Cases 41 - 50 of 80
PARTS GEEK, LLC v. U.S. AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv05578
Plaintiff:
PARTS GEEK, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. AUTO PARTS NETWORK, INC. and GOOGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06283
Plaintiff:
Performance Pricing, Inc. and Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant:
Google Inc., Google Inc., Google Inc. and others
Movant:
Neal Cohen, Neal Cohen, Vista IP Law Group, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Type:
Other Statutes
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google, Inc.
as 2:2009mc01553
Plaintiff:
CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC and Howard Stern
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Movant:
Randy R. Lyons, Randy R. Lyons and Chase Thompson
Olabode v. Google Inc.,
as 3:2009cv03414
Plaintiff:
Bolaji Olabode and Bolaji Olabode
Defendant:
Google Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
as 3:2009mc80097
Plaintiff:
Intermec Technologies Corp.
Defendant:
Palm, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Google Inc. and Google Inc.
Search Warrant Google Gmail electronic mail account eriknownet@gmail.com
as 2:2009mc50275
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
TradeComet.Com LLC v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01400
Plaintiff:
TradeComet.Com LLC, TradeComet.Com LLC and TradeComet.Com LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al
as 1:2009mc00017
Plaintiff:
Google Inc., AOL LLC, Yahoo! Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
SRA LLC and Altitude Capital Partners LP
Defendant:
L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive LLC and Site Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
as 5:2009mc80004
Plaintiff:
Software Rights Archive, LLC
Defendant:
Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.