Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Fulton v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
Edward L Fulton
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stebbins v. Microsoft Inc
as 2:2011cv01362
Plaintiff:
David Stebbins
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Microsoft Corporation v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , Barnesandnoble.Com LLC , Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. and others
Counter_claimant:
Barnesandnoble.Com LLC and Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc
as 2:2011cv00134
Defendant:
TIVO Inc.
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc
as 2:2010cv01577
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Motorola Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Microsoft Corporation v. Lam et al
as 2:2009cv00815
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Eric Lam, Melanie Suen, Gordon Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Microsoft Corporation v. Mai et al
as 2:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Binh Eric Mai, Jane Doe Mai, Cuong Huy Mai and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Microsoft Corporation v. TomTom NV et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
TomTom NV and TomTom Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADC Technology Inc v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01579
Plaintiff:
ADC Technology Inc and ADC Technology Inc
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc, Sony Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Microsoft Corporation v. DHL Express (USA) Inc
as 2:2008cv01495
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
