Cases 31 - 40 of 49
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Cellco Partnership
as 1:2009cv03057
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Mobility LLC
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Cellco Partnership, Cellco Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Franklin v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00704
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Franklin
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv20258
Plaintiff:
Onel Gonzalez and Ron J. Brayteson
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04451
Plaintiff:
Avi Koschitzki
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gillis v. Apple Computer Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01835
Plaintiff:
William J. Gillis, Jr.
Defendant:
Apple Computer Inc, AT&T Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sen v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03864
Plaintiff:
Jai Sen, Jai Sen, Jai Sen and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Walters v. Apple Computer Inc et al
as 4:2008cv02484
Plaintiff:
Aaron Walters, Aaron Walters, Aaron Walters and others
Defendant:
Apple Computer Inc and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jessica Alena Smith, Jessica Alena Smith, Jessica Alena Smith and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Apple, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Figa v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2008cv10304
Plaintiff:
Romek Figa, Romek Figa and Romek Figa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Minerva Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AtlanticRT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
