The U.S. Justice Department has sued California, alleging that the state's egg production laws unconstitutionally drive up national egg prices by imposing regulations that exceed federal standards. Read More.
Featured Stories
The Trump administration has sued all 15 federal judges in Maryland over a court order that temporarily blocks the immediate deportation of immigrants seeking judicial review, arguing it infringes on executive authority. Read More.
The federal appellate court ruled that the law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court. Read More.
Bodett et al v. G6 Hospitality LLC et al (filed 6/9/25)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Trump, Epstein and a Stinging SCOTUS Dissent
The New York Times, July 19, 2025
“The Opinions” round table discusses Trump and MAGA’s very bad week.
The ‘Little Epstein Theory’ vs. ‘Big Epstein Theory’
The New York Times, July 19, 2025
“The Opinions” round table discusses Trump and MAGA’s very bad week.
Where does Trump’s birthright citizenship order currently stand?
SCOTUSblog, July 18, 2025
Three weeks after the Supreme Court ruled to limit the use of nationwide, or universal, injunctions in a case stemming from President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, a…
Two Recent Developments Highlight Ways to Work Around the Supreme Court’s CASA Ruling
Justia's Verdict, July 16, 2025
UC Davis Law professor Vikram David Amar comments on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Trump v. CASA, Inc., in which the Court restricted the use of “universal injunctions” by federal district courts, which have been used to prevent enforcement of allegedly unconstitutional laws against all people rather than just the specific plaintiffs in a case. Professor Amar argues that initial reactions characterizing this as a major threat to civil rights were overstated, because courts retain alternative tools like class action certification and traditional injunctive relief that can still provide broad protection when necessary to fully protect plaintiffs.
Supreme Court Insists on Reams of Paper for Case Briefs in Digital Age
The New York Times, July 7, 2025
The court’s rules require many litigants to submit 40 copies of their briefs, resulting in millions of pages printed each term. Critics call the process outdated and wasteful.
Summer Order Lists
Supreme Court of the United States, June 30, 2025