The ruling clashes with an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision in a parallel case, potentially teeing up a First Amendment battle before the U.S. Supreme Court. Read More.
Featured Stories
Candidates sitting for the February 2025 California bar examination secured a settlement for $1.35 milllion from the software company that administered the test. Read More.
A bill considered by the Seattle City Council would expand existing protections against sexual orientation discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and public accommodations. Read More.
Recently Featured Dockets
Other Legal News
The Supreme Court’s New Term, and a Race for Nuclear Power on the Moon
The New York Times, October 5, 2026
Plus, why school music classes are under threat.
Supreme Court’s Climate Ruling Could Affect Many Kinds of Lawsuits
The New York Times, October 5, 2026
Briefs filed in the case asked the justices to consider what their decision could mean for issues as varied as gun violence and defamation.
Supreme Court to hear argument on Trump administration’s deportation of immigrants to third-party countries
SCOTUSblog, September 29, 2026
Important Takeaways From the Missouri Districting Debacle and the Supreme Court’s Reaction to It
Justia's Verdict, September 28, 2026
UC Davis Law professor Vikram David Amar discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s third rejection of Republican officials’ attempts to use Missouri’s 2025 redistricting map (HB1) for the 2026 congressional election, situating the ruling within the broader national redistricting conflict and analyzing what it reveals about the Court’s emergency docket practices. Professor Amar argues that the decision undercuts claims that the Court’s shadow docket favors Trump, demonstrates the Court’s insistence that lower federal courts respect its prior rulings and state supreme court authority under Rooker-Feldman and Moore v. Harper, and shows the Justices applying the Purcell doctrine while placing blame for the electoral confusion squarely on Missouri’s Republican Secretary of State rather than on the state courts.
Summer Order Lists
Supreme Court of the United States, July 1, 2026
A 1987 Proposal Could Help Hold ICE to Account for Constitutional Violations
The New York Times, February 2, 2026
A proposal in a 1987 law review article could address a gap that makes it all but impossible to sue federal officials for violating the Constitution.
