hotties Choose Losers--by copying, storing and displaying his works within its cache.
Silvers v. Google, Inc.May 4, 2005February 10, 2009
Plaintiff Steven A. Silvers alleged that defendant Google, Inc. infringed on plaintiff's GOOGLES mark, and sought to enjoin Google from using the GOOGLE mark in connection with the advertising, promoting, marketing and sale of children's goods and services.
Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc.July 23, 2008February 6, 2009
Plaintiff LimitNone, LLC alleged that Defendant Google Inc. violated the Illinois Trade Secrets Act and Illinois Consumer Fraud & Deceptive Business Practices Act. Plaintiff charged that Defendant improperly accessed and copied Plaintiff's gMove email migration software and then created and released a competing software product called Google Email Uploader.
Virgin America, Inc. v. Adrants Publishing, LLC et alJanuary 26, 2009January 30, 2009
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et alMarch 11, 2005January 15, 2009
Plaintiff Stelor Productions Inc. alleged that defendant Oogles N Googles infringed on plaintiff's registered trademarks to OOGLES, OOGLE, IGGLE and OOGGLE.
Motorola Inc v. Research In Motion Limited et alJanuary 13, 2009January 14, 2009
CoStar Realty Information, Inc., et al v. Wayne Mascia AssociatesAugust 28, 2008January 14, 2009
Amiga Inc v. Hyperion VOFApril 26, 2007January 6, 2009
Plaintiff Amiga Inc. alleges that it entered into an (OEM) License and Software Development Agreement with defendant Hyperion VOF for the development of Amiga's next generation operating system software, Amiga OS 4. Plaintiff further alleges defendant breached the agreement by marketing OS 4 outside the scope of the license, granting third parties the right to distribute OS 4 and use Amiga trademarks, refusing to turn over the source code and object code for OS 4, and failing to deliver OS 4 within the timeline specified in the contract.
Dozier Internet Law, P.C. v. Riley et alOctober 2, 2008December 5, 2008
craigslist, Inc. v. BertzNovember 5, 2008November 24, 2008
Plaintiff craigslist, Inc. alleged that Defendant George Berz d/b/a adbomber.com sold software and services that enabled users to repetitiously post duplicative ads on craigslist, in multiple categories on craigslist, and in multiple geographic areas on craigslist, and that purposefully circumvent craigslist security measures to do so. Plaintiff also alleged that Defendant had created copies of craiglist's copyrighted website and accessed craigslist's computer system without and in excess of authorization.
Burck v. Mars, Incorporated et alFebruary 11, 2008November 7, 2008
Plaintiff Robert Burck d/b/a The Naked Cowboy alleges that Defendants Mars, Inc. and Chute Gerdeman, Inc. infringed his trademark in his get-up, featuring a white cowboy hat, white boots, white underpants and an acoustic guitar.
FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle NetworkJanuary 18, 2006November 7, 2008
Plaintiff FreecycleSunnyvale sought a declaratory judgment that the use of freecycle, freecycling and its logo does not infringe the trademark rights of Defendant The Freecycle Network.
Verizon California Inc. et al v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc. et al.April 15, 2008November 4, 2008
Plaintiffs Verizon California Inc., Verizon Trademark Services LLC and Verizon Licensing Company alleged that Defendants Navigation Catalyst Systems Inc. and Basic Fusion Inc. have used an automated process to register and use over three million domain names, many of which are confusingly similar to famous or distinctive trademarks owned by others.
DVDPlay Inc. v. Redbox Automated Retail LLCOctober 28, 2008October 28, 2008
Media Queue, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et alOctober 24, 2008October 27, 2008
Plaintiff Media Queue, LLC alleged that Defendants Netflix, Inc., Blockbuster, Inc., GameFly, Inc., Greencine, LLC and Greencine Holdings, LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,389,243 entitled "Notification System and Method for Media Queue."
i.think inc v. Minekey Inc et alFebruary 1, 2008October 21, 2008
Plaintiff i.think inc. alleged that Defendants Minekey, Inc. and Delip Andra infringed on Plaintiff's service mark by using the iThink mark in connection with online opinion polls on Internet networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Hi5 and Friendster.
Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et alSeptember 30, 2008October 3, 2008
Plaintiff RealNetworks, Inc. and RealNetworks Home Entertainment, Inc. filed an action for a declaratory judgment that the CSS License Agreement permits Plaintiffs to manufacture and offer for sale the RealDVD product and that the Plaintiffs do not violate the DMCA.
Universal City Studios Productions LLLP et al v. RealNetworks, Inc. et alSeptember 30, 2008October 3, 2008
WIAV Solutions LLC v. Research In Motion, Ltd. et alSeptember 26, 2008September 26, 2008
Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et alDecember 13, 2004September 19, 2008
Plaintiffs Ralph Vargas and Bland-Rickey Roberts d/b/a JBR Music Group alleged that Defendants Pfizer Inc., Publicis Inc., Fluid Music, East West Communications Inc. and Brian Transeau infringed on Plaintiffs' copyright to "Bust Dat Groove Without Ride." Defendants allegedly used key musical themes and/or jingles from the composition to promote the sales of Celebrex and misattributed the work to Defendant Transeau.
Stockwire Research Group, Inc. et al v. Lebed et alOctober 10, 2007September 18, 2008
IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.June 23, 2006September 10, 2008
Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. alleged that Defendant Veoh Networks, Inc. infringed the copyrights in Plaintiff's works by reproducing, distributing and displaying the works on Defendant's website without Plaintiff's approval or authorization.
Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.August 29, 2008September 4, 2008
Pacific Law Center et al v. Saadat-NejadMarch 13, 2007September 2, 2008
Plaintiffs Pacific Law Center and Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP alleged that Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, a former client, engaged in trademark infringement, cybersquatting and unfair competition by registering and using domain names confusingly similar to those of the Plaintiffs to disparage them.
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Google Inc.September 10, 2007August 15, 2008
Plaintiff Illinois Computer Research, LLC alleges that defendant Google Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,111,252 entitled "Enhancing Touch and Feel on the Internet."
Shloss v. Sweeney et alJune 12, 2006August 12, 2008
Complaint for a declaratory judgment and injunction. Stanford author of biography of James Joyce's daughter in which the publisher redacted large amounts due to threats of lawsuit by Joyce estate. Author wanted to put supporting material on website. Raises issue of fsir use applied to scholarly...
Hysitron Incorporated v. MTS Systems CorporationMarch 14, 2007August 11, 2008
Plaintiff Hysitron Incorporated alleged that Defendant MTS Systems Corporation infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,026,677 and 5,553,486 entitled "Apparatus for Microindentation Hardness Testing and Surface Imaging Incorporating a Multi-Plate Capacitor System."
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. et al v. eBay Inc.June 18, 2004August 11, 2008
Gibson Guitar Corporation v. Harmonix Music Systems, Inc. et alMarch 20, 2008August 8, 2008
Plaintiff Gibson Guitar Corporation alleges that Defendants Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., MTV Networks and Electronic Arts, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,990,405 entitled "System and Method for Generating and Controlling a Simulated Musical Concert Experience." The suit relates to the Guitar Hero and Rock Band series of products.
Digital Background Corporation v. Apple, Inc.July 30, 2008August 5, 2008
Plaintiff Digital Background Corporation alleged that Defendant Apple Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,764,306 entitled "Real-Time Method of Digitally Altering a Video Data Stream to Remove Portions of the Original Image and Substitute Elements to Create a New Image." Defendant Apple Inc. counterclaimed and requested declaratory judgment that the '306 patent claims are invalid, unenforceable and not infringed.
Verne Troyer v. Ranae Shrider et alJuly 31, 2008August 1, 2008
Plaintiff Verne Troyer alleged that Defendant Ranae Shrider persuaded him to make a private sex tape, but later leaked a portion of the tape to a tabloid internet website in an attempt to sell the full version to the highest bidder.
Stragent, LLC v. Nokia Inc. et alJuly 29, 2008July 30, 2008
Plaintiff Stragent, LLC alleged that Defendants Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Motorola, Inc., Palm, Inc., Research in Motion, Ltd., Research in Motion Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericcson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., American Online, Inc., AOL LLC, AT&T, Inc., Google, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and Yahoo!, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,665,722 entitled "Store-and-forward packet radio system and method."
Yahoo! Inc. v. Travelcomm Industries, Inc. et alJuly 29, 2008July 30, 2008
Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc. alleged that Defendants Travelcomm Industries, Inc. d/b/a Travelcomm, Inc., Travelcom, Inc., Telecom Industries, Inc. Cancunbestfares.com, Vacations Inc., I.R.R., Inc., Island Reef Resorts d/b/a Island Reefs Resort, Inc., Rigoberto Sotolongo, Peter Sotolongo a/k/a Pedro Sotolongo, Daniel Marshall and Joe Fontina had masqueraded as Yahoo! for the purpose of deceiving consumers by disseminating unsolicited facsimiles that imitate the YAHOO! Travel website for the advertisement of Defendants' travel packages when Defendants have no affiliation or connection with Yahoo!.
Anascape, Ltd v. Nintendo of America, Inc.July 18, 2008July 29, 2008
Hasbro, Inc. v. RJ Softwares et alJuly 24, 2008July 28, 2008
Plaintiff Hasbro, Inc. alleged that Defendants RJ Softwares, Rajat Agarwalla and Jayant Agarwalla infringed on Plaintiff's trademark and copyright by creating and publicly displaying an online game that copies the essential and original elements of the Scrabble board game and promoting and profiting from it in commerce in the United States under the confusingly similar Scrabulous name.
CafePress.com, Inc. v. Republican National CommitteeJuly 16, 2008July 22, 2008
Plaintiff CafePress.com, Inc. filed a complaint for declaratory relief against Defendant Republican National Committee. Plaintiff sought protection against a threat of trademark litigation by Defendant over the use of the acronym GOP and elephant symbol on t-shirts, stickers and other items.
MAULE v. COLBERT et alJuly 17, 2008July 18, 2008
Plaintiff R. Bradley Maule alleged that Defendants Stephen Colbert, Busboy Productions, Spartina Productions, Comedy Partners LLC, MTV Networks and Viacom International Inc. infringed on Plaintiff's copyright by using his photo of Philadelphia's Mayor Michael Nutter as an insert beside Defendant Colbert.
Mark Mishak v. Google, Inc. et alDecember 20, 2007July 18, 2008
Plaintiff Mark Mishak d/b/a INEEDATV.com alleges that Defendants have sold keywords identical to Plaintiff's trademarks--"I Need a TV"--to various third parties and have deliberately manipulated the search engine results so that when consumers use these search engines to find Plaintiff's products and services, the consumers are unwittingly diverted to competitors' products and services.
Aguiar v. Webb et alSeptember 7, 2007July 17, 2008
Copyright and trademark infringement claims against documentary maker's promotional website and film trailer.
American Airlines Inc v. Google IncAugust 16, 2007July 17, 2008
American Airlines is suing Google for allowing companies to show ads when its trademarks, including (but not limited to) "AMERICAN AIRLINES" "AMERICAN EAGLE" "AA" "A A" "AA.COM" "AMERICAN AIRLINES CENTER" "AADVANTAGE" "AMERICAN CONNECTION" "AMERICANAIRLINES" are searched on.
Lennon et al v. Premise Media Corporation, L.P. et alApril 22, 2008July 16, 2008
Copyright suit against Premise Media by Yoko Ono concerning use of John Lennon's song "Imagine" in documentary "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed"
Typhoon Touch Technologies, Inc et al v. Motion Computing, Inc et alDecember 5, 2007July 16, 2008
Plaintiff Typhoon Touch Technologies Inc. and Nova Mobility Systems Inc. alleged that Defendants Dell, Inc., Xplore Technologies Corporation of America, San Dune Ventures, Inc., Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Panasonic Corporation of North America, Apple Inc., HTC America, Inc., Palm, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Nokia Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. for infringing on U.S. Patent No. 5,379,057 and 5,675,362 entitled "Portable Computer with Touch Screen and Computer System Employing Same."
International Information Systems Security Certifications Consortium v. Degraphenreed et alNovember 16, 2007July 16, 2008
Plaintiff International Information Systems Security Certifications Consortium sued Defendants Miko Degraphenreed, Degrapheinread Information Systems Security Corporation, Google, Incorporated and Yahoo!, Incorporated for trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, dilution, and deceptive trade practice, misappropriation and unjust enrichment. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants infringed and violated (ISC2)'s rights to its long-standing and valuable registered mark CISSP®.
CROSS ATLANTIC CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. FACEBOOK, INC. et alJuly 3, 2007July 16, 2008
Plaintiff Cross Atlantic Capital Partners Inc. alleges that defendant Facebook, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,518,629 B2 entitled "System for creating a community for users with common interests to interact in."
Aloft Media LLC v. Microsoft CorporationFebruary 22, 2008July 15, 2008
Plaintiff Aloft Media LLC alleges that Defendant Microsoft Corp. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,901,393 entitled "System, Method and Computer Program Product for a Customer-Centric Collaborative Protocol."
NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, IncorporatedFebruary 2, 2004July 15, 2008
Plaintiff NetJumper, L.L.C. sued defendant Google, Inc. for patent infringement and alleged that Google Toolbar and Google Viewer infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,890,172 and U.S. Patent No. 6,226,655, both entitled "Method and Apparatus for Retrieving Data from a Network Using Linked Location Identifiers." Defendant Google counterclaimed for trademark infringement.
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.March 14, 2008July 14, 2008
Plaintiff Mirror Worlds LLC alleges that Defendant Apple, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,006,227 and 6,638,313 B1 entitled "Document Stream Operating System" and 6,725,427 B2 entitled "Document Stream Operating System with Document Organizing and Display Facilities," 6,768,999 B2 entitled "Enterprise, Stream-Based Information Management System"
Reinhardt v. Wal-mart Stores, Inc. et alSeptember 21, 2007July 10, 2008
Plaintiff Richard Reinhardt (p/k/a Richie Ramone) alleges that Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Apple, Inc., RealNetworks, Inc., Taco Tunes, Inc., Ramones Productions, Inc., Estate of John Cummings, Herzog & Strauss and Ira Herzog infringed on Plaintiff's copyright to six songs he authored while a member of The Ramones. Plaintiff alleges that he never licensed or authorized the use of his compositions in any digital formats.
Everything Baseball Limited, LLC v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company et alJuly 7, 2008July 9, 2008
Plaintiff Everything Baseball Limited, LLC alleged that Defendants Wilson Sporting Goods Company, Hunt Wilson International Ltd., Schutt Sports, Inc., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc., Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Ampac Enterprises, Inc., Rawlings Sporting Goods, Inc., Adidas AG, Reebok International Ltd., Riddell Sports Inc., Diamond Sports Co. Inc. and Nocona Athletic Goods Company infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,161,226 entitled "Baseball Chest Protector".
Apple Corps Limited et al v. Fuego Entertainment, Inc. et alMarch 21, 2008July 9, 2008
Plaintiff Apple Corps Limited and Apple Records, Inc. alleges that defendants have attempted to release unauthorized bootleg recordings of musical performances of The Beatles from Hamburg Germany's Star-Club in 1962.
Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Project Playlist, IncApril 28, 2008July 1, 2008
Plaintiffs Atlantic Recording Corporation, Capitol Records, LLC, Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., Interscope Records, Motown Record Company, L.P., Priority Records LLC, UMG Recordings, Inc., Virgin Records America, Inc., and Warner Bros. Records Inc. allege that Defendant Project Playlist, Inc. performs and reproduces Plaintiffs' valuable works without any authorization and without paying any compensation to Plaintiffs.
Elsevier Inc. v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.June 17, 2008June 30, 2008
Plaintiff Elsevier Inc. alleges that Defendant Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. infringed the copyright in certain medical illustrations of the late Frank K. Netter, M.D. and/or breached a license agreement for the copyright on the medical illustrations.
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.March 20, 2008June 30, 2008
Plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Inc. alleged that Defendants California Products International, Inc., Mohamad Ali Khalil and Kasem Mohamad Harkous willfully infringed on Plaintiff's trademarks, copyrights and other rights related to Plaintiff's prepaid wireless service and specially manufactured wireless telephones. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants engaged in unlawful business practices involving the unauthorized and unlawful bulk purchase and reale of TracFone/NET10 Prepaid Phones, unauthorized and unlawful computer unlocking or reflashing of TracFone/NET10 Prepaid Phones, alteration of TracFone's copyrighted and proprietary software computer code installed in the Phones and trafficking of the Phones for profit.
Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC v. Apple, Inc.February 6, 2008June 30, 2008
Plaintiff Restricted Spending Solutions LLC alleged that Defendant Apple Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,143,064 entitled "Controlled Entertainment Spending Account."
Klausner Technologies Inc v. Apple Inc et alMarch 19, 2008June 20, 2008
Plaintiff Klausner Technologies, Inc. alleges that Defendants Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,283,818 entitled "Telephone Answering Device Linking Displayed Data with Recorded Audio Message."
Gibson Guitar Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et alMarch 17, 2008June 18, 2008
Plaintiff Gibson Guitar Corporation alleges that Defendants Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corporation, Kmart Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., GameStope Corporation and Toys-R-Us Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,990,405 entitled "System and Method for Generating and Controlling a Simulated Musical Concert Experience" by selling Guitar Hero series of video games.
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.September 21, 2006June 10, 2008
Plaintiff Apple Computer, Inc. alleged that defendant Podfitness, Inc.uses trade names and marks (PODFITNESS.COM and PODFITNESS) that are highly similar to and confusingly similar to Apple's famous trademarks (IPOD), and that defendant intentionally sought to imply an association with Apple in its marketing and advertising.
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et alJune 6, 2007June 2, 2008
Plaintiff alleges that defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,681,120 entitled "Mobile Entertainment and Communication Device."
Allen v. American Apparel, Inc.March 31, 2008May 27, 2008
Plaintiff Woody Allen alleged that Defendant American Apparel, Inc. used Plaintiff's image and likeness for advertising purposes without permission or consent.
Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.March 12, 2008May 20, 2008
Plaintiff ZapMedia Services Inc. alleges that Defendant Apple, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,020,704 entitled "System and method for distributing media assets to user devices via a portal synchronized by said user devices " and 7,343,414 entitled "GUI driving media playback device."
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated v. Real Self, IncorporatedJanuary 7, 2008May 19, 2008
Lifestyle Lift Tries to Use TM Law to Shut Down User Discussions; Website Countersues for Shilling--Lifestyle Lift v. RealSelf. By Professor Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Inc. et al v. Payman Simoni et alOctober 26, 2007May 16, 2008
Apple Inc. v. Atico International USA Inc. et alMay 14, 2008May 15, 2008
Plaintiff Apple Inc. alleged that Defendants Atico International USA Inc. and New Atico International Limited Corporation manufactured and sold iPod accessories which were not licensed or otherwise sponsored by Apple. Defendants also allegedly infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,305,506 entitled "Method and System for Transferring Status Information Between a Media Player and an Accessory," Nos. D551,212, D551,213, and D552,085 entitled "Dock Insert," and No. D558,738 entitled "Docking Station."
Datatreasury Corporation v. Citizens Bank of Rhode Island et alMay 2, 2008May 2, 2008
Plaintiff DataTreasury Corporation alleged that Defendants Citizens Bank of Rhode Island, RBS Citizens, National Association, UBS AG and Comerica Bank infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,910,988 and 6,032,137 entitled "Remote Image Capture With Centralized Processing and Storage," 5,265,007 entitled "Central Check Clearing System," and 5,717,868 entitled "Electronic Payment Interchange Concentrator."
Terraserver.com, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation et alMay 2, 2008May 2, 2008
Plaintiff Terraserver.com Inc. alleged that Defendant Microsoft Corporation set up a competing website and satellite imagery service that infringes on Plaintiff's registered trademarks and trade dress.
Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AOL LLC et alApril 30, 2008April 30, 2008
Plaintiff BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. alleged that Defendants AOL LLC and Yahoo! Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,987,606 entitled "Method and System for Content Filtering Information Retrieved from an Internet Computer Network."
Corbis Corporation vs. Arnold Moving Company, LLCAugust 1, 2007April 30, 2008
Plaintiff licenses digital images to publishers, advertisers, design agencies, filmmakers and other creative professionals. Plaintiff alleges that WebTamers Web Promotion redesigned the website of Defendant Sterling International. In the course of the redesign, Defendant or its agents downloaded Corbis images and uploaded them to Defendant's website without authorization and without paying for them.
Milan v. Apple IncorporatedApril 24, 2008April 25, 2008
Plaintiff Henry Milan alleges that Defendant Apple, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,991,483 B1 entitled "Flash Memory Drive with Quick Connector."
Microsoft Corporation v. Dauben IncJanuary 22, 2008April 10, 2008
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation alleges that Defendant Dauben, Inc. d/b/a Texas International Property Associates infringed on Microsoft's trade and service marks by registering Internet domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to Microsoft's trademarks and service marks.
Perfect 10, Inc v. Microsoft, Inc et alAugust 8, 2007March 25, 2008
Adult publisher alleges that Microsoft's MSN search engine makes thumbnail images available in search results that infringe publisher's copyrights. Related suits against Google and Amazon for similar claims.
Tafas v. Dudas et alAugust 22, 2007March 12, 2008
Plaintiff Triantafyllos Tafas sought to prevent Defendants Jon Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office from implementing Section 1.75 and 1.78 of certain new federal regulations published by the USPTO at 72 Fed. Reg. No. 161 on August 21, 2007 entitled Changes To Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications; Final Rule.
F & G Research, Inc v. Google, IncNovember 29, 2007March 6, 2008
Plaintiff F & G Research, Inc. alleges that Defendant Google Inc. infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,313,229 entitled "Mouse and Method for Concurrent Cursor Position and Scrolling Control."
F & G Research, Inc. v. Google, Inc.June 22, 2006March 6, 2008
Plaintiff F & G Research, Inc. sued Google, Inc. for patent infringement over U.S. Patent No. 5,313,229 entitled "Mouse and Method for Concurrent Cursor Position and Scrolling Control."
Maplewood Software Inc v. Microsoft CorporationFebruary 15, 2008March 4, 2008
Plaintiff Maplewood Software, Inc. alleged that Defendant Microsoft Corporation infringed on Plaintiff's copyright in the TUPLE database.
Cisco Sys Inc et al v. ESN LLCOctober 16, 2007March 4, 2008
Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys LLC sought a declaratory judgment that they do not infringe any valid and enforceable claim of U.S. Patent No. 7,283,519.
Aloft Media LLC v. Microsoft CorporationFebruary 22, 2008February 22, 2008
Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC alleged that Defendant Microsoft Corporation infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,305,625 entitled "Data Networking System and Method for Interfacing a User."
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Centers & Malls, LLC et alMay 8, 2007February 21, 2008
Board of Law Examiners v. West Publishing Corporation et alJune 8, 2007February 20, 2008
North Carolina Board of Law Examiners alleges that BAR/BRI, owned by West Publishing Corp. and The Thomson Corp., engaged in wholesale copying and distribution of copyrighted questions that have appeared on North Carolina bar examinations.
Valueclick Inc v. Revenue Science IncMarch 28, 2007February 12, 2008
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. AOL, LLC. et alDecember 20, 2007February 11, 2008
Plaintiff Beneficial Innovations, Inc. alleges that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,712,702 entitled "Method and System for Playing Games on a Network" and 6,183,336 entitled "Network Gaming System."
David Grisman et al v. UMG Recordings Inc et alMay 3, 2007February 8, 2008
Plaintiff David Grisman d/b/a Dawg Music and Rodney Franklin d/b/a Maicaboom Music allege that Defendant Warner Music Group Corp., Rhino Entertainment Company, Ryko Corporation, Instinct Records, Apple Computer, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, AOL Music Now, LLC, Yahoo!, Inc., RealNetworks Digital Music of California, Inc. infringed on Plaintiff's copyrighted work "The Groove."
iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.April 17, 2007February 7, 2008
Plaintiff iLOR, LLC alleges that Google, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,206,839 entitled "Method for Adding a User Selected Function to a Hyperlink."
WI-Lan, Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et alOctober 31, 2007February 6, 2008
Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. sued Defendants Suppliers, Broadcom Corporation, Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc. and Circuit City Stores, Inc. for infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,282,222 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Multiple Access Between Transceivers in Wireless Communications Using OFDM Spread Spectrum" and RE37,802 entitled "Multicode Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum."
Doe v. Geller et alMay 8, 2007February 4, 2008
Plaintiff uploaded to YouTube a portion of "Secrets of the Psychics," a NOVA video showing the magician James Randi challenging the performance techniques of Uri Geller. Subsequently, the defendants demanded that YouTube take down the video pursuant to the DMCA. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages for misrepresentation of copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Freeplay Music Corp v. X-Cast Entertainment LLC et alJuly 25, 2007January 31, 2008
The Associated Press v. All Headline News Corp. et alJanuary 14, 2008January 15, 2008
Plaintiff The Associated Press alleged that Defendants All Headline News Corp., AHN Media Corp., W. Jeffrey Brown and Danielle George hired writers to copy and rewrite AP news stories.
AutoText Technologies, Inc. v. Apple, inc. et alNovember 9, 2007January 9, 2008
Plaintiff AutoText Technologies, Inc. alleges Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,305,205 entitled "Computer-Assisted Transcription Apparatus."
Louden v. Yahoo!, Inc.October 1, 2007January 4, 2008
Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) claim by artist who claims her artwork "Reflecting Tips, 2001" was desecrated when grounds crew used weed whackers on the lawn the art was situated on.
HAROLD C. " HAL" TURNER v. 4CHAN.ORG et alJanuary 19, 2007December 17, 2007
Plaintiff Harold C. Turner d/b/a Turner Radio Network d/b/a Hal Turner Radio Show alleged that Defendants 4chan.org, 7chan.org, ebaumsworld.com, nexisonline.com and abjects.com posted unauthorized copies of his radio shows online, attacked Plaintiff's server so as to make it unavailable, and placed unauthorized orders for goods, services and merchandise from third parties in Plaintiff's name.
Recorded Books, LLC v. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.May 31, 2007November 30, 2007
Breach of contract, copyright, Lanham Act claims against OCLC/NetLibrary
LOTTOTRON, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATIONOctober 22, 2007November 26, 2007
Plaintiff Lottotron, Inc. alleged that defendant Microsoft Corporation's online poker and casino games infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,921,865, 5,910,047 and 5,415,416 all entitled "Computerized Lottery Wagering System" and U.S Patent No.,5,816,919 entitled "Computer Lottery Wagering System".
Freeplay Music Corp v. Exquisite Multimedia Inc et alJuly 25, 2007November 26, 2007
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc et alOctober 15, 2007November 20, 2007
Plaintiff ESN, LLC alleged that Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys, LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,283,519 entitled "Distributed Edge Switching System for Voice-Over-Packet Multiservice Network."
Eros, LLC v. DoeJuly 3, 2007November 16, 2007
Plaintiff Eros, LLC, a maker and seller of virtual adult-themed objects within the Second Life platform, sued defendants and alleged that they have made and sold unauthorized copies of plaintiff's virtual products within Second Life using plaintiff's trademark.
Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corporatioh et alNovember 7, 2007November 15, 2007
Plaintiff Microlinc, LLC alleges that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,009,488 entitled "Computer Having Packet-Based Interconnect Channel."
Veoh Networks, Inc. v. UMG Recordings, Inc. et alAugust 9, 2007November 15, 2007
Plaintiff Veoh Networks, Inc. is a video hosting service that provides a mechanism for third parties to share video on the Internet. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that (1) it has no liability to defendants for the unsolicited posting of content on the Veoh website; (2) it is not liable for direct, contributory or vicarious infringement of defendants' copyrights; (3) it is not liable for inducing the infringement of any of defendants' copyrights; (4) defendants are not entitled to any injunctions against plaintiff; and (5) it is entitled to safe harbor pursuant to 17 USC § 512(c).
Spark Network Services, Inc. v. Match.Com, LP et alJanuary 30, 2007November 15, 2007
Plaintiff Spark Network Services, Inc. alleged that defendants Match.com, LP, eHarmony.com, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,272,467 B1 entitled "System for Data Collection and Matching Compatible Profiles."
BidZirk LLC et al v. SmithJanuary 10, 2006November 15, 2007
Plaintiff BidZirk, LLC, Daniel G. Schmidt, III, and Jill Patterson sued Defendant Philip Russ Smith over a review of BidZirk's auction services that Defendant had posted on his blog at www.jackwhispers.blogspot.com.
Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation v. YouTube, Inc.October 30, 2006November 9, 2007
Plaintiff Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation operates a website at utube.com. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of confusion in the minds of consumers, the spillover of nuisance traffic to plaintiff's website has destroyed the value of plaintiff's trademark and internet property, repeatedly caused the shut down of plaintiff's website, increased plaintiff's internet costs and damaged the plaintiff's good reputation.
Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.September 13, 2007November 8, 2007
Plaintiff Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC alleged that defendant Yahoo! Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,043,450 entitled "Paid Search Engine Bid Management."
Microsoft Corporation v. Kovyrin et alSeptember 10, 2007November 7, 2007
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation alleges that defendants have registered numerous Internet domain names that contain or consist of Microsoft's marks and/or intentional misspellings of Microsoft's marks.
IO Group, Inc. v. GonzalesSeptember 28, 2007November 6, 2007
Plaintiff IO Group, Inc. d/b/a Titan Media alleged that defendant Gilbert Michael Gonzales reproduced, distributed and publicly displayed certain Titan Media-owned photographs and audiovisual works on various blogs.
Whitney Information, et al v. Xcentric Ventures, et alJanuary 27, 2004November 6, 2007
Plaintiffs Whitney Information Network, Inc. and Russ Whitney alleged that defendants Xcentric Ventures, LLC, badbusinessbureau.org, and Ed Magedson (1) used plaintiffs' trademarks in commerce in a manner likely to cause consumer confusion and (2) published stories that are false about the plaintiffs with the intent to injure plaintiffs, their business reputation, and to illegally divert customers away from plaintiffs.
Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.March 27, 2007November 5, 2007
Plaintiff Antor Media Corporation alleged that MetaCafe, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,734,961 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Information Recorded on Information Storage Means from a Central Server to Subscribers via a High Data Rate Digital Telecommunications Network."
Nota Music Publishing, Inc. et al v. Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.July 13, 2007October 29, 2007
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. unlawfully distributed or reproduced plaintiffs' copyrighted works when it sold special devices marketed as Sirius Satellite Radio players (i.e., Sirius S50, Stiletto SL100 and Stiletto S10) which allowed subscribers to record and retain perfect digital copies of plaintiffs' protected works, as well as store them for unlimited replay as long as they remained active Sirius subscribers.
Lulu Enterprises, Inc. v. N-F Newsite, LLC et alSeptember 5, 2007October 24, 2007
Plaintiff Lulu Enterprises, Inc. complains that defendants' HULU mark and domain name unfairly trade upon the goodwill that Lulu has established in its LULU name and marks.
George Edward McCain v. Associated Press TheAugust 31, 2007October 23, 2007
FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. FragranceX.com Inc.May 12, 2006October 23, 2007
Plaintiff FragranceNet.com, Inc. alleges that defendant FragranceX.com Inc. took, misappropriated and copied more than 800 photographs from plaintiff's website without permission or compensation for use on a competing online retail store.
REFINED RECOMMENDATION CORPORATION v. NETFLIX, INC.October 16, 2007October 22, 2007
Plaintiff Refined Recommendation Corporation alleges that Netflix, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,606,102 entitled "Optimizing Interest Potential."
RICHES v. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES INC. et alOctober 15, 2007October 15, 2007
SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al v. Dudas et alOctober 9, 2007October 15, 2007
Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Hustler.com et alOctober 5, 2007October 15, 2007
Plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC alleged that defendants Hustler.com (a/k/a LFP Internet Group, LLC), LFP, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Apple Inc., Playboy Enterprises, Inc., Audible, Inc., Sony Corp. of America, Sony Connect, Inc., Macrovision Corp. and Blockbuster Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,389,541 entitled "Regulating Access to Digital Content."
Leaper Footwear v. Nike et alOctober 1, 2007October 15, 2007
Plaintiff Leaper Footwear, LLC alleged that defendants Nike, Inc. and Apple, Inc. developed and marketed a "Nike + iPod Sport Kit" that infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,720,200 entitled "Performance Measuring Footwear."
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et alJune 20, 2007October 15, 2007
Plaintiff alleges that defendants have infringed US Patent No. 6,712,702 covering a method and system for playing games on a network.
Web Telephony, LLC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et alMarch 14, 2007October 15, 2007
Plaintiff Web Telephony, LLC alleges that defendants have infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,445,694 and 6,785,266, both entitled "Internet controlled telephone system."
Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche LTD et alNovember 8, 2005October 15, 2007
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et alOctober 14, 2005October 15, 2007
Plaintiff Stanford University alleged that defendants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. and Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,968,730 entitled "Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Monitoring Antiviral Therapy and Making Therapeutic Decisions in the Treatment of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome" and 6,503,705 entitled "Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Monitoring Antiviral Therapy and Making Therapeutic Decisions in the Treatment of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome."
PartsRiver, Inc. v. Shopzilla, Inc. et alOctober 3, 2007October 12, 2007
Plaintiff PartsRiver, Inc. alleged that defendants Shopzilla, Inc., ValueClick, Inc., Pricerunner Limited, Yahoo! Inc., PriceGrabber.com, Inc., eBay, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,275,821 entitled "Method and System for Executing a Guided Parametric Search."
NTP, Inc. v. Sprint Nextel Corp.September 7, 2007October 12, 2007
Plaintiff NTP, Inc. alleged that Sprint Nextel Corp. infringed on U.S Patent Nos. 5,438,611 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors Originating from Outside of the Electronic Mail System and Method of Operation thereof," 5,479,472 entitled "System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems by RF Communications and Method of Operation thereof," 5,436,960 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors and Method of Operation thereof," 5,625,670 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 5,819,172 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Radios," 6,317,582 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," and 6,317,592 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processor," and 5,631,946 entitled "System for Transferring Information from a RF Receiver to a Processor Under Control of a Program Store by the Processor and Method of Operation thereof".
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et alJuly 31, 2006October 12, 2007
Plaintiff Anascape, Ltd. sued defendants Microsoft Corp. and Nintendo of America, Inc., and alleged that defendants infringed on various patents related to video game consoles and video game controllers.
Apple Computer Inc. v. Burst.com, Inc.January 4, 2006October 12, 2007
Plaintiff Apple Computer, Inc. sued defendant Burst.com, Inc. and sought a declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 4,963,995 entitled "Audio/Video Transceiver Apparatus Including Compression Means," 5,164,839 entitled "Method for handling audio/video source information", 5,995,705 entitled "Burst transmission apparatus and method for audio/video information" are invalid and are not infringed by Apple.
IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. Red Hat Inc. et alOctober 9, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiff IP Innovation LLC and Technology Licensing Corporation alleged that defendants Red Hat Inc. and Novell Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,072,412 entitled "User Interface With Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects," 5,533,183 entitled "User Interface With Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects," and 5,394,521 entitled "User Interface With Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects."
NTP, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipSeptember 7, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiff NTP, Inc. alleged that defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,436,960 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors and Method of Operation thereof," 5,438,611 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors Originating from Outside of the Electronic Mail System and Method of Operation thereof," 5,625,670 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 5,819,172 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Radios," 6,067,451 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 6,317,592 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processor," 5,479,472 entitled "System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems by RF Communications and Method of Operation thereof," and 5,631,946 entitled "System for Transferring Information from a RF Receiver to a Processor Under Control of a Program Store by the Processor and Method of Operation thereof".
Mediostream, Inc. v. Acer America Corporation et alAugust 28, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiff MedioStream, Inc. alleges that defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655 B2 entitled "Method and System for Direct Recording of Video Information onto a Disk Medium."
The Procter & Gamble Company v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.August 27, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiff Procter & Gamble Company sued defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc. for infringing US Patent No. 7,169,418 entitled "Packaging system to provide fresh packed cofee."
Word Music, LLC et al v. Priddis Music, Inc. et alMay 8, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiffs own or administer copyrights to original musical compositions. They alleged that defendants have infringed on plaintiffs' copyrights by producing, distributing, advertising and placing upon the market karaoke products which contain unauthorized recordings of the songs and graphic display of the lyrics.
William Reber, L.L.C. v. Helio L.L.C.April 30, 2007October 11, 2007
Plaintiff William Reber L.L.C alleges that Defendant Helio L.L.C. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,701,258 entitled "Wireless Pager with Prestored Images and Methods and Systems for Use thereof."
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc et al v. Electronic Arts IncDecember 1, 2006October 11, 2007
Plaintiffs Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., Textron Innovations Inc. and Textron Inc. alleged that defendant Electronic Arts, Inc. engaged in trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, dilution, unfair competition and misappropriation by manufacturing software and video games (including Battlefield Vietnam, Battlefield Vietnam: Redux, and Battlefield 2) that prominently feature, utilize and depict plaintiffs' trademarks, and trade dress without plaintiffs' permission or approval.
1st Technology LLC v. Rational Enterprises Ltda. et alSeptember 7, 2006October 11, 2007
Plaintiff 1st Technology LLC alleged that defendants Rational Enterprises Ltda., Rational Poker School Limited, Bodog Entertainment Group S.A., Bodog.net, Bodog.com and FutureBet Systems Ltd. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,564,001 entitled "Method and System for Interactively Transmitting Multimedia Information Over a Network Which Requires Reduced Bandwidth."
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et alOctober 4, 2005October 11, 2007
Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P. alleged that theglobe.com, Inc., Voiceglo Holdings, Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,304,572 entitled "Method, System and Apparatus for Telecommunications Control," 6,663,561 entitled "Method, System and Apparatus for Telecommunications Control," 6,463,052 entitled "Method, System and Apparatus for Telecommunications Control," 6,452,932 entitled "Method, System and Apparatus for Telecommunications Control," 6,473,429 entitled "Broadband Telecommunications System," 6,298,064 entitled "Broadband Telecommunications System," and 6,665,294 entitled "Broadband Telecommunications System."
Andersen et al v. Monsoon Multimedia, Inc.September 19, 2007October 10, 2007
NTP, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.September 7, 2007October 10, 2007
Plaintiff NTP, Inc. alleged that T-Mobile USA, Inc. infringed on U.S Patent Nos. 5,438,611 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors Originating from Outside of the Electronic Mail System and Method of Operation thereof," 5,479,472 entitled "System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems by RF Communications and Method of Operation thereof," 5,436,960 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors and Method of Operation thereof," 5,625,670 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 5,819,172 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Radios," 6,317,582 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," and 6,317,592 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processor," and 5,631,946 entitled "System for Transferring Information from a RF Receiver to a Processor Under Control of a Program Store by the Processor and Method of Operation thereof".
Pravda Studios, LLC v. Corbis Corporation et alSeptember 6, 2007October 10, 2007
Plaintiff Pravda Studios, LLC alleged that defendants Corbis Corporation and Corbis Motion engaged in copyright infringement by copying , displaying and distributing plaintiff's live action, motion picture, film footage entitled PRAVDA B-STOCK: SPAIN. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant negligently lost, misplaced, destroyed or improperly converted plaintiff's work.
Mattel, Inc. v. Global China Networks, LLC. et alAugust 21, 2007October 10, 2007
Defendants operate a pornographic web site at www.chinabarbie.com. Plaintiff owns the BARBIE trademark and alleges that chinabarbie infringes and is confusingly similar and dilutive of the BARBIE trademark.
Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Nortel Networks Inc. et alAugust 17, 2007October 10, 2007
Plaintiff Vonage Holdings Corp. sought a declaratory judgment that defendant's patents are invalid, void and/or unenforceable. The case involved U.S. Patent Nos. 6,091,808 entitled "Methods of an Apparatus for Providing Telephone Call Control and Information," 6,445,695 entitled "System and Method for Supporting Communications Services on Behalf of a Communications Device Which Cannot Provide Those Services Itself," and 7,050,861 entitled "Controlling a Destination Terminal from an Originating Terminal."
Pape v. Electronic Arts, Inc. et alJune 18, 2007October 10, 2007
Plaintiff Christopher Pape alleged that defendants Electronic Arts, Inc. and Inetvideo.com infringed on plaintiff's copyright in a painting entitled "Freedom" by including it in the electronic video game called Freedom Fighters.
Wolf v. Brightroom, Inc. et alJune 8, 2007October 10, 2007
Plaintiff alleged that defendants Brightroom, Inc., Island Photography, Inc., Elizabeth M. Kreutz, Bird's Eye View, Inc., Digilabs, Inc., Printroom, INc., Smugmug, Inc. and Hour Photos, Inc. d/b/a Master Photos U.S.A. infringed on U.S Patent No. 7,047,214 entitled "Process for Providing Event Photographs for Inspection, Selection and Distribution Via a Computer Network."
Sweet People Apparel Inc v. Forever 21 IncFebruary 23, 2007October 10, 2007
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLCNovember 9, 2005October 10, 2007
Plaintiff AdvanceMe Inc. alleges that defendant RapidPay LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,941,281 entitled "Automated Payment." The patent covers systems and methods of automated loan repayment.
NTP, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLCSeptember 7, 2007October 9, 2007
Plaintiff NTP, Inc. alleged that AT&T Mobility, LLC infringed on U.S Patent Nos. 5,438,611 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors Originating from Outside of the Electronic Mail System and Method of Operation thereof," 5,479,472 entitled "System for Interconnecting Electronic Mail Systems by RF Communications and Method of Operation thereof," 5,436,960 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors and Method of Operation thereof," 5,625,670 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," 5,819,172 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Radios," 6,317,582 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processors," and 6,317,592 entitled "Electronic Mail System with RF Communications to Mobile Processor," and 5,631,946 entitled "System for Transferring Information from a RF Receiver to a Processor Under Control of a Program Store by the Processor and Method of Operation thereof".
FotoMedia Technologies, LLC v. AOL, LLC. et alJune 18, 2007October 9, 2007
Plaintiff FotoMedia Technologies, LLC alleged that AOL LLC, American Online, Inc., PhotoBucket.com, Inc., Shutterfly, Inc., CNET Networks, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,018,774 entitled "Method and System for Creating Messages Including Image Information," 6,542,936 B1 entitled "System for Creating Messages Including Image Information," and 6,871,231 B2 entitled "Role-Based Access to Image Metadata."
segOne, Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting CompanyJune 12, 2007October 9, 2007
Plaintiff segOne, Inc. seeks a declaration that use of the segOne device, in conjunction with Fox programming, does not infringe Defendant Fox Broadcasting Company's copyrights.
MARS, INC. v. NATRACEUTICAL, S.A. et alApril 3, 2007October 9, 2007
Mars, Inc. alleges that Natraceutical, S.A. and Natra U.S., Inc. infringed certain patents held by Mars concerning the production of cocoa with enriched polyphenol content, which purportedly conveys vascular health benefits to consumers of chocolate.
Diane Von Furstenberg Studio, LP v. Forever 21, Inc. et alMarch 23, 2007October 9, 2007
Diane Von Furstenburg Studio alleges that forever 21 produced, marketed, advertised, distributed, offered for sale and sold dresses nearly identical to Diane Von Furstenburg's Cerisier and Aubrey dresses that bear designs identical to Diane Von Furstenburg copyrights.
Tavory v. NTP, Inc.September 20, 2006October 9, 2007
Plaintiff Oren Tavory sued defendant NTP, Inc., seeking to be joined as an inventor to six patents owned by NTP, as well as damages for copyright infringement and unjust enrichment.
1st Technology LLC v. IQ-Ludorum, PLC, et alMarch 15, 2006October 9, 2007
JTH Tax, Inc. v. WhitakerApril 12, 2007October 5, 2007
Plaintiff JTH Tax, Inc. alleges that the defendant breached a franchise agreement by failing to follow operating procedures, refused to allow the franchisor to inspect the business and refused to follow certain post-termination obligations.
DOW JONES REUTERS BUSINESS INTERACTIVE, LLC v. ABLAISE LTD. et alJune 1, 2006October 5, 2007
Plaintiff Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive, LLC d/b/a Factiva seeks a declaratory judgment against defendants Ablaise Ltd. and General Investions Institute A, Inc. that plaintiff has not infringed any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,961,737 patent entitled "Serving Signals" and that the 6,961,737 patent is invalid.
S & L Vitamins, Inc. v. Australian Gold, Inc.March 4, 2005October 5, 2007
Plaintiff S & L Vitamins, Inc. seeks a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of trademark rights and non-interference with contract and for unfair competition. Plaintiff sells tanning products on its website SuppleNet.com that are manufactured by defendant Australian Gold, Inc.
HANESBRANDS, INC. et al v. AMERICAN APPAREL, INC. et alSeptember 4, 2007October 3, 2007
Plaintiffs Hanesbrands, Inc., HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises, LLC and HBI Branded Apparel Limited, Inc. alleged that defendants American Apparel, Inc. and American Apparel Retail, Inc. infringed on the BARELY THERE marks used by plaintiff on women's hosiery, lingerie and apparel products.
Selex Communications, Inc. v. Jajah, Inc.April 12, 2007October 3, 2007
Alfenas v. Pantera Partnership et alAugust 2, 2007October 2, 2007
Plaintiff Leif Alfenas alleges that defendant Pantera Partnership acquiesced to his publication of a non-commercial fan appreciation website at Pantera.com and that defendant had abandoned its rights to the trademark PANTERA.
United Fabrics International Inc v. Forever 21 Inc et alFebruary 2, 2007October 2, 2007
Riches v. Gates et alSeptember 21, 2007October 1, 2007
Video Professor, Inc. v. John Does 1-100August 16, 2007September 28, 2007
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et alFebruary 24, 2006September 28, 2007
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Knyane et alSeptember 21, 2007September 27, 2007
Plaintiffs Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cengage Learning, Inc. and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. alleged that defendants infringed on plaintiffs' copyrights and trademarks through their sales of electronic copies of instructors' solutions manuals.
Riches v. UnderwoodSeptember 14, 2007September 27, 2007
Riches v. UnderwoodSeptember 21, 2007September 26, 2007
Plaintiff Jonathan Lee Riches© d/b/a CEO of "Identity Theft Row Records" sued defendant Carrie Underwood d/b/a "Country Music Singer." Plaintiff alleged that defendant bribed American Idol judges Simon and Paula, and got plaintiff's co-defendant to hack into phone lines to rig votes. He also alleges that defendant's current hit songs—"I Sued Vick, Got on the News Quick," "All Truth in My Lawsuits," and "Jonathan Lee Riches, He Delicious"—are plaintiff's copyrighted material. He also alleged that two Milli Vanilli lookalikes jumped him in the prison rec yard and stole his larynx on defendant's direct orders. (Plaintiff also affixed two stamps on the complaint—which did not reproduce clearly—and labeled them stamps of approval).
Mediostream Inc. v. Priddis Music Inc. et alApril 17, 2007September 25, 2007
Plaintiff Mediostream, Inc. alleged that it had entered into an agreement with defendant Priddis Music, Inc. under which defendant purported to grant plaintiff a non-exclusive right to encode, host, integrate and make available tracks for plaintiff's online karaoke business. Plaintiff further alleged that defendant Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. subsequently contacted plaintiff, asserted that plaintiff had infringed upon its copyrights, and indicated that defendant Priddis Music had no rights to transfer to plaintiff.
Nike, Inc. v. Geox USA, Inc. et alJuly 19, 2007September 24, 2007
Harajuku Lovers LLC v. Forever 21 Inc et alJune 14, 2007September 24, 2007
MCS Music America, Inc. et al v. Farner et alApril 6, 2007September 21, 2007
Ritchie v. GanoAugust 15, 2007September 20, 2007
Plaintiff Brian Ritchie d/b/a Violent Femmes seeks a declaratory judgment that plaintiff is a joint-author of the certain Violent Femmes musical compositions and recordings, and is the sole and exclusive owner of the VIOLENT FEMMES trademark.
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Forever 21, Inc. et alMay 15, 2007September 20, 2007
Splash News & Picture Agency Inc et al v. Lavandeira et alApril 23, 2007September 20, 2007
Omega, S.A. et al v. Susan Eisen, Inc.August 1, 2007September 18, 2007
St. Louis Cardinals, LLC v. LewisMarch 9, 2007September 18, 2007
Plaintiff St. Louis Cardinals, LLC complains that defendant Douglas J. Lewis d/b/a STL Products operates a retail business that sells and offers for sale a wide variety of merchandise bearing trademarks, designations, logos and designs identical and/or confusingly similar to plaintiff's CARDINALS marks.
THE SCO GROUP, INC. v. AUTOZONE, INC.March 3, 2004September 17, 2007
SCO Grp v. Novell IncFebruary 6, 2004September 14, 2007
Video Professor, Inc. v. McGrathJuly 13, 2007September 13, 2007
High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. B A Barker IncJune 8, 2007September 13, 2007
Siddharth Kara v. Lions Gate Entertainment Inc et alFebruary 5, 2007September 13, 2007
Paris Hilton v. Hallmark Cards et alSeptember 6, 2007September 12, 2007
CKE Restaurants Inc et al v. Jack in the Box IncMay 25, 2007September 12, 2007
Carl's Jr. sued Jack in the Box over TV ads that Jack in the Box ran that suggested Angus beef came from the butt of a cow.
1st Media LLC v. Napster, Inc. et alJanuary 16, 2007September 12, 2007
Plaintiff 1st Media LLC alleges that Defendants Napster, Inc., RealNetworks,Inc., kSolo, Inc., and Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation d/b/a Sound Choice Accompaniment Tracks infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,464,946 entitled "System and Apparatus for Interactive Multimedia Entertainment."
Reiber et al v. Western Digital Corp. et alSeptember 10, 2007September 11, 2007
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Chocolate Perfection, Inc. et alJuly 31, 2007September 11, 2007
Knight v. LaVandeiraMay 11, 2007September 11, 2007
Photographer Ken Knight alleges that Mario Lavandeira posted a photo of Jason Allen Alexander on the website www.perezhilton.com. Plaintiff asserts that he holds the copyright to the photo and that it was published on the website without permission.
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Associazione Italiana Sommelier Roma et alNovember 4, 2005September 11, 2007
Riches v. 50 CentSeptember 10, 2007September 10, 2007
Plaintiff Jonathan Lee Riches alleges that defendant Curtis Jackson a/k/a 50 cent will be releasing a new album entitled "Curtis," which contains numerous Jonathan Lee Riches copyrighted lyrics and material. Plaintiff alleges that a lot of the lyrics deal with cybercrime, and that defendant stole the following copyrighted material from him.
Lycos, Inc. v. Tivo, Inc. et alAugust 9, 2007September 10, 2007
Plaintiff Lycos, Inc. alleges that defendants Tivo, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and Blockbuster, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,867,799 entitled "Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs: and 5,983,214 entitled "System and method employing individual user content-based data and user collaborative feedback data to evaluate the content of an information entity in a large information communication network."
Datatreasury Corporation v. Small Value Payments CompanyMarch 2, 2004September 10, 2007
CNG Financial Corporation v. Google IncJanuary 24, 2006September 7, 2007
Plaintiff CNG Financial Corporation sued Defendant Google, Inc. over Google's practice of allowing third parties to purchase online advertisements that appear when a user searches for "Check 'N Go" on Google's website. Plaintiff owns the service mark "Check 'N Go."
CafePress.com, Inc. v. ArtsCafe.com et alAugust 29, 2007September 6, 2007
High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Innovative Spotlight IncJune 8, 2007September 5, 2007
Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch, LLC alleged that defendant Innovative Spotlight, Inc. infringed on U.S Patent Nos. D475,163, D468,491 and D475,162, entitled "Dog collar."
Sanrio, Inc et al v. Elia Oleta et alMay 24, 2007September 5, 2007
Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences v. Ampas.comApril 13, 2007September 5, 2007
Plaintiff Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences seeks an order transferring the domain name ampas.com to the plaintiff or deleting the registration of the domain name ampas.com
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.November 26, 2003September 5, 2007
Plaintiff Google Inc. seeks declaratory judgment that its policy regarding the sale of keyword-triggering advertising does not constitute trademark infringement.
AdvanceMe Inc v. AMERIMERCHANT LLCFebruary 27, 2006August 31, 2007
Plaintiff AdvanceMe Inc. alleges that defendant AmeriMerchant, LLC infringed on US Patent No. 6,941,281 entitled "Automatic payment."
Yellowone Investments v. Verizon Communications, Inc et alNovember 15, 2006August 30, 2007
Plaintiff alleges that Verizon's city pages and superpages websites violated its patent covering location-based search.
Powerful Katinka, Inc. v. McFarland et alJune 26, 2007August 29, 2007
Chef Rebecca Charles of the Pearl Oyster Bar alleges that her former employee Chef Edward McFarland opened Ed's Lobster Bar, a restaurant that pirated Pearl's entire menu, copied all aspects of Pearl's presentation of its dishes and duplicated Pearl's readily identifiable decor.
Sanrio Inc et al v. El Sol Trading et alJune 4, 2007August 29, 2007
Levi Strauss & Co v. Polo Ralph Lauren CorporationJuly 12, 2007August 28, 2007
North American Karaoke-Works Trade Association, Inc. v. Entral Group International, LLCJuly 6, 2006August 27, 2007
Coast To Coast Fabrics, Inc. v. Forever 21, Inc.April 26, 2007August 24, 2007
High Maintenance Bitch LLC v. Uptown Dog Club IncJune 8, 2007August 22, 2007
Plaintiff High Maintenance Bitch, LLC alleged that defendant Uptown Dog Club, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. D475,163 and D468,491 and D475,162.
L. F. P. Inc et al v. Cafepress.com, Inc et alJuly 6, 2007August 21, 2007
Solengo Capital Advisors ULC v. Dealbreaker et alApril 2, 2007August 21, 2007
M M P Inc v. Forever 21 Inc et alJanuary 30, 2007August 20, 2007
MCCLATCHEY v. ASSOCIATED PRESSFebruary 24, 2005August 17, 2007
Plaintiff Valencia McClatchey alleged that defendant the Associated Press (AP) over the AP's unauthorized use of her copyright End of Serenity photograph.
Dunbar et al v. Gottwald et alMay 25, 2007August 15, 2007
Datatreasury Corporation v. City National Corporation et alApril 18, 2006August 14, 2007
bebe stores, inc. et al v. forever 21 Inc et alJanuary 4, 2007August 13, 2007
bebe alleges that forever 21 sold garments bearing designs that were identical or virtually identical to bebe's copyrighted designs.
Anna Sui Corp. v. Forever 21, Inc. et alApril 23, 2007August 7, 2007
Anna Sui Corp. alleges that Forever 21 sold and offered for sale numerous women's clothing items bearing a striking similarity to Sui Products featured at the most recent New York Fashion Week shows.
Pantera Partnership v. AlfenasAugust 3, 2007August 3, 2007
Plaintiff Pantera Partnership alleged that defendant Leif Alfenas operated, maintained and registered the pantera.com website with plaintiff's consent as an independent contractor. Plaintiff further alleged that it subsequently determined that it was in its best interest to regain control of its official website and demanded that defendant deliver pantera.com to plaintiff.
Counter Terrorist Group US et al v. Associated Press et alJuly 9, 2007July 30, 2007
Perfect 10 Inc v. Amazon.com Inc et alJune 29, 2005July 25, 2007
Plaintiff Perfect 10 sued defendant Amazon.com Inc. for displaying thumbnails of photographs copyrighted by the plaintiff. Consolidated with Perfect 10 Inc. v. Google Inc. et al.
MY FIRST BIKE PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. MYSPACE, INC. et alApril 13, 2007July 23, 2007
Exact-Science Productions, LLC v. Femme Knits Inc. et alApril 27, 2007July 20, 2007
Exact-Science Products alleges that Femme Knits manufactured, imported, offered for sale and sold garments being a copyrighted design of visual art entitled "Heart Shaped Cassette Tape / I Love Music."
Revenue Science, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc. et alMay 23, 2007July 18, 2007
TiVo, Inc. v. Forgent Networks, Inc.May 17, 2007July 18, 2007
Cal IV Entertainment, LLC v. Youtube, Inc. et alJune 7, 2007July 10, 2007
Plaintiff, a music publishing company, alleges that Defendants infringed its copyrights by allowing users to upload videos containing plaintiff's copyrighted works and providing access to certain content filtering technologies only to existing business partners.
The Freecycle Network, Inc. v. Oey et alApril 4, 2006July 10, 2007
Plaintiff The Freecycle Network, Inc. alleges that defendants Tim Oey and Jane Doe Oey have been knowingly inducing third parties to infringe The Freecycle Networks's marks by encouraging others to use the term freecycle as a generic term.
Google Inc. v. WolfeApril 8, 2005July 9, 2007
Plaintiff Google, Inc. alleges that defendant Richard Wolfe infringed on its trademark by registering the domain name froogles.com and hosting a internet shopping guide at that site, which competes with Google's web search services.
JTH Tax, Inc. v. VanMarch 28, 2007July 5, 2007
Reebok International Ltd. v. Nike, Inc.April 3, 2007July 2, 2007
Entral Group International, LLC v. Legend Cafe & Karaoke, Inc. et alMay 11, 2005June 27, 2007
Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc.April 4, 2006June 26, 2007
Freeplay Music Corp. v. Haas Outdoors, Inc. et alSeptember 21, 2006June 22, 2007
Unicolors Inc v. Forever 21 Inc et alJune 1, 2007June 14, 2007
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Sasha Stone et alMay 1, 2007June 13, 2007
IP Innovation LLC. et al v. Apple, Inc.April 18, 2007June 13, 2007
Plaintiffs IP Innovation LLC and Technology Licensing Corporation allege that Defendant Apple Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,072,412 entitled "User Interface with Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects."
1st Technology LLC v. Riptown.Com MediaDecember 28, 2006June 13, 2007
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. DEREK & JAMAR PRODUCTION, LLCNovember 21, 2006June 13, 2007
Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. Keyhole, Inc et alJune 5, 2006June 11, 2007
Plaintiff Skyline Software Systems, Inc. sued defendant Keyhole, Inc. for patent infringement. Plaintiff alleges that Google Earth and other products provided by defendants infringe on U.S. Patent No. 6,496,189 entitled "Remote landscape display and pilot training."
CafePress.com Inc v. Alexa Internet Inc et alApril 16, 2007June 8, 2007
Video Professor, Inc. v. MalakerApril 4, 2007June 7, 2007
Plaintiff Video Professor, Inc. alleged that defendant registered videoprofessor.ca, which is confusingly similar to the VIDEO PROFESSOR trademark.
Compression Labs Inc. v. Creo Inc. et alApril 19, 2005June 5, 2007
Yahoo Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc. et alMarch 25, 2005June 5, 2007
Google Inc. v. Compression Labs Inc et alSeptember 17, 2004June 5, 2007
Plaintiff Google Inc. filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent No. 4,698,672 entitled "Coding system for reducing redundancy" owned by defendants Compression Labs, Inc., Forgent Networks, Inc. and General Instruments Corporation is invalid. Defendants have alleged that their patent covers the international standard adopted by the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) for compression, decompression, transmission and storage of digital still images.
Universal City Studios Productions LLLP v. Mario Lavandeira et alFebruary 20, 2007June 4, 2007
Internet Archive v. ShellAugust 31, 2006May 29, 2007
Copyright infringement claim
Grisman et al v. YouTube, Inc. et alMay 10, 2007May 25, 2007
Plaintiffs, owners of Dawg Music, allege that Defendants infringed on plaintiff's protected works and refused to deter infringing activities.
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY v. YOUTUBE, INC. et alMay 22, 2007May 24, 2007
Plaintiff New Jersey Turnpike Authority captured a car accident on video that occurred at the Great Egg Harbor toll plaza in Somers Point, New Jersey. Plaintiff asserts that the video is the copyright property of the NJTA and has filed an application with the US Copyright Office to obtain federally registered copyrights for the accident video. This video was subsequently uploaded to YouTube.com, LiveLeak.com and Break.com.
Stainbrook v. Lions Gate Entertainment et alDecember 1, 2006May 23, 2007
Plaintiff Jon Stainbrook alleges that Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment and Palm Pictures used the song FLASHING REDS in the film STOKED without permission.
Adam Pick v. Fremantlemedia North America Inc et alJanuary 31, 2007May 17, 2007
Plaintiff Adam Pick alleged that Defendants Fremantlemedia North America, Inc., American Idol Productions, Inc. and Fox Television Stations, Inc. incorporated his ideas on improving the American Idol website without paying him for it.
Site Pro-1, Inc. v. Better Metal, LLCDecember 6, 2006May 14, 2007
Plaintiff Site Pro-1, Inc. alleges that Defendant Better Metal, LLC placed SitePro1's SITE PRO 1 trademark in the metadata and/or meta tags of its www.bettermetal.com web site and/or improperly included SitePro1's SITE PRO 1 trademark in a search engine algorithm utilized by the Yahoo! search engine.
Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc.December 19, 2006April 24, 2007
Plaintiff Helio LLC alleged that Defendant Palm, Inc. use the slogan "Not Just a Cell Phone" that is confusingly similar to Plaintiff's "Don't Call It a Phone" trademark, slogan and brand.
MoveOn.org Civic Action et al v. Viacom International Inc.March 21, 2007April 23, 2007
MoveOn.org and Brave New Films sued Viacom for asking YouTube to remove a video containing some Viacom content.
Connor Sport Court International, Inc. v. Rhino Sports, Inc., et alDecember 21, 2006April 18, 2007
Verizon Services Corp. et al v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et alJune 12, 2006April 18, 2007
The Cartoon Network LP. LLLP et al v. CSC Holdings, Inc. et alMay 26, 2006April 18, 2007
Plaintiffs The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP and Cable News Network LP alleged that Defendants CSC Holdings, Inc. and Cablevision Systems Corporation infringed on its copyrights by copying and storing programming on its servers and transmitting that programming to its subscribers on demand.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. v. Earthlink Legal DepartmentApril 12, 2007April 17, 2007
Fulbright & Jaworski LLP issued a subpoena seeking the identity of the individual or individuals who posted copyrighted questions from the July 2006 Multistate Bar Examination on www.tabandbrandy.blogspot.com.
AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE v. GOOGLE INC.March 17, 2005April 6, 2007
Plaintiff alleges that Google's aggregation of AFP's photographs, headlines and story leads in Google News infringes on Plaintiff's copyrights.
Timebase Pty Ltd. v. The Thomson CorporationJanuary 24, 2007April 5, 2007
Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC v. Datatreasury CorporationSeptember 29, 2005April 4, 2007
Shloss v. JoyceJanuary 25, 2007March 29, 2007
Case consolidated with Schloss v. Sweeney et al.
A.V. et al v. iParadigms, LLCMarch 27, 2007March 28, 2007
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION v. S.F. ADVISORS, LLC et alNovember 28, 2006March 19, 2007
NETALOG, INC. v. SANRIO CO., LTD., et alJune 1, 2006March 15, 2007
Anthropologie, Inc. et al v. Forever 21, Inc.March 30, 2006March 1, 2007
MGA Entertainment Inc v. Mattel Inc et alApril 13, 2005February 22, 2007
Rescuecom Corporation v. Google, Inc.September 7, 2004February 13, 2007
Plaintiff Rescuecom Corporation alleges that defendant Google, Inc. improperly infringes on plaintiff's name and trademark by selling the trademark to plaintiff's competitors as a keyword in defendant's search results.
Zazzle.com, Inc. v. Abbie Road Imprinting, LLCDecember 5, 2006January 25, 2007
Hawaii-Pacific Apparel Group, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Company, LLC et alOctober 4, 2004December 27, 2006
Plaintiff Hawaii-Pacific Apparel Group, Inc. alleged that defendants Cleveland Browns Football Company LLC and National Football League Properties, Inc. infringed on plaintiff's trademarks LIL DAWG POUND and DAWG Pound.
Johnson v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. et alAugust 3, 2006December 19, 2006
Plaintiff Theodore Johnson alleged that Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and Black Entertainment Television, Inc. infringed on Plaintiff's copyright to the artwork BLACK ANGEL by displaying and distributing it to the public in scenes of a motion picture entitled CAUGHT UP.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al v. Google Inc.October 19, 2005November 22, 2006
Plaintiffs allege that the Google Library Project infringes on plaintiffs' copyrights by copying copyright-protected works and allowing the public to search and access digital copies of plaintiffs' works.
Allball Athletics, LLC v. NBA Properties, Inc. et alNovember 28, 2005September 18, 2006
CollegeNET, Inc. v. A.C.N., Inc.May 8, 2006September 1, 2006
Freeplay Music Corp v. Vivid Entertainment Group et alJune 5, 2006August 17, 2006
Jews for Jesus v. Google, Inc.December 21, 2005July 27, 2006
Plaintiff Jews for Jesus sued defendant Google, Inc. for creating a jewsforjesus third-level sub-domain within its blogspot.com domain. Plaintiff alleges the the Google-hosted Jews for Jesus blog authored by an anonymous third-party violated plaintiff's rights to the Jews for Jesus trademark.
AUSTRALIAN GOLD, INC. v. HALLJanuary 17, 2006July 26, 2006
Plaintiff Australian Gold, Inc. alleged that defendant sells Australian Gold, Caribbean Gold and Swedish Beauty tanning lotions and other tanning related products on eBay using Australian Gold's intellectual property, including its copyrights and trademarks. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant's conduct has damaged plaintiff's distribution system and the reputation and goodwill of the products and the company.
SS&C Technologies, Inc. v. Reuters America L.L.C. et alJanuary 10, 2006July 26, 2006
Immunocept, LLC, et al v. Fulbright & JaworskiMay 6, 2005July 26, 2006
Square Enix Company Ltd v. Xanga.com Inc et alJanuary 18, 2006July 19, 2006
AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY v. GOOGLE, INC.December 9, 2004July 5, 2006
Plaintiff American Chemical Society alleges that defendant Google, Inc.'s a new research tool directed to scientists under the trademark SCHOLAR infringes on plaintiff's federally registered trademark SCIFINDER SCHOLAR and its common-law SCHOLAR mark.
Internet Archive v. ShellJanuary 20, 2006May 17, 2006
Texas A&M University v. Seattle Seahawks Inc et alFebruary 2, 2006May 8, 2006
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Props for Today, Inc. et alFebruary 27, 2006April 27, 2006
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.November 22, 2005March 24, 2006
NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC. et al v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.November 15, 2005March 23, 2006
Marcel Fashion Group v. Cafepress.Com, Inc.January 17, 2006March 14, 2006
Blake A. Field VS Google, Inc.,April 6, 2004February 22, 2006
Plaintiff Blake A. Field sued defendant Google, Inc. for copyright infringement. Plaintiff posted his copyrighted works on his website and completed an online form to request that Google index his website. Plaintiff now asserts that allowing users to view Google's cache of his copyrighted works infringes on his copyrights.
Ideaflood Inc v. About Inc et alMay 13, 2005February 6, 2006
Google, Inc. v. Affinity Engines, Inc.February 9, 2005January 20, 2006
Plaintiff Google Inc. alleges that defendant Affinity Engines Inc. infringed on plaintiff's copyrights by using software code owned by Google that implements social networking functionalities and was written by Orkut Buyukkokten, a Google employee.
Macellari v. Carroll et alAugust 31, 2005January 12, 2006
1st Technology LLC VS Sportingbet PLC., etalJune 27, 2005January 11, 2006
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Club Jenna, Inc. et alDecember 21, 2005January 10, 2006
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc et al v. Forgent Networks, Inc.September 19, 2005November 9, 2005
Perfect 10 Inc v. Arlo GilbertNovember 3, 2004October 17, 2005
Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. alleges that Defendant Arlo Gilbert copied Plaintiff's copyrighted works and offered them for sale on his websites without authorization.
CitiGroup, Inc. et al v. Datatreasury CorporationSeptember 2, 2005September 29, 2005
Five Navy Seals, et al v. Associated Press, et alMarch 21, 2005September 1, 2005
Plaintiffs allege that defendant Seth Hettena, a reporter for defendant Associated Press, took photographs from plaintiff's personal digital photo album at smugmug.com without permission. Plaintiffs further allege that defendants published some of these photos, which depicted five Navy SEALs, without concealing the identities of the servicemen.
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service Association et alJanuary 28, 2004August 12, 2005
Government Employees, et al v. Google, Inc., et alMay 4, 2004August 8, 2005
Plaintiff GEICO sued defendant Google, Inc. claiming that defendant violated the Lanham Act and engaged in unfair competition by using GEICO's trademarks to sell advertising on its Internet search engine.
Ideaflood, Inc v. America's Online, et alJanuary 23, 2004July 27, 2005
EMI April Music, Inc. et al v. Electronic Arts, Inc.April 21, 2004June 30, 2005
Plaintiffs EMI April Music Inc., EMI Blackwood Music Inc., EMI Unart Catalog Inc. and EMI Virgin Songs, Inc. alleged that defendant Electronic Arts Inc. infringed on plaintiffs' rights in numerous musical compositions by incorporating them in EA Madden 2004, EA NHL 2004, EA NASCAR Thunder 2004, EA Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2004, EA NBA Live 2004, EA MVP Baseball 2004 and EA Fight Night 2004.
Compression Labs, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationApril 21, 2005June 29, 2005
Ideaflood, Inc. v. Google, Inc.October 4, 2004March 21, 2005
Plaintiff Ideaflood, Inc. sued defendant Google, Inc. and alleged that Google's blogging service infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,687,746 B1 entitled "System apparatus and method for hosting and assigning domain names on a wide area network." Plaintiff alleged that the patent covers a service for hosting domains and assigning domain names to users, were the domain name is defined, in part, by the user.
Compression Labs Incorporated v. Dell, Inc et alApril 23, 2004February 28, 2005
Plaintiff Compression Labs, Incorporated alleged that Dell Incorporated, International Business Machines Corporation and Toshiba America, Incorporated infringed on U.S. Patent No. 4,698,672 entitled "Coding System for Reducing Redunancy."
Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et alApril 22, 2004February 28, 2005
Plaintiff Compression Labs, Incorporated alleged that defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 4,698,672 entitled "Coding System for Reducing Redundancy."
Google Inc. v. Skyline Software Systems Inc.November 18, 2004January 3, 2005
Plaintiff Google Inc. filed a declaratory judgment action against defendant Skyline Software Systems, Inc. regarding defendant's U.S. Patent No. 6,496,189 entitled "Remote landscape display and pilot training." Defendant had previously sued Keyhole, Inc., a company acquired by plaintiff, for patent infringement regarding the same patent.
Perfect 10 Inc v. Charlo Barbosa et alApril 13, 2004December 28, 2004
Perfect 10 Inc v. George Dranichak et alApril 13, 2004December 14, 2004
Kahle et al v. AshcroftMarch 22, 2004November 30, 2004
Plaintiffs sought declaratory judgment that the Berne Convention Implementation Act is unconstitutional under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment and that the BCIA and Copyright Term Extension Act together create an "effectively perpetual" term with respect to works first published after January 1, 1964 and before January 1, 1978, in violation of the Constitution's Progress Clause. Plaintiffs also sought preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against the criminal enforcement of § 2(b) of the No Electronic Theft Act of 1977.
Perfect 10 Inc v. Theodore M Hasse et alApril 13, 2004September 23, 2004
Perfect 10 Inc v. Bernard Rothschild et alApril 13, 2004August 25, 2004
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.April 23, 2002August 9, 2004
Plaintiff Overture Services Inc. alleged that defendant Google Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,269,361 entitled "System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine."
Marasciullo v. Cash Money Records et alOctober 30, 2009 
craigslist, Inc. v. Red Trumpet LLC et alOctober 5, 2009 
ONEOK, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.September 15, 2009 
Broadcast Music, Inc. et alAugust 25, 2009 
A.E. Bean Backus Gallery & Museum v. BoylesAugust 10, 2009 
Google Inc. v. John Beck Amazing Profits LLCJuly 28, 2009 
Steve Madden, Ltd. v. eBay, Inc.July 21, 2009 
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et alApril 6, 2009 
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. et alApril 3, 2009 
Gibson v. Cafepress.com, Inc.March 31, 2009 
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft CorporationMarch 20, 2009 
YIP (Winnie) v. HALLMARK GIFT LAND et alMarch 20, 2009 
Ezzo v. Google, Inc. et alMarch 17, 2009 
The Tobin Family Education and Health Foundation et al v Amazon.Com, Inc.March 17, 2009 
Media Queue, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et alMarch 10, 2009 
Elsevier B.V. et al v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et alMarch 9, 2009 
Good Sports Inc v. Cafepress.com Inc et alMarch 3, 2009 
Software Tree LLC v. Red Hat Inc. et alMarch 3, 2009 
Plaintiff Software Tree LLC alleged that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,163,776 entited "System and method for exchanging data and commands between an object oriented system and relational system."
Microsoft Corporation v. Griffin IT Media, Inc.February 27, 2009 
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation alleged that Defendant Griffin IT Media, Inc. infringed on Plaintiff's trade and service marks by registering Internet domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to Microsoft's trademarks and service marks, and by using those domain names in bad faith to profit from Microsoft's marks. Defendant's allegedly infringing domain names: hotmailprofile.com; teamhalo.com; x360live.com; xboxclan.com; xboxemulation.com; xboxheaven.com; xboxinsider.com; xboxmodding.com; xboxsale.com; xboxserver.com; sboxservice.com
Microsoft Corporation v. Instaclick, Inc. et alFebruary 27, 2009 
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation alleged that Defendants Instaclick, Inc. and Dan Traina infringed Microsoft's trade and service marks by registering Internet domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to Microsoft's trademarks and services marks, and by using those domain names in bad faith to profit from Microsoft's marks.
Microsoft Corporation v. TomTom NV et alFebruary 25, 2009 
Odom v. Microsoft CorporationFebruary 25, 2009 
PartsRiver, Inc. v. Shopzilla, Inc. et alFebruary 25, 2009 
Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation et alFebruary 24, 2009 
FREYBURGER LLC v. Microsoft CorporationFebruary 24, 2009 
Capitol Records, L.L.C. et al v. Seeqpod, Inc. et alFebruary 20, 2009 
Calabrese Stemer LLC et al v. Visa, Inc.February 19, 2009 
Shifferaw v. EMSON USA et alFebruary 19, 2009 
Wireless v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et alFebruary 13, 2009 
Psycho Monkey, LLC v. Zynga Game Network, Inc.February 10, 2009 
Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc.January 29, 2009 
Curators of the University of Missouri v. Suppes et alJanuary 26, 2009 
Global Innovation Technology Holdings, LLC et al v. Acer America Corp. et alJanuary 15, 2009 
Motorola Inc v. Research In Motion Limited et alJanuary 14, 2009 
IconFind v. Yahoo!January 13, 2009 
Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Intel Corporaton et alJanuary 12, 2009 
Information Protection and Authentication of Texas, LLC v. Symantec Corp. et alDecember 30, 2008 
MSTG, Inc. v. Research in Motion LimitedDecember 30, 2008 
Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et alDecember 29, 2008 
Quito Enterprises, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et alDecember 26, 2008 
Lavandeira v. Infuse, LLC et alDecember 23, 2008 
Gatehouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc. v. The New York Times Co.December 22, 2008 
Acer America Corp. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,December 17, 2008 
Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. v. Elizabeth Arden, et alDecember 17, 2008 
Stambler v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et alDecember 4, 2008 
Blackwell Publishing, Inc. et al v. Continuing Education Unlimited, Inc. et alNovember 26, 2008 
The Scranton Times, L.P. et al v. Wilkes-Barre Publishing CompanyNovember 24, 2008 
Newspaper Obituaries Aren't Hot News--Scranton Times v. Wilkes-Barre Publishing. By Eric Goldman. Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Desenberg v. Google, Inc.November 21, 2008 
Research In Motion Limited v. Eastman Kodak CompanyNovember 20, 2008 
LML Patent Corporation v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et alNovember 19, 2008 
Spansion LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et alNovember 17, 2008 
Plaintiff Spansion LLC alleged that Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,455,888 entitled "Memory Cell Structure for Elimination of Oxynitride (ONO) Etch Residue and Polysilicon Stringers," U.S. Patent No. 6,509,232 entitled "Formation of STI (Shallow Trench Isolation) Structures Within Core and Periphery Areas of Flash Memory Device," U.S. Patent No. 5,831,901 entitled "Method of Programming a Memory Cell to Contain Multiple Values," U.S. Patent No. 5,911,202 entitled "Method for Reducing Program Disturb During Self-Boosting in a NAND Flash Memory," U.S. Patent No. 6,433,383 entitled "Methods and Arrangements for Forming a Single Interpoly Dielectric Layer in a Semiconductor Device," and U.S. Patent No. 6,246,610 entitled "Symmetrical Program and Erase Scheme to Improve Erase Time Degradation in NAND Devices."
Barboza et al v. Fox-32 WFLD-TV et alNovember 14, 2008 
Alverson v. Microsoft Corporation et alNovember 13, 2008 
Global Law, LLP v. Google, Inc.November 12, 2008 
Motiva LLC v. Nintendo Co Ltd et alNovember 10, 2008 
Plaintiff Motiva LLC alleged that Defendants Nintendo Co. Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,292,151 entitled "Human Movement Measurement System."
craigslist, Inc. v. SzczodroskiNovember 5, 2008 
Balthaser Online, Inc. v. Network Solutions LLC et alNovember 4, 2008 
Plaintiff Balthaser Online Inc. alleged that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,000,180 entitled "Methods, Systems and Processes for the Design and Creation of Rich-Media Applications via the Internet."
Fidler et al v. Eberhart et alNovember 4, 2008 
Plaintiffs Jeffrey Fidler and James Fidler alleged that Defendants distributed DVDs that infringed on Plaintiffs' unpublished audiovisual works on bow hunting deers.
Hendricks v. Spangler et alOctober 29, 2008 
Plaintiff David S. Hendricks d/b/a Clipart deSIGN USA alleged that Defendants Dan Spangler and Cathy Davis willfully infringed Plaintiff's copyrights, by copying, displaying, selling, and distributing copies of Plaintiff's vector images through Defendants Yahoo! Inc. and eBay Inc.
ADC Technology Inc v. Microsoft Corporation et alOctober 27, 2008 
Hershey Company et al v. Art Van Furniture, IncOctober 21, 2008 
Plaintiffs The Hershey Company and Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corporation alleged that Defendant Art Van Furniture, Inc. utilitized the Hershey's trade dress to advertise, sell and distribute its products. Specifically, Defendant allegedly used an image of chocolate-colored sofa partially wrapped like a Hershey bar in its advertisements.
Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Avalanche CorporationOctober 20, 2008 
California Institute of Technology v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. et alOctober 15, 2008 
Plaintiff California Institute of Technology alleged that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,990,506 entitled "Active Pixel Sensors with Substantially Planarized Color Filtering Elements."
Habersham Plantation Corporation v. G&J Styles Inc et alOctober 15, 2008 
Plaintiff Habersham Plantation Corporation alleged that Defendants G & J Styles, Inc. and Halo Styles, LLC misappropriated Plaintiff's copyrighted furniture designs.
Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.October 13, 2008 
Dependable Staffing Services, L.L.C. v. Dependable Staffing Services, Inc. et alOctober 10, 2008 
Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Universal Studios Home Entertainment LLC et alOctober 10, 2008 
Steele v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. et alOctober 9, 2008 
Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. v. Opinion Corp. et alOctober 7, 2008 
Riley v. Dozier Internet Law, PCOctober 2, 2008 
Earthcomber, LLC v. Loopt, Inc., et al,October 1, 2008 
Saratoga Films Inc. v. Navarre Corp. et alOctober 1, 2008 
MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft CorporationSeptember 30, 2008 
Willis v. Electronic Arts, Inc. et alSeptember 29, 2008 
Plaintiff Gerald Willis alleged that Defendants Electronic Arts, Inc. and EA Sports used Plaintiff's composition "UNLV fight song: Win With the Rebels" in various sports games without permission, license or authority.
TRF Music Inc. v. Alan Ett Music Group, LLC. et alSeptember 26, 2008 
Procter & Gamble Company v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.September 23, 2008 
Plaintiff The Proctor & Gamble Company alleged that Defendant Kraft Foods Global, Inc. infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,169,418 and 7,169,419, both entitled "Packaging System to Provide Fresh Packed Coffee."
Sipco, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et alSeptember 19, 2008 
Plaintiff SIPCO, LLC alleged that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,891,838 entitled "System and Method for Monitoring and Controlling Residential Devices" and U.S. Patent No. 7,103,511 entitled "Wireless Communication Networks for Providing Remote Monitoring of Devices."
Man & Machine, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et alSeptember 18, 2008 
Plaintiff Man & Machine, Inc. alleged that Defendants Apple, Inc.'s use and proposed continued use of the trademark MIGHTY MOUSE violates Plaintiff's rights in its own MIGHTY MOUSE trademark. Plaintiff also alleged that any license to use the MIGHTY MOUSE trademark Apple purports to have received from Defendants CBS Corporation and CBS Operations, Inc. is invalid due to Plaintiff's preexisting, superior rights to use of the MIGHTY MOUSE trademark in connection with computer mouses.
Mazick v. Daughtry et alSeptember 17, 2008 
Stragent LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et alSeptember 9, 2008 
Motorola Inc v. Research In Motion Limited et alSeptember 3, 2008 
Ipex, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et alAugust 25, 2008 
Plaintiff Ipex, LLC alleged that Defendants Adobe Systems Incorporated, Xythos Software, Inc., Active Software, Inc., Open Text, Inc. Docscorp LLC and West Publishing Corporation infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,918,082 entitled "Electronic Document Proofing System."
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et alAugust 20, 2008 
Plaintiff Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. alleged that Defendant Nintendo Co. Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 7,139,983 entitled "Interactive Content Guide for Television Programming," and 7,158,118, 7,262,760 and 7,414,611 entitled "3D Pointing Devices with Orientation Compensation and Improved Usability."
OLA llc v. Builder Homesite Inc et alAugust 20, 2008 
Prive Las Vegas LLC et al v. PolitzAugust 20, 2008 
Odom v. Microsoft CorporationAugust 18, 2008 
Plaintiff Gary Odom alleged that Defendant Microsoft Corporation infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,363,592 entitled "Tool Group Manipulations."
Cellco Partnership et al v. Klausner Technologies, Inc.August 13, 2008 
Digital Security Systems Corporation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et alAugust 11, 2008 
Plaintiff Digital Security Systems Corporation, LLC alleged that Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,052,780 entitled "Computer System and Process for Accessing an Encrypted and Self-Decrypting Digital Information Product While Restricting Access to Decrypted Digital Information."
Microsoft Corporation v. Primax Electronics LTD.July 31, 2008 
Union Square Partnership, Inc. v. DurkeeJuly 30, 2008 
WIAV Solutions, L.L.C. v. Research In Motion, Ltd. et alJuly 30, 2008 
Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Fomdb.com et alJuly 28, 2008 
Plaintiffs Disney Enterprises, Inc. and Paramount Pictures Corporation alleged that Defendants FOMDB.com and Raymond Williams unlawfully distributed movies and other works in violation of Plaintiffs' copyrights.
SimpleAir Holdings, Inc. v. clearTXT, Inc. et alJuly 28, 2008 
Plaintiff SimpleAir Holdings, Inc. alleged that Defendants clearTXT, Inc., Mobile MEdia Technologies, LLC and Yahoo! Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,035,914 entitled "System and Method for Transmission of Data."
Universal City Studios Productions LLLP et al v. Movierumor.com et alJuly 28, 2008 
Plaintiff Universal City Studios Products LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and New Line Productions, Inc. alleged that Defendant Movierumor.com posted, organized, searched for, identified, collected and indexed links to infringing audiovisual works available on third-party websites.
Robert Morris College v. Robert Morris UniversityJuly 24, 2008 
Plaintiff Robert Morris College seeks a judgment that Plaintiff's use and adoption of the name Robert Morris University for its services do no infringe or violate any rights of Defendant Robert Morris University under the federal Lanham Act, or the laws of trademark and unfair competition under any other laws of the United States of any State in the United States. Defendant has obtained several federal service mark registrations incorporating the name Robert Morris University, including one for educational services in the nature of courses at the university level.
Jackson v. Taco Bell Corp.July 23, 2008 
NBC Universal, Inc. et al v. Redlasso, Inc.July 23, 2008 
Plaintiffs NBC Universal, Inc. Fox News Network, LLC and Fox Television Stations, Inc. alleged that Defendant Redlasso, Inc. copied Plaintiffs' programming and made it available on Defendant's website. Plaintiffs also alleged that Defendant permitted users to make clips of Plaintiff's programming for posting on third-party websites.
United States Olympic Committee, et al. v DoesJuly 22, 2008 
Plaintiff The United States Olympic Committee and the International Olympic Committee alleged that Defendants used Plaintiffs' intellectual property on seven websites to advertise the sale of tickets to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China. Plaintiffs further alleged that the tickets offered by Defendants do not exist, will not be delivered and cannot be used--in the case of Opening and Closing Ceremony tickets--even if they do exist and are delivered.
Pagemelding, Inc. v. Feeva Technology, Inc. et alJuly 21, 2008 
WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY et al v. J. DAVID SPURLOCK D/B/A VANGUARD PRODUCTIONS, INC.July 21, 2008 
Use of monster images on magazine covers in book are Fair Use. See http://ipspotlight.com/2009/08/07/reproductions-of-famous-monsters-art-work-ruled-fair-use-when-used-in-biography-of-artist/
Foster-Miller, Inc. et al v. Shotspotter, Inc.July 18, 2008 
Plaintiffs Foster-Miller, Inc., Planning Systems, Inc. and the Johns Hopkins University d/b/a the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory alleged that Defendant Shotspotter, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,965,541 entitled "Gun Shot Digital Imaging System."
Implicit Networks Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation et alJuly 15, 2008 
Plaintiff Implicit Networks Inc. alleged that Defendants International Business Machines Corporation, Oracle Corporation, SAP America Inc. and Adobe Systems Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,324,685 entitled "Applet Server that Provides Applets in Various Forms" and U.S. Patent No. 6,976,248 entitled "Application Server Facilitating with Client's Computer for Applets along with Various Formats".
Kabbalah Centre International, Inc. v. Osnat Youdkevitch et alJuly 14, 2008 
Tailgate Nation, Inc. et al v. Top Marketing USA et alJuly 11, 2008 
Konami Digital Entertainment Co, Ltd. et al v. Harmonix Music Systems, Inc. et alJuly 9, 2008 
Plaintiffs Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. and Konami Digital Entertainment, Inc. alleged that Defendants Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., MTV Networks, Co. and Viacom, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,390,923 entitled "Music Playing Game Apparatus, Performance Guiding Image Display Method, and Readable Storage Medium Storing Performance Guiding Image Forming Program," No. 6,425,822 entitled "Music Game with Selectable Controller Inputs" and No. 6,645,067 entitled "Music Staging Device Apparatus, Music Staging Game Method, and Readable Storage Medium."
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Allen Air Conditioning Co. et alJuly 3, 2008 
Plaintiffs, Pearson Education, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., seek to prevent the importation and resale of copies of their works that have been lawfully manufactured and purchased outside the United States.

Resources

Gotuit Media Corporation v. Microsoft CorporationJuly 2, 2008 
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et alJuly 1, 2008 
Saxon Innovations, LLC v. Apple, Inc. et alJune 26, 2008 
Verne Troyer v. TMZ, Productions Inc. et alJune 26, 2008 
Aloft Media LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et alJune 25, 2008 
Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC alleges that Defendants Yahoo!, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and AOL LLC infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,117,443 entitled "Network Browser Graphical User Interface for Managing Web Content," U.S. Patent No. 7,194,691 entitled "Network Browser Window with Adjacent Identifier Selector Interface for Storing Web Content." The allegedly infringing products include the AT&T Yahoo! Browser and the AOL Explorer Version 1.5.
Hearts on Fire Company, LLC v. Blue Nile, Inc.June 20, 2008 
Clear With Computers, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et alJune 18, 2008 
American Association for the Advancement of Science et al v. Periodicals Publicacoes Tecnicas et alJune 13, 2008 
Nintendo of America Inc v. Nyko Technologies IncJune 10, 2008 
YIP, et al V. BEARHANDS, LTD.June 10, 2008 
Benjey v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et alJune 3, 2008 
Plaintiff Thomas Ray Benjey sued Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and On-Demand Publishing, LLC d/b/a BookSurge for copyright infringement. Plaintiff alleges that Amazon fulfilled some of its online orders for Plaintiff's book -- "Keep A-goin: The Life of Lone Star Dietz" -- by obtaining copies of the advance reading copies from BookSurge, who knew they were not authorized to print final copies.
Loopt, Inc. v. Sponsorhouse, Inc.June 3, 2008 
Girafa.Com,Inc. v. Alexa Internet, Inc. et alJune 2, 2008 
Kuklachev et al v. Gelfman et alJune 2, 2008 
Elsevier, Inc. et al v. Sagar et alMay 29, 2008 
Man & Machine, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et alMay 20, 2008 
Elsevier, Inc. v. Does 1-10May 16, 2008 
Yahoo! Inc. v. XYZ Companies et alMay 16, 2008 
Plaintiff Yahoo! alleges that defendants disseminated mass electronic mail messages claiming that the recipient had won a lottery, prize or other award from Yahoo! Defendants then allegedly lured recipients into sending personal information to them, which was used to access bank accounts and credit cards, apply for credit cards or loans, and create fraudulent identification documents. Defendants also duped the recipients into sending them money for processing and mailing charges.
Clear With Computers, LLC v. Belkin International, Inc. et alMay 13, 2008 
Thomson Canada Limited et al v. Thomson-Reuters.ComMay 13, 2008 
Plaintiffs Thomson Canada Limited and Reuters Limited filed an in rem action against the Internet domain name thomson-reuters.com under the federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, federal trademark infringment law, federal anti-dilution law and federal unfair competition law.
DSW, Inc. et al v. Zappos.com, Inc. et alMay 12, 2008 
Monster Cable Products v. Monster Mini Golf, et al.May 12, 2008 
Prism Technologies v. PayPalApril 30, 2008 
Fullview, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationApril 29, 2008 
Plaintiff FullView, Inc. alleged that Defendant Microsoft Corporation infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,700,711 entitled "Panoramic Viewing System with a Composite Field of View."
Dupre et al v. Koewing et alApril 28, 2008 
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Stanford Rehab Medical GroupApril 23, 2008 
Plaintiff The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University alleged that Defendant Stanford Rehab Medical Group infringed on Plaintiff's federally registered trademarks and service marks
Datatern, Inc. v. Bank of America Corporation et alApril 21, 2008 
Plaintiff DataTern Inc. alleges that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,937,402 entitled "System for Enabling Access to a Relational Database from an Object Oriented Program."
Pitchware, Inc. v. Monster Worldwide, Inc. et alApril 7, 2008 
Plaintiff Pitchware, Inc. alleges that Defendants have infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,043,454 entitled "Method and Apparatus for a Cryptographically Assisted Commercial Network System Designed to Facilitate Idea Submission, Purchase and Licensing and Innovation Transfer."
Ultra Products, Inc. v. Antec, Inc. et alApril 4, 2008 
IHOP CORP. et al v. LANGLEYApril 3, 2008 
Phenomenon Licensing v. MySpace Inc.March 20, 2008 
Taylor v. Amazon.com, Inc. et alMarch 17, 2008 
Plaintiff Lou Maxell Taylor alleged that Defendants Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon Digital Services Inc. had offered for sale MP3 files of the Cheshire Tree Suite, a musical work authored and composed by the Plaintiff and marketed by QuiXote Music. Plaintiff asserted that he had never given permission to Defendants to sell MP3 files of the work, and that Defendants misattributed the copyright of the work to QuiXote instead of himself.
eBay Inc. v. Telebay LLCMarch 14, 2008 
Plaintiff eBay Inc. alleges that Defendant's Telebay Mark is highly similar to the registered eBay Marks in appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression.
Martin v. Nintendo of America Inc.March 7, 2008 
Aloft Media LLC v. Nokia Inc. et alMarch 6, 2008 
GraphOn Corporation v. Classified Ventures, LLC et alMarch 6, 2008 
Bissoon-Dath et al v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. et alFebruary 29, 2008 
United States Olympic Committee v. Olympic Supply, Inc., et alFebruary 25, 2008 
Figa v. Apple Inc.February 22, 2008 
Plaintiff Romek Figa d/b/a Abraham & Son alleged that Defendant Apple Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 4,924,496 entitled "Automatic Incoming Telephone Call Originating Number and Party Display System."
Refined Recommendation Corporation v. Netflix, Inc.February 22, 2008 
Plaintiff Refined Recommendation Corporation alleges that Defendant Netflix Inc. has infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,606,102 entitled "Optimizing Interest Potential."
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et alFebruary 19, 2008 
Driessen et al v. Starbucks et alFebruary 19, 2008 
Plaintiffs James L. and Marguerite A. Driessen alleged that Defendants Starbucks Corporation and Apple Computer, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,003,500 entitled "Retail Point of Sale (RPOS) Apparatus for Internet Merchandising."
Martin v. Apple Inc.February 15, 2008 
Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership et alFebruary 14, 2008 
EchoStar Satellite, L.L.C. v. Madden et alFebruary 14, 2008 
Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC. et al v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc. et alFebruary 14, 2008 
University of Tennessee v. Action Sports Media, Inc et alFebruary 12, 2008 
Plaintiff University of Tennessee sued Defendants Action Sports Media, Inc., Unified Armies of America, Inc., Gordon Whitener, Jerry Felix, and David Jamison, collectively d/b/a "Big Orange Army" for using the university's marks and the Big Orange Army marks in connection with the promotion of the University's athletic teams.
Sprinkles Cupcakes, Inc. v. Halpenny et alFebruary 8, 2008 
Plaintiff Sprinkles Cupcakes, Inc. alleged that Defendants Elizabeth Halpenny and Ali Loewenstein d/b/a SprinkleSprinkle infringed on Plaintiff's Sprinkles Marks.
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. et alFebruary 8, 2008 
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. Wireless Exclusive USA LLC et alFebruary 5, 2008 
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION v. Intel CorporationFebruary 5, 2008 
Plaintiff Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation alleges that Defendant Intel Corporation infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,781,752 entitled "Table Based Data Speculation Circuit for Parallel Processing Computer."
Implicit Networks Inc v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc et alFebruary 4, 2008 
Jenkins v. Motylzka et alJanuary 30, 2008 
Plaintiff John A. Jenkins d/b/a Jenkz Innovative Designs, LLC seeks an order that Defendants Gary Motylyka and eBay Inc. cease and desist from selling products protected by US Design Patent No. D548,660 S, entitled "Chrome Sleeve that Covers the Top and Sides of the Grille in Front of the Radiator of an Automobile."
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated et al v. New Dream Network, LLC et alJanuary 28, 2008 
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et alJanuary 22, 2008 
Plaintiff Minerva Industries, Inc. alleges that Apple, Inc. and AtlanticRT, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,321,783 entitled "Mobile Entertainment and Communication Device."
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Research In Motion Corporation et alJanuary 22, 2008 
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et alJanuary 22, 2008 
BlueAir Inc. v. Apple, Inc.January 18, 2008 
Plaintiff BlueAir Inc. seeks a declaratory judgment that its AIRPOD mark for desktop air purifiers does not infringe Apple's rights in its registered trademarks iPOD for portable personal music players.
TracFone Wireless Inc et al v. Shazia & Noushad Corporation et alJanuary 15, 2008 
National Numismatic Certification, LLC et al v. Ebay, Inc. et alJanuary 10, 2008 
Plaintiffs National Numismatic Certification, LLC, ASA Accugrade, Inc., PCI Coin Grading, inc., Sovereign Entities Grading Service, Inc., Treasure Gallery, Inc. and Centsles, Inc. alleges that Defendants eBay Inc., American Numismatic Association and Professional Numismatists Guild defamed them by developing a "certified" coins policy that only permits the listing of coins on eBay as certified if they were graded by approved grading services. Plaintiff alleges that this policy implies that coins graded by non-approved grading services are counterfeit.
1-800 Contacts v. Lensworld.comJanuary 8, 2008 
Global Patent Holdings, LLC v. Panthers BRHC LLCJanuary 8, 2008 
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et alDecember 28, 2007 
Plaintiff Parallel Networks, LLC alleges that Defendants infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,894,554 (System for Managing Dynamic Web Page Generation Requests by Intercepting Request At Web Server and Routing to Page Server Thereby Releasing Web Server to Process Other Requests) and 6,415,335 B1 (System and method for managing dynamic web page generation requests).
1-800 Contacts v. Premier Holdings et alDecember 6, 2007 
RealNetworks Inc v. QSA ToolWorks LLCDecember 6, 2007 
Plaintiff RealNetworks, Inc. seeks a declaratory judgment that Defendant QSA Toolworks, LLC has no rights to the TCM HELIX marks, that any rights QSA has in the HELIX marks are junior to RealNetworks' rights in the HELIX marks, QSA is bound by the terms of the Consent Agreement as an assign and/or successor of TCM, and there is no likelihood of confusion with respect to each parties' use of HELIX for their respective goods and services.
Girafa.com Inc. v. Amazon Web Services LLC et alDecember 5, 2007 
Plaintiff Girafa.com, Inc. alleges that Defendants Amazon Web Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Alexa Internet, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Snap Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Smartdevil Inc., Exalead, Inc. and Exalead S.A. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,864,904 entitled "Framework for Providing Visual Context to WWW Hyperlinks." The patent covers a method and system for displaying an image of a website when hovering over a hyperlink.
Global Patent Holdings, LLC v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et alDecember 5, 2007 
Klausner Technologies, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et alDecember 3, 2007 
Autobytel Inc v. Insweb Corporation et alNovember 30, 2007 
Plaintiff Autobytel Inc. alleges that Defendants Insweb Corporation, LeadPoint Inc., Internet Brands Inc. and Auto Internet Marketing Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 6,282,517 entitled "Real Time Communication of Purchase Requests."
Ron Goldman v. The Pirate Bay et alNovember 29, 2007 
Plaintiff Ron Goldman LLC sued Defendant The Pirate Bay for illegally distributing unauthorized electronic copies of O.J. Simpson's IF I DID IT manuscript.
z4 Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationNovember 29, 2007 
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et alNovember 27, 2007 
Chopra v. Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP et alNovember 21, 2007 
Barry Rosen v. eBay, Inc. et alNovember 16, 2007 
Cambridge Technology Development, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationNovember 16, 2007 
Digital Background Corporation v. Apple, Inc.November 14, 2007 
Capitol Records, Inc. et al v. MP3TUNES, LLC et alNovember 9, 2007 
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. Carter's Inc. et alNovember 9, 2007 
MARKET AMERICA, INC. v. OPTIHEALTH PRODUCTS, INC. et alNovember 8, 2007 
TimeBase Pty Ltd. v. Thomson Corporation, The et alNovember 7, 2007 
Plaintiff TimeBase Pty Ltd. alleged that Defendants The Thomson Corporation, West Publishing Corporation, and West Services, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 7,293,228 entitled "MALTweb Multi-Axis Viewing Interface and Higher Level Scoping."
O'Brien & Gere Limited v. Business Software AllianceNovember 5, 2007 
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. RDR Books et alOctober 31, 2007 
Copyright, trademark and other claims against publisher of Harry Potter Lexicon, an unauthorized compendium of Harry Potter facts, plots, etc.
The Kilimanjaro Corporation v. Scribd.com et alOctober 26, 2007 
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Stanford Hospital and Clinics et al v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, S.A.October 24, 2007 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated v. Leonard Fitness, Incorporated et alOctober 19, 2007 
Vallavista Corporation v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et alOctober 19, 2007 
Plaintiff Vallavista Corporation alleges that Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Target Corporation, eBags, INc. Emporium Leather Company, Inc., Royce Leather and Fashion Handbags, Inc. d/b/a Bo Bo Bags infringed on U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,008,495 for TAXI WALLET®.
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Fourth Quarter, Inc. et alOctober 12, 2007 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated et al v. BowlerOctober 12, 2007 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated et al v. Kotler et alOctober 12, 2007 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated et al v. Maryland Plastic Surgery Associates, LLC et alOctober 12, 2007 
Zomba Recording LLC v. Mario Aramando Lavandeira et alOctober 11, 2007 
The Associated Press v. Moreover Technologies, Inc. et alOctober 9, 2007 
Plaintiff The Associated Press alleged that Defendants Moreover Technologies, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. have reproduced AP's articles on Defendants' services without permission, altered or removed Plaintiff's copyright management information, promoted AP as a source for Defendant's services without authorization and trespassed on Plaintiff's chattels by using search robots or crawlers to retrieve information from AP's computer servers.
Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. Highway One Limited Partnership et alOctober 5, 2007 
The Cartoon Network, Inc. v. Adult Cartoon Network Inc.October 1, 2007 
Polaris Industries Inc. et al v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.September 19, 2007 
Shady Ladies, LLC v. GGW Marketing, LLC et alSeptember 18, 2007 
American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. Autoclear, LLC et alSeptember 13, 2007 
Reiber et al v. Western Digital Corp. et alSeptember 10, 2007 
GraphOn Corporation v. Juniper Networks, Inc.August 28, 2007 
Plaintiff GraphOn Corporation alleged that Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 5,826,014, 6,061,798, 7,028,336 entitled "Firewall System for Protecting Network Elements Connected to a Public Network."
Fremantlemedia North America, Inc. v. Goss et alAugust 24, 2007 
GraphOn Corporation v. AutoTrader.com, Inc.August 24, 2007 
Plaintiff GraphOn Corporation alleged that Defendant AutoTrader.com, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,324,538 and 6,850,940 entitled "Automated On-Line Information Service and Directory, Particularly for the World Wide Web."
Instabook Corporation v. Amazon.com et alAugust 24, 2007 
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Movie Clean LLCAugust 24, 2007 
Constellation IP, LLC v. Allstate Corporation et alAugust 23, 2007 
IN RE: DESLORATADINE PATENT LITIGATION - MDL1851August 17, 2007 
1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com Inc. et alAugust 13, 2007 
Plaintiff 1-800 Contacts, Inc. alleges that Defendant Lens.com, Inc. d/b/a Lens.com, JustLens.com and JustLenses.com had purchased sponsored advertisements from Google and other search engines for Plaintiff's marks.
Jackson v. Grupo Industrial Hotelero,S.A. et alAugust 9, 2007 
Global Patent Holdings, LLC v. CDW Corporation et alAugust 8, 2007 
Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. TenenbaumAugust 7, 2007 
Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. TenenbaumAugust 7, 2007 
Blackboard, Inc. v. iParadigms, LLCAugust 3, 2007 
NBC Universal, Inc. v. Guthy-Renker Corporation et alAugust 3, 2007 
Lenz v. Universal Music Group Inc. et alJuly 24, 2007 
Red Bull GMBH et al v. Axent CorporationJuly 24, 2007 
Plaintiffs Red Bull GmbH and Red Bull North America, Inc. alleged that Defendant Axent Corporation manufactured, advertised, promoted, marketed, distributed and sold a Unicorn Energy Drink featuring a trade dress confusingly similar to and dilutive of the Red Bull marks and trade dress. Plaintiff also alleged that Defendant's website, which promoted the Unicorn Energy Drink, closely mimics the content and style of the Red Bull website.
Red Bull North America, Inc. v. Dicey's 2nd Street,IncJuly 18, 2007 
Plaintiff Red Bull North America, Inc. and Red Bull GmbH LLC alleged that Defendants Dicey's 2nd Street, Inc. d/b/a Dicey Riley's, Michael Brennan and Aileen Comer passed off Red Fuel and Red Light as Red Bull.
Boston Duck Tours v. Super Duck Tours, LLCJuly 3, 2007 
In re: Rembrandt Technologies LP Patent LitigationJune 21, 2007 
Deborah Novak et al v. Warner Bros Pictures LLC et alJune 20, 2007 
Callaway Golf Company v. Acushnet CompanyJune 8, 2007 
GraphOn Corporation v. Juniper Networks, Inc.May 31, 2007 
Plaintiff GraphOn Corporation alleged that Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,826,014 and 6,061,798 entitled "Firewall System for Protecting Network Elements Connected to a Public Network," and 7,028,336 entitled "Firewall Providing Enhanced Network Security and User Transparency."
WizKids Inc v. Wizards of the Coast IncMay 25, 2007 
West v. Perry et alMay 21, 2007 
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Stillwater Restaurants, Inc. et alMay 8, 2007 
EXPLOROLOGIST LIMITED v. SAPIENTMay 7, 2007 
Plaintiff Explorologist Ltd. alleged that Defendant Brian Sapient a/k/a Brian J. Cutler d/b/a Rational Response Squad for infringing British copyright law. Defendant allegedly uploaded to YouTube a sequence of images entitled "James Randi exposes Uri Geller and Peter Popoff," which included portions of the film "Dr Hughes."
Electric Ladyland II, LLC v. Experience Hendrix, LLC et alApril 18, 2007 
Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC. et al v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc. et alMarch 30, 2007 
Plaintiff Gary Friedrich alleges that the Marvel companies and a group of major entertainment industry players have joined together to take the plaintiff's Johnny Blaze/Ghost Rider characters and origin story from him without authorization or compensation.
In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent LitigationMarch 30, 2007 
Sprinkles Cupcakes Inc v. Four Unlikely Friends LLCMarch 13, 2007 
i4i Limited Partnership v. Microsoft CorporationMarch 8, 2007 
Experience Hendrix LLC et al v. Electric Hendrix LLC et alMarch 6, 2007 
GovDeals, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TennesseeFebruary 9, 2007 
Red Bull North America, Inc. et al v. Orlando Nightclub Enterprises, Inc. et alFebruary 6, 2007 
1-800 Contacts Inc v. Manila Industries Inc et alJanuary 26, 2007 
Shloss v. JoyceJanuary 25, 2007 
copyright
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc v. Zazzle.ComDecember 14, 2006 
Lions Gate Entertainment Inc v. CafePress.com IncDecember 13, 2006 
Mophonics Inc v. Mantra Films IncJanuary 12, 2006 
iParadigms, LLC. v. McLean Committee for Student RightsDecember 6, 2006 
MCNEIL NUTRITIONALS, LLC v. HEARTLAND SWEETENERS LLC et alDecember 5, 2006 
GGW Marketing LLC v. Dolce and Gabbana USA IncDecember 1, 2006 
X17 Inc v. LavandeiraNovember 30, 2006 
DC Comics v. Fed Promotion CompanyNovember 22, 2006 
UMG Recordings Inc v. MySpace IncNovember 17, 2006 
Tokidoki LLC v. Forever 21 Retail IncNovember 16, 2006 
RMC Publications, Inc. v. CNET Networks, IncNovember 13, 2006 
NTP, Inc. v. Palm, Inc.November 6, 2006 
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.October 30, 2006 
Samsung America Inc v. Forever 21 Retail IncOctober 18, 2006 
Cavs USA Inc v. ACE Karaoke CorporationOctober 13, 2006 
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. et alOctober 11, 2006 
JTH Tax Inc. v. BonaventuraSeptember 29, 2006 
Chamberlain Group, Inc., The v. Skylink Group, The et alSeptember 25, 2006 
Akamai Technologies, Inc. et al v. Limelight Networks, Inc.September 5, 2006 
Tur v. YouTube IncJuly 14, 2006 
Tur v. YouTube SJ Motions Denied. Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Klausner Technologies, Inc. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et alJuly 11, 2006 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated et al v. Cozmedic Surgery Associates, L. L. C. et alJune 30, 2006 
Douglas v. Talk America IncJune 16, 2006 
WAKA LLC v. DCKICKBALL et alMay 30, 2006 
Hasbro, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, IncMay 26, 2006 
Plaintiff Hasbro, Inc. alleged that Defendant MGA Entertainment, Inc. engaged in trademark infringement and unfair competition by selling MEMORY MATCH-UP, a matching game similar to Plaintiff's own card matching game named MEMORY.
Jones Day v. Maverick LLCMay 11, 2006 
HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC vs. GOOGLE INC.April 12, 2006 
Winternals Software v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et alApril 11, 2006 
Lucky Break Wishbone Corporation v. Sears Roebuck and Co et alMarch 7, 2006 
Eight Mile Style, L. L. C. et al v. Phattones Media Productions, IncorporatedFebruary 24, 2006 
Plaintiff Eight Mile Style, LLC and Martin Affiliated, LLC alleged that defendant Phattones Media Productions, Inc. sold ring tones through their website www.phattone.com that exploited musical compositions by Eminem and D12 without their permission.
Waka, LLC v. DCKickball et alFebruary 15, 2006 
Muvico Theaters v. Business Software, et alJanuary 19, 2006 
Wizards of the Coast Inc v. Rutter et alJanuary 19, 2006 
Cover Design Inc v. Forever 21 IncJanuary 13, 2006 
Revah Holdings Inc v. Forever 21 IncJanuary 5, 2006 
Lucky Break Wishbone Corporation v. Hot Ideas International IncDecember 21, 2005 
Mediaport Entertainment v. Business Software AllianceDecember 5, 2005 
Graphon Corp v. Autotrader.com, LLC, et alNovember 22, 2005 
Plaintiff GraphOn Corp. alleged that Defendants AutoTrader.com, Inc. and AutoTrader.com, LLC infringed on U.S. Patent Nos. 6,324,538 and 6,850,940 entitled "Automated On-Line Information Service and Directory, Particularly for the World Wide Web."
Fehoko v. Electronic Arts, IncAugust 18, 2005 
Marvel Enterprises Inc et al v. Revolution Studios Development Company LLC et alJune 20, 2005 
Klausner Technologies, Inc. v. America Online, Inc. et alJune 15, 2005 
Lucasfilm Ltd v. Shepperton Design Studios Limited et alMay 6, 2005 
E S S Entertainment 2000 Inc v. Rock Star Videos Inc et alApril 22, 2005 
JTH Tax, Inc. v. Google, Inc., et alApril 4, 2005 
In re: ACACIA MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,March 17, 2005 
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. LindorFebruary 28, 2005 
In Re: Rivastigmine Patent LitigationFebruary 18, 2005 
Testmasters Trademark LitigationDecember 16, 2004 
BARTLETT v. GOOGLE, INC, et alDecember 7, 2004 
Joanne Siegel et al v. Time Warner Inc et alOctober 22, 2004 
Joanne Siegel et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et alOctober 8, 2004 
1800 Contacts v. Coastal ContactsMarch 18, 2004 
Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.February 24, 2004 
DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. v. 321 StudiosFebruary 13, 2004 
American Blind and Wallpaper Factory, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et alJanuary 27, 2004 
TIVO Inc v. Echostar Comm, et alJanuary 5, 2004 
NTP Inc. v. Research In MotionNovember 13, 2001 
Adidas America, Inc et al v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.November 8, 2001 
Re/Max International v. Google Inc., et alJuly 27, 2001 
Xtraplus Corporation v. Google, Inc.May 18, 2001 
Xtraplus Corporation v. Google IncMay 15, 2001 
Lifestyle Lift Holding, Incorporated v. Lift SiteDecember 19, 2007 
Overture Services v. Google IncApril 4, 2002 
Jennifer Lopez et al v. Silver Cross (UK) Ltd. et alFebruary 25, 2009 
Jamison Law Group LTD v. DisputeSuite.com LLC et alFebruary 17, 2009 
Hochstein et al v. Microsoft Corporation et alJanuary 23, 2008 
Plaintiff Peter A. Hochstein, Jeffrey Tenenbaum and Harold W. Milton, Jr. allege that Defendants Microsoft Corp. and Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. infringed on U.S. Patent No. 5,292,125 entitled "Apparatus and Method for Electronically Connecting Remotely Located Video Games."
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C.January 6, 2009