Cases 1 - 10 of 11
K-BEECH, INC. v. DOE
as 2:2011cv06425
Plaintiff:
K-BEECH, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-35
as 2:2011cv05172
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-35
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-21
as 2:2011cv05173
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-21
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HARRIS et al v. WINFREY et al
as 2:2010cv05655
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRIS and UNIQUE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Defendant:
OPRAH WINFREY and THE OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Scranton Times, L.P. et al v. Wilkes-Barre Publishing Company
as 3:2008cv02135
Defendant:
Wilkes-Barre Publishing Company
Plaintiff:
The Scranton Times, L.P. and The Times Partner, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MAULE v. COLBERT et al
as 2:2008cv03358
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
STEPHEN COLBERT, BUSBOY PRODUCTIONS, SPARTINA PRODUCTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benjey v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Benjey
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and On-Demand Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PARKER v. YAHOO!, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02757
Plaintiff:
GORDON ROY PARKER
Defendant:
YAHOO!, INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
EXPLOROLOGIST LIMITED v. SAPIENT
as 2:2007cv01848
Plaintiff:
EXPLOROLOGIST LIMITED and EXPLOROLOGIST LIMITED
Defendant:
BRIAN SAPIENT, BRIAN SAPIENT, BRIAN SAPIENT and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MCCLATCHEY v. ASSOCIATED PRESS
as 3:2005cv00145
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA M. MCCLATCHEY, VALENCIA M. MCCLATCHEY, VALENCIA M. MCCLATCHEY and others
Defendant:
ASSOCIATED PRESS, ASSOCIATED PRESS and ASSOCIATED PRESS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
