Seen as the toughest bathroom ban in the country, the Idaho law applies to both public buildings and private businesses while imposing significant time behind bars for violations. Read More.
Featured Stories
Tyra Banks filed a defamation lawsuit against Netflix in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, on Saturday, June 13, 2026, alleging that the "Reality Check: Inside America's Next Top Model" documentary constructed a false narrative from hours of interview footage. Read More.
This case marked the first time that a defendant sentenced to death successfully used a groundbreaking 2020 anti-discrimination law to erase their sentence. Read More.
Addressing a Corrupt Pardon System
The New York Times, June 28, 2026
Readers respond to “There’s Actually Something We Can Do About Trump’s Pardons,” an Opinion guest essay by Tim Wu. Also: A loophole that harms our oceans.
How the Supreme Court Removed Key Protections for Immigrants
The New York Times, June 27, 2026
Our Supreme Court reporter Ann E. Marimow describes how a 6-3 majority of the justices removed protections for immigrants and asylum seekers amid the Trump administration’s crackdown.
Court rules for Roundup maker in dispute over cancer warnings on pesticide labels
SCOTUSblog, June 25, 2026
The Supreme Court Gives the Spending Clause a Haircut
Justia's Verdict, June 24, 2026
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf examines the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling in Landor v. Louisiana, which held that individual prison officials cannot be sued for damages under RLUIPA even after knowingly violating a Rastafarian prisoner’s religious freedom rights. Professor Dorf argues the majority opinion is constitutionally flawed and urges future litigants to plead the Commerce Clause as an independent basis for RLUIPA and similar Spending Clause statutes.
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor Bar Memorial
Supreme Court of the United States, February 19, 2026
A 1987 Proposal Could Help Hold ICE to Account for Constitutional Violations
The New York Times, February 2, 2026
A proposal in a 1987 law review article could address a gap that makes it all but impossible to sue federal officials for violating the Constitution.