The Trump administration has sued all 15 federal judges in Maryland over a court order that temporarily blocks the immediate deportation of immigrants seeking judicial review, arguing it infringes on executive authority. Read More.
Featured Stories
The federal appellate court ruled that the law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court. Read More.
Social media platform X filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, on June 17th, alleging that New York's "Stop Hiding Hate" Act violates the platform's free speech rights. Read More.
Recently Featured Dockets
Bodett et al v. G6 Hospitality LLC et al (filed 6/9/25)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Other Legal News
Trump Administration Will Try to Deport Abrego Garcia Before His Trial, Justice Dept. Says
The New York Times, July 7, 2025
The plan directly contradicted the White House, which last month described as “fake news” reports of plans to re-deport Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia.
New Document Undermines Trump Administration’s Claims About Deported Venezuelans
The New York Times, July 7, 2025
The document from El Salvador seems to undermine a position that lawyers for the Justice Department and top Trump officials have taken time and again in front of a judge in Washington.
Supreme Court Insists on Reams of Paper for Case Briefs in Digital Age
The New York Times, July 7, 2025
The court’s rules require many litigants to submit 40 copies of their briefs, resulting in millions of pages printed each term. Critics call the process outdated and wasteful.
Supreme Court agrees to hear cases on transgender athletes
SCOTUSblog, July 3, 2025
Just over two weeks after the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban on the use of puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors, the justices agreed to take up another…
Notes on the Opinions in Trump v. CASA, Inc.
Justia's Verdict, July 3, 2025
Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center professor Rodger Citron discusses the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., in which the Court limited federal district courts’ authority to issue universal injunctions that block enforcement of executive orders nationwide. Professor Citron describes the various opinions written by the justices and argues that the Court’s formalist approach, which restricts courts’ ability to check illegal executive actions while creating a two-track system where only active litigants receive constitutional protections, represents a dangerous refusal to consider the real-world consequences during a period of unprecedented assertions of executive power.
Summer Order Lists
Supreme Court of the United States, June 30, 2025
