The Justices rejected a request to block parental consent and age verification requirements at this stage of an ongoing First Amendment challenge.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2025, lawyers representing immigrants' rights groups, U.S. citizens, and undocumented immigrants filed amicus briefs in opposition to the Trump administration's request to override a U.S. District Court's temporary restraining order related to immigration stops in Los Angeles and central California.
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals' Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended a 90-day suspension for two law firm founders who created and offered employment agreements with clauses that restricted lawyers' ability to practice after leaving the firm.
If it stands, the nine-figure award could influence how auto manufacturers integrate self-driving technology. They may be held liable even when drivers act recklessly.
The United States Department of Justice submitted court filings on Tuesday, July 29, 2025, explaining its reasoning as to why it requested courts unseal grand jury transcripts for sex offenders Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Uber has filed a federal RICO lawsuit against several personal injury attorneys and medical providers, alleging they conspired to create fraudulent insurance claims by directing clients to unnecessary medical treatments and submitting artificially inflated bills.
The Fourth Circuit rejected arguments by a drug manufacturer that a federal law preempts the state abortion ban as applied to medication abortions.
The U.S. Justice Department has sued California, alleging that the state's egg production laws unconstitutionally drive up national egg prices by imposing regulations that exceed federal standards.
The Trump administration has sued all 15 federal judges in Maryland over a court order that temporarily blocks the immediate deportation of immigrants seeking judicial review, arguing it infringes on executive authority.
The federal appellate court ruled that the law violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court.