Cases 1 - 10 of 62
RICHES v. NERI et al
as 2:2008cv00251
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
EMILIANO NERI, PATRICE G. ADCROFT and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHES v. BAHREE et al
as 2:2008cv00252
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
MEGHA BAHREE, ZACK O'MALLEY GREENBURG and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHES v. EBELING et al
as 2:2008cv00249
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
ASHLEA EBELING, SEAN P. HEGARTY and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHES v. BIRINYI et al
as 2:2008cv00250
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
LASZLO BIRINYI, LISA W. HESS and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riches v. Marsalis
as 1:2007cv02317
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Marsalis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riches v. Nacchio et al
as 1:2007cv02321
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Joseph P Nacchio and Jamie Olis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riches v. McBride
as 1:2007cv02319
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Justin McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riches v. The World Money Show
as 1:2007cv02315
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The World Money Show
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riches v. Berg et al
as 1:2007cv02320
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Nicholas Berg and Termini Brothers Bakery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riches v. DeJesse
as 1:2007cv02312
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Mario DeJesse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
