The proposed law would criminalize the use or possession of cell phones by Vermont residents who are under 21. Read More.
Recently Featured Dockets
The Geo Group, Inc. v. Newsom et al (filed 12/30/19)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al (filed 12/30/19)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Western States Trucking Association v. Xavier Becerra, et al (filed 12/19/19)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
American Society of Journalists and Authors, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra (filed 12/17/19)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Nunes v. Cable News Network, Inc. (filed 12/3/19)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
USD 267 Renwick v. JUUL Labs, Inc. (filed 11/20/19)
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
Boston Executive Search Associates, Inc. v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP (filed 11/19/19)
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Other Legal News
Supreme Court to Consider Limits on Contraception Coverage
The New York Times, January 17, 2020
The justices will weigh Trump administration regulations allowing employers to refuse to provide access to birth control on religious or moral grounds.
Supreme Court to Hear Timely Case on Electoral College Voters
The New York Times, January 17, 2020
A handful of rogue electoral votes, if allowed, could tip the next presidential election.
Now available on Oyez: This week’s oral argument audio aligned with the transcripts
SCOTUSblog, January 17, 2020
Oyez has posted the aligned audio and transcripts from this week’s oral arguments at the Supreme Court. The court heard argument this week in: Lucky Brand Dungarees v. Marcel Fashion Group Thole v. U.S. Bank Kelly v. United States Romag Fasteners v. Fossil Babb v. Wilkie The post Now available on Oyez: This week’s oral argument audio aligned with the transcripts appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
In McGahn Case, an Epic Constitutional Showdown
The New York Times, January 13, 2020
The Supreme Court has never definitively resolved whether Congress can sue the president.
Is John Roberts a Closeted Never-Trumper? Reading Between the Lines of the Chief Justice’s Year-End Report
Justia's Verdict, January 8, 2020
Cornell law professor Michael C. Dorf offers one interpretation of Chief Justice John Roberts’s annual year-end report on the federal judiciary—that the Chief Justice intends to serve as a modest counterbalance to President Trump. Dorf supports his interpretation with text and context of the year-end report but offers his cautious praise to the Chief Justice with a few important caveats as well.
Press Release Regarding Justice Ginsburg
Supreme Court of the United States, November 23, 2019
