Cases 11 - 20 of 24
First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-28
as 1:2011cv02982
Plaintiff:
First Time Videos, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-28
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wimo Labs LLC v. Sebert
as 1:2011cv02978
Plaintiff:
Wimo Labs LLC
Defendant:
Kesha Sebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boy Racer, Inc. v. Does 1-22
as 1:2011cv02984
Plaintiff:
Boy Racer, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-22
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Brownmark Films, LLC v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01013
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Viacom International Inc, Comedy Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Brownmark Films, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CP Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-300
as 1:2010cv06255
Plaintiff:
CP Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-300, Doe 300 and Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Wisconsin Interscholastic, et al v. Gannett Company, Incorporated, et al
as 10-2627
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WISCONSIN INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN-HIFI, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
GANNETT COMPANY, INCORPORATED and WISCONSIN NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Firth et al v. Yahoo! Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Robert Firth, Fan Action Inc and Blue and Gold Com
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc, Yahoo! Inc, Tim Prister and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Barboza et al v. Fox-32 WFLD-TV et al
as 1:2008cv06411
Plaintiff:
Juan Louis Barboza and Virtual Reality Film
Defendant:
Fox-32 WFLD-TV, Fox Interactive Media, Business & Legal Affairs, News Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Habersham Plantation Corporation v. G&J Styles Inc et al
as 1:2008cv05892
Plaintiff:
Habersham Plantation Corporation
Defendant:
G&J Styles Inc and Halo Styles LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc.
as 1:2008cv04178
Plaintiff:
Limitnone LLC
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
